Also note that though photos may be similar, even 'identical' the username are all unique.
Whenever you come across a culprit with your personal photograph please report it as said a above.

With all due respect. I hope that you aren't part of the crowd who expect to be told what you 'must do.
How nice is it to make one's decision after a personal analysis of what's presented.

Majority support does not indicate the best, what's true nor wholesome.

The world of politics is a good example of that the majority nor popular are not usually the ones who make the best decisions..

It's not a question of endorsing. Personal experience, research into both Spanish and English bibles have brought me to the conclusion which Bible Version should be relied upon and avoid the 'doctered ones.

I first realized this 'versions war when I read the Bible in Spanish and saw a phrase 'hijo de los dioses' (Daniel- when the 3 youngmen were thrown into the furnace-comment about the resemblance of the fourth one)
That phrase means: son of the gods.
In English, in the KJV it says ' Son of God!

These phrases insinuate different thoughts.
1. About the Divinity of the fourth. Is he son or Son? Is he of the gods or of God?
2. That the king did not know of the God which these youngmen and Daniel served. When, they have testified of Him to the king before, including he had been the beneficiary of His wonders!
And also, the following verse shows that the king knew of the One and Only True God by his own declarations.

There's another part that cites the 'prophetS Isaiah' but the reference exist in the prophet Micah and not Isaiah!

In others, like most Spanish bibles, they present that 'to be angry' is a sin!
But in KJV it says ' be angry but sin not'!

No big deal say many. But Jesus was angry once. Did He sin? For if He did, we could just forget about the bible,God and the whole topic. Or is it an ' error ' to prove that Jesus isn't whom he said He is? And also, to make God a liar about His only Begotten Son who came from Him.
Doctrinal point. Can a sinner be a savior?

I hope you see the point.

I have been taught professionally to 'leave no stones unturned'.

Jesus admonished us to *search* the Scripture, to *compare* passages.
Only by doing that many mistakes 'embedded in some bibles would be revealed.

Some bibles eliminate the part about bowing down and worshiping of idols from the decalogue. They divide another commandment into two so that it might be read as still 10 commandments!

CLEVER! SUBTLE! DECEPTIVE! Right?

That's exactly how the enemy is!

I like that about the Non Inspired Version!
There's this New World Translation.
It won't be long for the Authorized New World Order Bible or Version!

But I'll stick with King Jesus Version - KJV!

Elsewhere there's a comment about worshiping the KJV!
I guess he rightly meant worshipping the God and Saviour presented in KJV Bible.

Note: This ludicrous work of 'art' is not only happening in English translations of the Bible but also the Spanish!

The most authenticated Spanish Bible was prohibited to be publish by the then king of Spain!
As a matter of fact the principal translater never even lived to his work printed!

So King James of England allowed and the king of Spain prohibited a work that is parallel!

Wow! How wonderful the mystery of God works.
God works in a very marvelous way which proves that it is not a work of man but of the Devine Author.

The works of men are the patches via different texts from Vatican and other 'new' discovered or 'upgraded texts!

The Bible is not like software that needs to be upgraded or patched.

The Bible comes with all features enabled, it's for all hardware, humanity and is the universal OS for all hearts throughout all ages!

Strange as it may sound, the Bible came with a warning/prophecy of the attempted mutulation of itself by others in the last book towards the end!

I like that about the Non Inspired Version!
There's this New World Translation.
It won't be long for the Authorized New World Order Bible or Version!

But I'll stick with King Jesus Version - KJV!

Elsewhere there's a comment about worshiping the KJV!
I guess he rightly meant worshipping the God and Saviour presented in KJV Bible.

Note: This ludicrous work of 'art' is not only happening in English translations of the Bible but also the Spanish!

The most authenticated Spanish Bible was prohibited to be publish by the then king of Spain!
As a matter of fact the principal translater never even lived to his work printed!

So King James of Enland allowed and the king of Spain prohibited a work that is para

I can't see why we are aiding the Adversary in his conquest to isolate us more and more of the One and Only Wise God.
It is so strange that among the over 200 languages spoken and written that we are able to communicate among ourselves and these languages are not so much a barrier.
Many scientific discoveries, inventions were made in German, French, Italian, English, to cite examples, and it they have disseminated the world regardless of national languages.
And they are all understood.

To insinuate that no English Bible can be deem reliable or faithful translation from the original is absurd!
Should we all learn Greek, Hebrew, etc to verify the authenticity of the English Bible?
There's no 1:1 translation, transliteration, interpretation and even reproduction.
That's why original must be unique!

However, there was an era that to possess the written Bible or parts of it, regardless of language, was deemed illegal by the powers that were, secular and church!
'Authorized' version is simply the work that was authorized by that secular power.
It had nothing to do with its content. Bibles in general still offends those in power and authority.
Rome, as once the only universal kingdom, has made that clear.

Read about Gen. Berthier Bonaparte(¿) and the hostage of pope Pius. Investigate the reasons behind those events and the agreement made.

Also, investigate the confusion that existed in those councils in, before and after the year AD321.

I see 'modern English bibles that in one verse say "gods" and in the following, "God" with reference to the same being by the same speaker!
I see bibles with verses quoting another book.verse with incorrect references!

These bibles are lying or embedding with 'errors with the aim to confuse and to eradicate confidence in the Bible.
That is, among all the translations, transliterations and commentaries, to present the Bible as a work of confusion, subjective, inaccurate, lies ir half-truths!
It does not take a scholor nor does it depends on language of translation, to see this!
One says my Bible says this, other my Bible says that, or our Bible does not put it like this or that.

With so many 'my Bible due to the commerce of translating printing bibles, due to religious dogmas by altering texts to be inline with preconceived beliefs

I am a male. I have fantasies of being with lesbians.

My question is for you ladies that at some point have had a lesbian relationship.
How does it feel? You may be as graphic as words will let you.

Thanks for your reply in the forum or directly to my inbox.

Lol

I don't even know what is really meant by lol!
Ask her question. Reply, lol!
Make a statement. Response, lol.
A complement. Thanks lol!
Say something that upsets her. LOL!

Lol or laugh out loud is no more lol!

I totally agree that scenario and its explanation of online conversations.

Honestly, to me it's not subject to age, gender, or online familiarity.

If there's a personal person to person relationship the online jokes, sarcasms, etc. has some [better]context.
And even then, it is not a guarantee!

I guess all this has to do with the complexity of communication(expressions).

Facial gestures can express multiples of ideas. Without getting to literature, poetry or prose, a text message must be taken literally else we will never know what is meant.

Example: I can create this gesture where you see me looking angry while forcing not to smile. That will evoke a smile or laughter in another and eventually in me.
Now how do I convey that in text message despite of the growing number of icons. (and if it were not their textual description I would not know what 80% of them are trying to represent).

Hi. Just to let you know that I'm a man who can give all the pleasure that you can get from any chic PLUS MORE.
It will be mutual the fantasies, the pleasures, the passion and the simplicity.

'Success' in any relationship is NOT gender- specific. That, is woman-2-woman and woman-2-man each and all have the same problems.

Well, that is if the goal is the same - to be together, to make out together, romance.

But I doubt a w-2-w can give romance, a family.
No woman can another woman MORE than me. Sorry, but I'm not being arrogant nor macho! I know of a secret!

In both relationship types, one has and is always dominant.

What happens 'power struggle may alter the sexual peace.

With some women wishing not be 'dominated by a male, but INSTEAD, seek to 'dominate a woman.

While, some other women PREFERRING to be 'dominated by another woman than by a man.

To me this 'dominance or power struggle is extra-sexual but at times negatively impacts the sexual.

Sexuality is mutual, I give, you give, with the quest of trying to out-give each other. Each time a little bit more.