Previous 1
Topic: Deanna Farve to Start for Packers
gardenforge's photo
Mon 12/31/07 04:39 PM
In a news conference Deanna Favre announced she will be the
starting QB for the Packers this coming Sunday. She claimed she is qualified to be starting QB because she has spent the past 16 years married to Brett while he played QB for the Packers. Because of this she understands how to pick up a corner blitz and knows the terminology of the Packers offense.

Do you think a poll of Packers fans would show that 50% of those polled supported the move? Does this sound idiotic and unbelievable to you?

Yet Hillary Clinton makes the same claims as to why she is
qualified to be President and 50% of democrats polled agreed.

And, sadly the other 50% support an individual who is in his first term of holding a seat in the Senate, knows nothing of being Commander in Chief, attended early schooling in a Wahabbi Muslim school, disrespects the flag of our country, and states he is a "Christian" because he found that God and Scripture coincide with the "values he held!"

So, you now have the far majority of Democrats supporting the
Hildabeast, the most vile and vulgar mouthed woman to have graced the White House as First Lady (documented fact), or an unbelievably inexperienced individual who was raised Muslim. Truman, Kennedy, and Humphrey must be spinning in their graves, along with the 3000 victims of the World Trade Center attack.

don4169's photo
Mon 12/31/07 04:42 PM
excellently put gardenforge.
may be, just maybe soeone will understand the comparison.

Robm248's photo
Mon 12/31/07 04:53 PM
Sad to say, our choices are about as good as picking between getting kicked by a horse and a mule. Frankly I would love to see a move to place an honest, blue collar man who would actually care about what he did to everyone in the country rather than his public image in the office. I've met some good people who were politicians. However, they were in the minority and often frustrated with the other people who were in office.
One of the biggest issues with this is that the kind of person who would do this is in general not interested in taking a political office. I'm thinking I might vote write in this time. Maybe for the next fourth grader I can find as they would probably do a better job just by listening to 'mommy' and 'daddy'.
Sorry, just don't like my other options!laugh

damnitscloudy's photo
Mon 12/31/07 04:54 PM
DON'T SCARE ME LIKE THAT I thought it was real lol. I was going to set fire to my cheese hat laugh

Anyway, Hillary seems most qualified for the dems (and thats not saying much either), and the cons just can't seem to get behind anyone besides Huckabee or Romney (both whom scare me as much as Hillary.)

Its going to be a loooonnnggg 4 years after next years elections noway

Wolfshado's photo
Mon 12/31/07 05:01 PM
wow.... i guess you would rather have some guy in office that would kill thousands of innocents because he wants to "make Daddy Proud", has NO problem sending just out of high school kids off to the desert to be killed for no reason, and someone that wiped out a 3 trillion dollar SURPLUS just because "that bad man tried to kill my daddy"

to each thier own

trivee's photo
Mon 12/31/07 05:04 PM
so if it was down to Ron Paul or John Edwards who would you go with?

cutelildevilsmom's photo
Mon 12/31/07 05:08 PM
Edith Bolling Galt Wilson

"Secret President," "first woman to run the government" -- so legend has labeled a First Lady whose role gained unusual significance when her husband suffered prolonged and disabling illness. A happy, protected childhood and first marriage had prepared Edith Wilson for the duties of helpmate and hostess; widowhood had taught her something of business matters.

Descendant of Virginia aristocracy, she was born in Wytheville in 1872, seventh among eleven children of Sallie White and Judge William Holcombe Bolling. Until the age of 12 she never left the town; at 15 she went to Martha Washington College to study music, with a second year at a smaller school in Richmond.


Visiting a married sister in Washington, pretty young Edith met a businessman named Norman Galt; in 1896 they were married. For 12 years she lived as a contented (though childless) young matron in the capital, with vacations abroad. In 1908 her husband died unexpectedly. Shrewdly, Edith Galt chose a good manager who operated the family's jewelry firm with financial success.

By a quirk of fate and a chain of friendships, Mrs. Galt met the bereaved President, still mourning profoundly for his first wife. A man who depended on feminine companionship, the lonely Wilson took an instant liking to Mrs. Galt, charming and intelligent and unusually pretty. Admiration changed swiftly to love. In proposing to her, he made the poignant statement that "in this place time is not measured by weeks, or months, or years, but by deep human experiences..." They were married privately on December 18, 1915, at her home; and after they returned from a brief honeymoon in Virginia, their happiness made a vivid impression on their friends and White House staff.

Though the new First Lady had sound qualifications for the role of hostess, the social aspect of the administration was overshadowed by the war in Europe and abandoned after the United States entered the conflict in 1917. Edith Wilson submerged her own life in her husband's, trying to keep him fit under tremendous strain. She accompanied him to Europe when the Allies conferred on terms of peace.

Wilson returned to campaign for Senate approval of the peace treaty and the League of Nations Covenant. His health failed in September 1919; a stroke left him partly paralyzed. His constant attendant, Mrs. Wilson took over many routine duties and details of government. But she did not initiate programs or make major decisions, and she did not try to control the executive branch. She selected matters for her husband's attention and let everything else go to the heads of departments or remain in abeyance. Her "stewardship," she called this. And in My Memoir, published in 1939, she stated emphatically that her husband's doctors had urged this course upon her.

In 1921, the Wilsons retired to a comfortable home in Washington, where he died three years later. A highly respected figure in the society of the capital, Mrs. Wilson lived on to ride in President Kennedy's inaugural parade. She died later in 1961: on December 28, the anniversary of her famous husband's birth.



Well I guess it isnt that far fetched...laugh

Robm248's photo
Mon 12/31/07 05:09 PM

wow.... i guess you would rather have some guy in office that would kill thousands of innocents because he wants to "make Daddy Proud", has NO problem sending just out of high school kids off to the desert to be killed for no reason, and someone that wiped out a 3 trillion dollar SURPLUS just because "that bad man tried to kill my daddy"

to each thier own


laugh No. But as for the above mentioned: that SURPLUS would have been wasted by our inept government and their status quo which states that if they don't use the money they lose the money. Also, the candidates mentioned would spend it: A. By buying everyone so much health care insurance via U.S. govenment insurance that all the current health insurance companies would die out, thus resulting in more people on unemployment and wellfare... and spending even more. B. Pocketing it while 'funding' more programs. C. Following your own statement above.

Finally: STOP LISTENING TO THE MEDIA BS! Do some research on what these people stand for and what they have really done before you form your opinion. I'm sick of everyone just blaring the same old same old based on what the news has said. There's a world of information out there that contradicts over half of what the news states.

cutelildevilsmom's photo
Mon 12/31/07 05:14 PM
As long as tthey dont shut down the government cheese program..laugh

Wolfshado's photo
Mon 12/31/07 05:26 PM


wow.... i guess you would rather have some guy in office that would kill thousands of innocents because he wants to "make Daddy Proud", has NO problem sending just out of high school kids off to the desert to be killed for no reason, and someone that wiped out a 3 trillion dollar SURPLUS just because "that bad man tried to kill my daddy"

to each thier own


laugh No. But as for the above mentioned: that SURPLUS would have been wasted by our inept government and their status quo which states that if they don't use the money they lose the money. Also, the candidates mentioned would spend it: A. By buying everyone so much health care insurance via U.S. govenment insurance that all the current health insurance companies would die out, thus resulting in more people on unemployment and wellfare... and spending even more. B. Pocketing it while 'funding' more programs. C. Following your own statement above.

Finally: STOP LISTENING TO THE MEDIA BS! Do some research on what these people stand for and what they have really done before you form your opinion. I'm sick of everyone just blaring the same old same old based on what the news has said. There's a world of information out there that contradicts over half of what the news states.
[/quote

believe it or not, some of us actually hated this man LONG before the Media started to pick up on the bandwagon.

Do i HONESTLY believe Hil is whats best for this country? No.

But compared to what we have now.... i would rather have a hundred Hil's to one Burning Bush. I hate that man for SOOOOO many more reasons than the Media lets on. Some of us KNOW him personally, and have our own reasons for hating him so.

Robm248's photo
Mon 12/31/07 05:56 PM
Ouch Wolf... I can't believe that anyone would prefer Hillary to just about anything other than say: Stalin, Hitler, or maybe a Sadam Husein. I won't argue with any personal knowledge you have of him. However, please at least read some of the Democratic parties opinions of Hillary before stating that. Half of them hate her. She scares them. If she scares them more than Bush does, how much should we fear her possible election?

buttons's photo
Mon 12/31/07 07:31 PM
noway noway noway where is fanta?noway noway :cry: :cry:

cutelildevilsmom's photo
Mon 12/31/07 08:13 PM

noway noway noway where is fanta?noway noway :cry: :cry:

i've been wondering that very same thing..:cry:

Jtevans's photo
Mon 12/31/07 11:58 PM
TAG

winnie410's photo
Tue 01/01/08 12:15 AM
TAG

chevylover1965's photo
Tue 01/01/08 12:17 AM
TAG

OrangeCat's photo
Tue 01/01/08 12:18 AM
TAG

AaronzDad's photo
Tue 01/01/08 12:35 AM
TAG

OrangeCat's photo
Tue 01/01/08 12:43 AM
TAG

dartdog_64's photo
Tue 01/01/08 12:51 AM
im voting for mickey mouse.... Just noone worth a dam to vote for this time around... i agree its going to be a longggg 4 years.

Previous 1