Hillary Clinton and former Australian PM Julia Gillard
The FBI has asked retired Australian policeman-turned investigative journalist, Michael Smith, to provide information he has gathered detailing multiple allegations of the Clinton Foundation receiving tens of millions of mishandled taxpayer funds, according to LifeZette.

"I have been asked to provide the FBI with further and better particulars about allegations regarding improper donations to the CF funded by Australian taxpayers," Smith told LifeZette.

Of note, the Clinton Foundation received some $88 million from Australian taxpayers between 2006 and 2014, reaching its peak in 2012-2013 - which was coincidentally (we're sure) Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard's last year in office.

Smith names several key figures in his complaints of malfeasance, including Bill and Hillary Clinton and multiple Australian government officials - including senior diplomat Alexander Downer, whose conversation with Trump aide George Papadopoulos that Russia had 'dirt' on Hillary Clinton allegedly launched the Trump-Russia investigation (as opposed to the Fusion GPS dossier, of course).

Alexander Downer
© John Feder/The Australian
Australia's High Commissioner to Britain, Alexander Downer.
Within hours of the NYT publication, the paper was immediately shredded as the information Papadopoulous told Downer was already public.

The materials Smith is giving to the FBI focus on a 2007 memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Clinton Foundation's HIV/AIDs Initiative (CHAI) and the Australian government.

Smith claims the foundation received a "$25M financial advantage dishonestly obtained by deception" as a result of actions by Bill Clinton and Downer, who was then Australia's minister of foreign affairs.

Also included in the Smith materials are evidence he believes shows "corrupt October 2006 backdating of false tender advertisements purporting to advertise the availability of a $15 million contract to provide HIV/AIDS services in Papua New Guinea on behalf of the Australian government after an agreement was already in place to pay the Clinton Foundation and/or associates."-Lifezette

As a reminder, the Australian government announced that they would stop pouring millions of dollars into accounts linked to the Clinton charities in November of 2016 - right after Hillary Clinton lost the election.

The federal government confirmed to news.com.au it has not renewed any of its partnerships with the scandal-plagued Clinton Foundation, effectively ending 10 years of taxpayer-funded contributions worth more than $88 million.

The Clinton Foundation has a rocky past. It was described as "a slush fund", is still at the centre of an FBI investigation and was revealed to have spent more than $50 million on travel.

Despite that, the official website for the charity shows contributions from both AUSAID and the Commonwealth of Australia, each worth between $10 million and $25 million.

(Norway, coincidentally, also reduced its $20 million / year donations to the Clinton Foundation right after Hillary's loss.)

A third complaint by Smith revolves around a "$10 million financial advantage dishonestly obtained by deception between April 1, 2008, and Sept. 25, 2008, at Washington, D.C., New York, New York, and Canberra Australia involving an MOU between the Australian government, the "Clinton Climate Initiative," and the purported "Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute Inc."

When asked why the Clinton Foundation was chosen as a recipient of Australian taxpayer dollars, a spokesman for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said that all funding was used "solely for agreed development projects" and Clinton charities have "a proven track record" in helping developing countries.


Proven track record? Is that in writing somewhere?

webpage here

Crickets..really ..The masses are stunned ... Complete shock ..

I suppose in their eyes nothing could be worse than Trump..Guess what...

Before Hilary became a U.S. Senator from N.Y., her " scout team" analyzed every region and area where they thought she would have a shot at winning. NYC politics at that time was weak.. and she won

Being a New Yorker, I can tell you she knew nothing about what people from NYC needed.. nothing.

She was a carpetbagger, only using NYC as a stepping stone.. she could really care less about the residents

Oh and BTW, the first stop she made once being sworn in was to Wall Street.. hat in hand. And it is well documented how much she raised there for the " Clinton foundation"

Haven't we all learned never to trust a Clinton?

I'm not talking Dems.. I'm talking Clintons.

seems quiet in here

what the hell are my australian tax dollars doing going to some seppo politicians???

It's bad enough we have to watch their rubbish TV shows and 'news' stories repeated ad-nauseum, but giving them our money - my blood boils.

Who benefited from this misappropriation of funds ?

I hope no cigars were purchased.

Of course it is to be expected, mainly self serving egotistical individuals gravitate to politics, and of course they 'deserve' special treatment because they are special people, and they are always scratching each other's backs and greasing each others palms. And money is no object when it is someone else's money.

Guess you know how we feel in this country. Well I mean we the one's that aren't being spoon fed bs and loving it.