Topic: Clinton in jail for stabbing Obama!
no photo
Tue 02/26/08 11:55 PM
Edited by leahmarie on Wed 02/27/08 12:04 AM
Gottcha! laugh Actually, it is

Clintonite Stabs Obama Supporter

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0225081ortiz1.html

Clintonite Stabs Obama Supporter
Cops: Man assaulted brother-in-law during political argument
FEBRUARY 25--Meet Jose Antonio Ortiz. The Pennsylvania man allegedly stabbed his brother-in-law in the stomach after the pair quarreled about their respective support of Democratic presidential candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. According to cops, Ortiz, 28, stabbed Sean Shurelds last Thursday night in the kitchen of an Upper Providence Township home. According to a criminal complaint, a copy of which you'll find here, the 41-year-old Shurelds, an Obama supporter, told Ortiz that the Illinois senator was "trashing" Clinton (apparently in regard to recent primary and caucus results). Ortiz, a Clinton supporter, replied that "Obama was not a realist." While not exactly fighting words, the verbal political tiff led to some mutual choking and punching. And, allegedly, a stabbing in the abdomen. Ortiz, pictured in the mug shot below, was charged with a felony aggravated assault count and two misdemeanors and jailed in lieu of $20,000 bail. Shurelds was flown to Hahnemann University Hospital, where he was admitted in critical condition.


Here are my thoughts on the above copy/pasted post. So a Clinton and an Obama supporter got violent with each other (while debating which of the two candidates would end the war if there’s any irony in the world). As you can see from the mug shot, the Obama supporter had apparently worked over the Clinton supporter pretty good before the Clinton supporter shived him.

Regardless of who won the fight though, the great thing about this primary is that thanks to its intensity, the two factions are pulling out all of the dirty tricks they normally use against Republicans and using them on each other.

I’ve pointed out Democrat dirty tricks and what-not over the years, but since Democrats always had been using them against Republicans, the usual idiots inevitably dismissed them or claimed they didn’t happen, but now that those same un-democratic tricks are being used against their fellow Democrats, there’s no way to pretend to deny them.

So let’s talk about voter fraud – specifically, Democrats giving fraudulent returns from the polls on vote results.

We all remember how the national Democrats demanded recounts in select counties in Florida, but what wasn’t as widely reported was that the local Florida Democrats weren’t all that interested in recounts – this is because there’d been some hanky-panky on the local level and the local party bosses knew that recounts would have revealed massive voter fraud being committed by Florida Democrats.

Not current enough?

OK, how’s about the New York primaries?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/nyregion/16vote.html

Black voters are heavily represented in the 94th Election District in Harlem’s 70th Assembly District. Yet according to the unofficial results from the New York Democratic primary last week, not a single vote in the district was cast for Senator Barack Obama.

That anomaly was not unique. In fact, a review by The New York Times of the unofficial results reported on primary night found about 80 election districts among the city’s 6,106 where Mr. Obama supposedly did not receive even one vote, including cases where he ran a respectable race in a nearby district.


So far, Obama has been pulling 85-90% of the black Democrat vote, so the idea that in a heavily black district, he wouldn’t receive a single vote is preposterous.

So how could this problem have occurred?

The history of New York elections has been punctuated by episodes of confusion, incompetence and even occasional corruption.


And New York’s been controlled by Democrats for how long?

But come on now – these are all black voting areas and you’re telling me that “confusion, incompetence” is the probable reason for a black candidate getting ZERO votes?

City election officials said they were convinced that there was nothing sinister to account for the inaccurate initial counts, and The Times’s review found a handful of election districts in the city where Mrs. Clinton received zero votes in the initial results.


So in other words, Democrats were cheating votes for both candidates, because just as it's improbable that Obama would get zero votes in an all black district, it’s equally improbable that Hillary wouldn’t score at least a handful.

Mr. Koenig said he seriously doubted that anything underhanded was at work because local politicians care more about elections that matter specifically to them.

“They steal votes for elections like Assembly District leader
, where people have a personal stake,” he said.


WTF?!?!?

This is NOT a good defense!!!

Can you just imagine interviewing this yahoo?

“Was there voting fraud? Why of course – we steal votes all the time! But don’t worry – we don’t care enough about the national election to steal votes, we only steal votes when we can profit personally from the theft.”

That’s basically what he said – reread the quote if you don’t believe me – go ahead, I’ll wait.

But wait, the crazy statements get worse –

A number of political leaders also scoffed at the possibility that local politicians, even if they considered it vital that Mr. Obama or Mrs. Clinton prevail in the primary, were capable of even trying to hijack such a contest.


WTF?!?!??! (again)

Come on now – Democrats are stupid, but they aren’t that stupid – this nonsense doesn’t even qualify as doublethink - its just bad lying.

So let’s sum up the explanations provided by Democrats as to why Democrat candidates are being cheated out of votes in the Democrat controlled primaries –

1) Democrats are incompetent – they have problems transposing columns of numbers, counting and separating batches of 200-300 votes and properly reading results to the media.

2) Democrats are disorganized – while you and I could sit down and, by ourselves, easily hand count and record 300 votes, reading the results off of a machine is just too complicated for your average Democrat party member at the polls.

3) Democrats do commit voter fraud – yes, Democrats steal votes and cheat elections all of the time, but only for their own personal gain.

4) Democrats are too incompetent to commit voter fraud – sure, local Dems would love to commit voter fraud, but they just aren’t capable of it.

Mind you, this is what Democrats are telling the incredibly liberal New York Times – none of this stuff is coming from conservatives on Fox News – this is the Democrats talking about themselves!

I don’t need to say anything else – the Democrats have done all the work for me.

P.S. Sorry, the mug shot didn't post.

soxfan94's photo
Tue 02/26/08 11:57 PM
leah - it's late and i'm heading to bed, but I'll be sure to check this out tomorrow...seems quite interesting.

adj4u's photo
Wed 02/27/08 02:00 AM
that would make edwards day wouldn't it

laugh laugh laugh

armydoc4u's photo
Wed 02/27/08 02:10 AM
Great posting, obviously I am not a democrat (disclaimer) and I approved this reply....

wow, from the mouths of their own the house of cards have fallen.

And poor edwards left out dancing with himself in the rain, the only canidate that could have even challenged for the whitehouse, seriously thank you new york crime syndicate for returning the whitehouse to us without us even having to grease your pockets, of course now there should be coming soon to a news channel near you, how the republicans stole the new york election. hahahahaha and they say democracy isnt dead.

smo's photo
Wed 02/27/08 10:10 AM
Hey Guys, Do you really think that this same thing did not happen among the Republicans also??? I also do not believe that the American people voted for McCain and his 100 years war either.laugh laugh I will never likely ever believe that McCain won hardly anything. I figure that most any other Republican could honestly beat him on account of his warmonger status. I don't believe there has been an honest election in this country in over 100 years.I think the offspring of the carpetbaggers(look up who the carpetbaggers really were)(how about the rags salesmen) have been running this country for since Abe Lincoln , and even their earlier progeny too. The financial people have been working on overthrowing our Country, elections,etc. for a long ,long,long time. Why did OUR FRIEND (England)(run by KHAZARS) burn our Capital down in the WAR of 1812. I think the KHAZAR money people are behind the whole show, they have been stealing all your elections if possible?? But OBAMA is winning so greatly that ,(large margin) that crookery don't dare to try top him!!It would become too obvious, and I think that it has already come to that point now. Surely ,you do not believe that Hillary won New Hampshire??noway noway noway noway noway noway

MirrorMirror's photo
Wed 02/27/08 10:12 AM
glasses I seen this on the newsglasses