Topic: Things Your Media Momma Didn't Tell You
madisonman's photo
Sun 02/24/08 11:05 AM
The fact that most Americans oppose the war in Iraq, and want the president impeached, is testimony to the native intelligence and common sense of the citizens of this nation.

It sure isn't thanks to the quality of the news we're getting here in America.!

Here are some of the things you don't know if you just depend on the corporate media for your information:


Most Americans would like to see this president and vice president impeached and removed from office. Newsweek magazine published a scientific poll last October showing that 51 percent of us favor impeachment (including 29 percent of Republicans!), but the corporate media, which normally hasn't met a poll it won't publish, didn't publicize this one. And now, when the numbers supporting impeachment are surely even higher, you can't even pay a polling outfit to ask the question. No wonder most people who favor impeachment still think they're odd ducks.


There is a bill, filed in the House of Representatives on April 24 by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), calling for the impeachment of Vice President Cheney. Since it was filed, it has gained six co-sponsors, including a member of the House Democratic leadership, Rep. Janice Shakowsky (D-IL). Most major media have ignored this important story completely. Most Americans also don't know that the Vermont State Senate voted overwhelmingly this spring to call on Congress to impeach the president.


The president has been declared a felon in federal court. Yet even after Federal District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled last August that President Bush and the National Security Agency were committing serial Class A felonies and were violating both the First and Fourth Amendments by spying on Americans' communications without first obtaining warrants, Bush continued ordering the NSA to continue the patently illegal program for at least half a year. In reports on the spying program, the corporate media never mention that it has been declared a felonious activity by the federal court.


Fifteen Democratic Party state organizations have passed impeachment resolutions calling on Democrats in Congress to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president and vice president. The most recent of these, the Democratic Party of Oklahoma, passed its resolution at the party's annual convention on May 19. Other Democratic Party conventions, in states from Nevada and California to Massachusetts and North Carolina, have passed similar resolutions. Most have been ignored by the corporate media even in their own states.


Bush's so-called "coalition of the willing" is not so willing and is not really much of a coalition either. When's the last time you've heard how many countries are on board with the US in the war and occupation of Iraq? The reality? Britain, the only significant contributor of combat troops besides the U.S., is pulling out, as did Italy and Spain, and many other countries, like Denmark, Lithuania and others, plan to be out of Iraq by August or at the latest December. One indication of the seriousness of situation: The Pentagon no longer lists the countries that are members of the "coalition." The only mainstream report I've seen laying this out this collapse in international support for Bush's war was in USA Today last February.


The Homeland Security Department last year awarded Halliburton $385 million in a no-bid contract to construct prison camps designed to hold tens of thousands of unspecified prisoners in the event of domestic unrest. Meanwhile, President Bush has signed a bill altering the insurrection act so that he can declare martial rule and order active duty troops to take charge anywhere in the domestic US in the event of "public disorder." No one in the corporate media has reported on these developments or asked the White House to explain what it's all about.


There is evidence that Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton, was a patron of the Washington Madam whose client book of high-class call-girls is causing many in Washington political circles-mostly Republicans it appears, who apparently need to pay for their sex-to sweat. So far no mention of the Cheney angle in the corporate media, though they've been having fun with the broader story of a political sex scandal. No mention either of how a brave West Point cadet refused to shake Cheney's hand on stage when the vice president was handing out this year's diplomas at the Army's premiere academy.


Among the "worst of the worst" of the "evildoers" captured and held as "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo were children, some of them preteens and kids who were under 15 when captured and brought to Cuba-so many in fact that the military had to set up a special facility, called Camp Iguana, just for adolescent and pre-pubescent "fighters." The corporate media have barely reported on this atrocity (the New York Times ran only one article mentioning child captives, in June 2005). The only wider coverage of this outrage came recently when the government tried to prosecute one such alleged child "terrorist"-Omar Khadr-only to have the military judge in charge toss his case out because the government had misclassified him. Khadr, we learned, was captured in 2001 in Afghanistan at the ripe age of 15, making him one of the older child captives brought to and interrogated at Guantanamo. Under international law, the U.S. was supposed to treat this and other child soldiers as victims, not as war criminals. Khadr, a Canadian by birth, instead has spent five years doing hard time in US captivity.


Well-researched reports on the rampant theft of both the 2000 and 2004 elections, and on Republican plans for theft of the 2008 election, such as Mark Crispin Miller's Fooled Again, have gone unmentioned in the corporate media. Books on the subject, like Miller's and like Greg Palast's best selling Armed Madhouse, have never been reviewed.


And of course, there's my own book. The Case for Impeachment, despite its having sold over 20,000 copies in hardcover, and despite its having now come out in a mass-market paperback edition, in both cases printed by a mainstream publisher, St. Martin's Press, has not received a single review in the corporate media. In this, my co-author Barbara Olshansky and I are not alone. None of the books on the impeachable crimes of this administration, including one by Nixon-era impeachment panelist and former congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman, and one by Judiciary Chair Rep. John Conyers, has been reviewed by a mainstream media outlet.

What we're talking about here is a media blackout of important stories and news.

Thanks to the internet and to the grapevine, and thanks to their basic native intelligence, most Americans seem to understand that we're being lied to and cheated. What the media blackout of important news does manage to do, however, is keep us all thinking that we are in a minority in opposing things like illegal wars, a trampled Constitution, and stolen elections.

In fact, however, we're actually the majority.

Once we realize this, maybe we will have a movement, instead of a just nation of isolated cynics and complainers.


http://www.freemarketnews.com/Analysis/154/7922/lindorff.asp?wid=154&nid=7922


PATSFAN's photo
Sun 02/24/08 11:12 AM
Here we go againsick

madisonman's photo
Sun 02/24/08 11:14 AM

Here we go againsick
no one said you have to read it but if you cant help yourself please leave your comments to the topic.thanksbigsmile

rebel_woman07's photo
Sun 02/24/08 11:14 AM
just to let you know this american realizes that if we pull out of iraq the terrorist will follow us home and bomb the ever living hell out of us, and their govt. will fall in under 5 hours and i support my president so get all the facts right before you go posting something like this please and thank you!

madisonman's photo
Sun 02/24/08 11:17 AM

just to let you know this american realizes that if we pull out of iraq the terrorist will follow us home and bomb the ever living hell out of us, and their govt. will fall in under 5 hours and i support my president so get all the facts right before you go posting something like this please and thank you!
can you back that statement up with any facts?drinker

no photo
Sun 02/24/08 11:19 AM
Most Americans would like to see this president and vice president impeached and removed from office. Newsweek magazine published a scientific poll


wonder who decided it was a "scientific poll" and what was the actual question...noway

madisonman's photo
Sun 02/24/08 11:24 AM
This Newsweek article gives one hell of a spin to its effort not to report what it is reporting, namely that a Newsweek poll finds a majority of Americans wanting impeachment, and half of Democrats wanting it to be a top priority. Read this a few times until you figure out what it's saying:

"Other parts of a potential Democratic agenda receive less support, especially calls to impeach Bush: 47 percent of Democrats say that should be a “top priority,” but only 28 percent of all Americans say it should be, 23 percent say it should be a lower priority and nearly half, 44 percent, say it should not be done. (Five percent of Republicans say it should be a top priority and 15 percent of Republicans say it should be a lower priority; 78 percent oppose impeachment.)"


Dragoness's photo
Sun 02/24/08 11:29 AM
Edited by Dragoness on Sun 02/24/08 12:01 PM

The fact that most Americans oppose the war in Iraq, and want the president impeached, is testimony to the native intelligence and common sense of the citizens of this nation.

It sure isn't thanks to the quality of the news we're getting here in America.!

Here are some of the things you don't know if you just depend on the corporate media for your information:


Most Americans would like to see this president and vice president impeached and removed from office. Newsweek magazine published a scientific poll last October showing that 51 percent of us favor impeachment (including 29 percent of Republicans!), but the corporate media, which normally hasn't met a poll it won't publish, didn't publicize this one. And now, when the numbers supporting impeachment are surely even higher, you can't even pay a polling outfit to ask the question. No wonder most people who favor impeachment still think they're odd ducks.


There is a bill, filed in the House of Representatives on April 24 by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), calling for the impeachment of Vice President Cheney. Since it was filed, it has gained six co-sponsors, including a member of the House Democratic leadership, Rep. Janice Shakowsky (D-IL). Most major media have ignored this important story completely. Most Americans also don't know that the Vermont State Senate voted overwhelmingly this spring to call on Congress to impeach the president.


The president has been declared a felon in federal court. Yet even after Federal District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled last August that President Bush and the National Security Agency were committing serial Class A felonies and were violating both the First and Fourth Amendments by spying on Americans' communications without first obtaining warrants, Bush continued ordering the NSA to continue the patently illegal program for at least half a year. In reports on the spying program, the corporate media never mention that it has been declared a felonious activity by the federal court.


Fifteen Democratic Party state organizations have passed impeachment resolutions calling on Democrats in Congress to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president and vice president. The most recent of these, the Democratic Party of Oklahoma, passed its resolution at the party's annual convention on May 19. Other Democratic Party conventions, in states from Nevada and California to Massachusetts and North Carolina, have passed similar resolutions. Most have been ignored by the corporate media even in their own states.


Bush's so-called "coalition of the willing" is not so willing and is not really much of a coalition either. When's the last time you've heard how many countries are on board with the US in the war and occupation of Iraq? The reality? Britain, the only significant contributor of combat troops besides the U.S., is pulling out, as did Italy and Spain, and many other countries, like Denmark, Lithuania and others, plan to be out of Iraq by August or at the latest December. One indication of the seriousness of situation: The Pentagon no longer lists the countries that are members of the "coalition." The only mainstream report I've seen laying this out this collapse in international support for Bush's war was in USA Today last February.


The Homeland Security Department last year awarded Halliburton $385 million in a no-bid contract to construct prison camps designed to hold tens of thousands of unspecified prisoners in the event of domestic unrest. Meanwhile, President Bush has signed a bill altering the insurrection act so that he can declare martial rule and order active duty troops to take charge anywhere in the domestic US in the event of "public disorder." No one in the corporate media has reported on these developments or asked the White House to explain what it's all about.


There is evidence that Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton, was a patron of the Washington Madam whose client book of high-class call-girls is causing many in Washington political circles-mostly Republicans it appears, who apparently need to pay for their sex-to sweat. So far no mention of the Cheney angle in the corporate media, though they've been having fun with the broader story of a political sex scandal. No mention either of how a brave West Point cadet refused to shake Cheney's hand on stage when the vice president was handing out this year's diplomas at the Army's premiere academy.


Among the "worst of the worst" of the "evildoers" captured and held as "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo were children, some of them preteens and kids who were under 15 when captured and brought to Cuba-so many in fact that the military had to set up a special facility, called Camp Iguana, just for adolescent and pre-pubescent "fighters." The corporate media have barely reported on this atrocity (the New York Times ran only one article mentioning child captives, in June 2005). The only wider coverage of this outrage came recently when the government tried to prosecute one such alleged child "terrorist"-Omar Khadr-only to have the military judge in charge toss his case out because the government had misclassified him. Khadr, we learned, was captured in 2001 in Afghanistan at the ripe age of 15, making him one of the older child captives brought to and interrogated at Guantanamo. Under international law, the U.S. was supposed to treat this and other child soldiers as victims, not as war criminals. Khadr, a Canadian by birth, instead has spent five years doing hard time in US captivity.


Well-researched reports on the rampant theft of both the 2000 and 2004 elections, and on Republican plans for theft of the 2008 election, such as Mark Crispin Miller's Fooled Again, have gone unmentioned in the corporate media. Books on the subject, like Miller's and like Greg Palast's best selling Armed Madhouse, have never been reviewed.


And of course, there's my own book. The Case for Impeachment, despite its having sold over 20,000 copies in hardcover, and despite its having now come out in a mass-market paperback edition, in both cases printed by a mainstream publisher, St. Martin's Press, has not received a single review in the corporate media. In this, my co-author Barbara Olshansky and I are not alone. None of the books on the impeachable crimes of this administration, including one by Nixon-era impeachment panelist and former congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman, and one by Judiciary Chair Rep. John Conyers, has been reviewed by a mainstream media outlet.

What we're talking about here is a media blackout of important stories and news.

Thanks to the internet and to the grapevine, and thanks to their basic native intelligence, most Americans seem to understand that we're being lied to and cheated. What the media blackout of important news does manage to do, however, is keep us all thinking that we are in a minority in opposing things like illegal wars, a trampled Constitution, and stolen elections.

In fact, however, we're actually the majority.

Once we realize this, maybe we will have a movement, instead of a just nation of isolated cynics and complainers.


http://www.freemarketnews.com/Analysis/154/7922/lindorff.asp?wid=154&nid=7922




drinker drinker drinker flowerforyou

I will bet there will be so many on the "right" that will question the statistics. Funny how their statistics should be given credence though huh?

I have known of this for a long time and far too many Americans continue to be brainwashed by this administration and it's back handed policies.

It is too bad toonoway huh

no photo
Sun 02/24/08 11:32 AM
can you back that statement up with any facts?


since facts could only be developed after it takes place we'll have to rely on common sense....guess that leaves you out of the loop huh...laugh

no photo
Sun 02/24/08 11:42 AM
drinker drinker drinker flowerforyou

I will bet there will so many on the "right" that will question the statistics. Funny how their statistics should be given credence though huh?

I have known of this for a long time and far too many Americans continue to be brainwashed by this administration and it's back handed policies.

It is too bad toonoway huh



you are too funny....do you like your nemesis not read anything that you copy and paste....the story came out June 16, 2007 talking about a poll of last October...that would be 2006...old news once again and if it didn't make any waves then it sure won't now...laugh laugh laugh

rebel_woman07's photo
Sun 02/24/08 12:15 PM
can you back that statement up with any facts?
well if they would have done these "polls" in the south the results would have been completely different i am sorry that the liberals control the media so they therefore make it seem that way

madisonman's photo
Sun 02/24/08 12:56 PM
Edited by madisonman on Sun 02/24/08 01:05 PM

drinker drinker drinker flowerforyou

I will bet there will so many on the "right" that will question the statistics. Funny how their statistics should be given credence though huh?

I have known of this for a long time and far too many Americans continue to be brainwashed by this administration and it's back handed policies.

It is too bad toonoway huh



you are too funny....do you like your nemesis not read anything that you copy and paste....the story came out June 16, 2007 talking about a poll of last October...that would be 2006...old news once again and if it didn't make any waves then it sure won't now...laugh laugh laugh
I hardly think things have improved but if you have a more current poll feel free to bring it forward.

smo's photo
Sun 02/24/08 02:04 PM
What they did not tell you in the Media? ON Super Tuesday, you as a nation decided whom you want as President. When the presence is felt, the polling tricks, and false tabulating practices of the Elite stand out like a sore thumb. They look ridiculous as they try to explain away what your eyes see and that those "New Numbers" do not add up. In the bright light of day, the liars lose their ability to hide the true demand of the people.--NO ONE WHO REALLY WANTS THEIR NATION BACK SHOULD BE SITTING ON THE SIDELINES>!!

Vote Obama!!

smo's photo
Sun 02/24/08 02:20 PM
Barack Obama wins EVERY TIME!!!(this is not in your news)

There is no longer a contest as far as the elite are concerned.They know he is destined to be the United States President; it has already happened. Their only thrust is to cause you to think the race is close or that Hillary or the other candidates are getting your votes.--even though every other indication is to the contrary. You are witnessing the final battle at the ending of the cycle change for possession of your souls...... Making you see or believe something that is not real is the hallmark of any good magician., and the Zionist KHAZAR Jews of Hollywood and the world media are the experts!!

inf from CONTACT Magazine

smo's photo
Sun 02/24/08 02:27 PM
The media has not found a way to explain away those large crowds that Obama is getting that fill up arenas and spill out into the streets. While hillaries supposed supporters boo her publicly right to her face.

It is not like the media wants you to think.drinker drinker drinker laugh laugh

noblenan's photo
Sun 02/24/08 02:52 PM
smo

All of those things are staged! The campaigns situate things to look the way they want them perceived through the media by the public. If so called "Hillary supporters" booed her, they were plants or spoilers.
Nan drinker smokin