Community > Posts By > solidform

 
no photo
Sun 04/06/08 01:50 AM
mile

no photo
Sun 04/06/08 12:23 AM
mice

no photo
Sun 04/06/08 12:11 AM
nice

no photo
Sat 04/05/08 11:56 PM
live

no photo
Sat 04/05/08 11:40 PM
hive

no photo
Mon 03/31/08 02:28 PM
Aerosmith Seasons of Wither

been trying to learn this one start to end..
;-}

no photo
Tue 05/29/07 12:04 AM
bump this up!!!! really?? no Ladies in Oregon?? no Portland??
hmmmm

no photo
Sun 05/27/07 08:50 PM
Very good question....

no photo
Sun 05/27/07 08:23 PM
it caught my attention.

no photo
Sun 05/27/07 08:23 PM
it caught my attention.

no photo
Sun 05/27/07 07:54 PM
Just curious???

by Lee Rogers

Global Research, May 21, 2007
roguegovernment


The Bush administration has released a directive called the National
Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive. The directive
released on May 9th, 2007 has gone almost unnoticed by the mainstream
and alternative media. This is understandable considering the huge Ron
Paul and immigration news but this story is equally as huge. In this
directive, Bush declares that in the event of a “Catastrophic
Emergency”, the President will be entrusted with leading the activities
to ensure constitutional government. The language in this directive
would in effect make the President a dictator in the case of such an
emergency.

The directive defines a “Catastrophic Emergency” as the following.

"Catastrophic Emergency" means any incident, regardless of location,
that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or
disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure,
environment, economy, or government functions;

So what does this mean? This is entirely subjective and doesn’t provide
any real concrete definition of what such an emergency would entail.
Assuming that it means a disaster on the scale of the 9/11 attacks or
Katrina, there is no question that the United States at some point in
time will experience an emergency on par with either of those events.
When one of those events takes place, the President will be a dictator
in charge of ensuring a working constitutional government.

The language written in the directive is disturbing because it doesn’t
say that the President will work with the other branches of government
equally to ensure a constitutional government is protected. It says
clearly that there will be a cooperative effort among the three branches
that will be coordinated by the President. If the President is
coordinating these efforts it effectively puts him in charge of every
branch. The language in the directive is entirely Orwellian in nature
making it seem that it is a cooperative effort between all three
branches but than it says that the President is in charge of the
cooperative effort.

The directive defines Enduring Constitutional Government as the
following.

"Enduring Constitutional Government," or "ECG," means a cooperative
effort among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the
Federal Government, coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity
with respect to the legislative and judicial branches and with proper
respect for the constitutional separation of powers among the branches,
to preserve the constitutional framework under which the Nation is
governed and the capability of all three branches of government to
execute constitutional responsibilities and provide for orderly
succession, appropriate transition of leadership, and interoperability
and support of the National Essential Functions during a catastrophic
emergency;

Further on in the document it states the following.

The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for
ensuring constitutional government.

This directive on its face is unconstitutional because each branch of
government the executive, legislative and judicial are supposed to be
equal in power. By putting the President in charge of coordinating such
an effort to ensure constitutional government over all three branches is
effectively making the President a dictator allowing him to tell all
branches of government what to do.

Even worse is the fact that the directive states that the Secretary of
Homeland Security will serve as the lead for coordinating overall
continuity operations. We already know that the Homeland Security
department is not really working to secure the homeland. Instead the
Homeland Security department is really working to enslave the homeland
just like the Home Office over in the United Kingdom has made that
country an Orwellian hell of closed-circuit TV spy cameras. If such an
emergency is declared, we can only guess what sort of surprises the
Homeland Enslavement department will have for us.

The directive itself recognizes that each branch is already responsible
for directing their own continuity of government procedures. If that’s
the case than why does the President need to coordinate these procedures
for all of the branches? This is nothing more than a power grab that
centralizes power and will make the President a dictator in the case of
a so called “Catastrophic Emergency”.

It is insane that this directive claims that its purpose is to define
procedures to protect a working constitutional government when the very
language in the document destroys what a working constitutional
government is supposed to be. A working constitutional government
contains a separation of powers between three equally powerful branches
and this directive states that the executive branch has the power to
coordinate the activities of the other branches. This directive is a
clear violation of constitutional separation of powers and there should
be angry protests from our legislators about this anti-American garbage
that came from the President.

Global Research Articles by Lee Rogers

no photo
Sat 05/26/07 10:34 PM
I am 46 ,,,I am young at heart and yet I feel connected to the ages of
the world in all it's history and changes. I never lie about my age
unless I am joking around in the salon and that is ussually stating that
I am 75 or 87,,,just to play.
;-}

no photo
Thu 05/24/07 11:22 PM
not so many here really,,,but I will look again. I only had it in the
Philipines.
;-}

no photo
Thu 05/24/07 11:02 PM
? Desert ? oh come now, desert is always a nice sweet surprise
Purplecat!!
;-}

no photo
Thu 05/24/07 11:01 PM
oh dear! of course he has!! he's eaten Balut!
;-}

no photo
Thu 05/24/07 10:59 PM
only in Pasay City,,I dont see it here locally
;-}

no photo
Thu 05/24/07 10:48 PM
OMG!
lol
you know then!! Pasay City late night Balut!!
;-}

no photo
Thu 05/24/07 10:46 PM
yeah!! me too !!! real hungry all of a sudden!!!
;-}

no photo
Thu 05/24/07 10:40 PM
LOL !!!!!!!!!! ok,,,,sounds good to me!!!!
I do it all the time!!! mmmmm mmmmm
;-}

no photo
Thu 05/24/07 10:35 PM
LOL,,,delivery or????
;-}