100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: Dobbs: Clinton is corrupt to the core | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
SassyEuro2
on
Tue 06/07/16 03:28 PM
|
|
I seen this. This was great!!
I am glad he made the point, about H. Clinton, NOT appearing at all, as an independent woman. Geez.. Bill will be handling the money. And Barrack will be handling her campaign. *She might as well go to lunch & get her nails done. * 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is sad that we have come down to the choices we have for President.
This is what happens when gullible voters out number the wise voters. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinton is corrupt to the core Doesn't seem to matter to her supporters. A recent Rasmussen poll shows the 71% of dems think sHitllary should keep running even if she is indicted for the email scandal....
""Among Democratic voters, 71% believe Clinton should keep running...."" http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/may_2016/50_say_clinton_should_keep_running_even_if_indicted ...of course, this tends to support alleoops point about gullible voters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Her supporters don't give a damn,and that is the frightening part about it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If I read one more time, something ludicrous like ' It is TIME for a woman to be in the White House', I may throw my phone.
How much have we dummied down, that such a large population, thinks like this.. about The Presidency of The United States of America? Where is this rule book? A black man A woman A Hispanic A Transgender
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2016/06/06/npr-reporter-women-weep-over-history-making-hillary-clinton/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, again, I don't like Clinton either. But I also don't like people pushing me to accept their personal derision, as factual data.
Dobbs is just another pundit, venting opinions based on the same mix of propaganda, political and personal bias, and differing agendas that everyone has. I used to like his financial rants too, until I realized he's another of the we-have-too-many-already kvetchers on the right and on the left, who really just suck money out of the economy for themselves by whining ignorantly and angrily. He doesn't know any more of what he pretends to know, than any other modern "rant star." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, again, I don't like Clinton either. But I also don't like people pushing me to accept their personal derision, as factual data. Dobbs is just another pundit, venting opinions based on the same mix of propaganda, political and personal bias, and differing agendas that everyone has. I used to like his financial rants too, until I realized he's another of the we-have-too-many-already kvetchers on the right and on the left, who really just suck money out of the economy for themselves by whining ignorantly and angrily. He doesn't know any more of what he pretends to know, than any other modern "rant star." well,feast your eyes on this Igor! http://intellectualfroglegs.com/new-york-times-1996-first-lady-congenital-liar/ New York Times 1996: “Our First Lady… is a Congenital Liar” http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/08/opinion/essay-blizzard-of-lies.html Essay;Blizzard of Lies By WILLIAM SAFIRE Published: January 8, 1996 Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar. Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit. 1. Remember the story she told about studying The Wall Street Journal to explain her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading? We now know that was a lie told to turn aside accusations that as the Governor's wife she profited corruptly, her account being run by a lawyer for state poultry interests through a disreputable broker. She lied for good reason: To admit otherwise would be to confess taking, and paying taxes on, what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe. 2. The abuse of Presidential power known as Travelgate elicited another series of lies. She induced a White House lawyer to assert flatly to investigators that Mrs. Clinton did not order the firing of White House travel aides, who were then harassed by the F.B.I. and Justice Department to justify patronage replacement by Mrs. Clinton's cronies. Now we know, from a memo long concealed from investigators, that there would be "hell to pay" if the furious First Lady's desires were scorned. The career of the lawyer who transmitted Hillary's lie to authorities is now in jeopardy. Again, she lied with good reason: to avoid being identified as a vindictive political power player who used the F.B.I. to ruin the lives of people standing in the way of juicy patronage. 3. In the aftermath of the apparent suicide of her former partner and closest confidant, White House Deputy Counsel Vincent Foster, she ordered the overturn of an agreement to allow the Justice Department to examine the files in the dead man's office. Her closest friends and aides, under oath, have been blatantly disremembering this likely obstruction of justice, and may have to pay for supporting Hillary's lie with jail terms. Again, the lying was not irrational. Investigators believe that damning records from the Rose Law Firm, wrongfully kept in Vincent Foster's White House office, were spirited out in the dead of night and hidden from the law for two years -- in Hillary's closet, in Web Hubbell's basement before his felony conviction, in the President's secretary's personal files -- before some were forced out last week. Why the White House concealment? For good reason: The records show Hillary Clinton was lying when she denied actively representing a criminal enterprise known as the Madison S.& L., and indicate she may have conspired with Web Hubbell's father-in-law to make a sham land deal that cost taxpayers $3 million. Why the belated release of some of the incriminating evidence? Not because it mysteriously turned up in offices previously searched. Certainly not because Hillary Clinton and her new hang-tough White House counsel want to respond fully to lawful subpoenas. One reason for the Friday-night dribble of evidence from the White House is the discovery by the F.B.I. of copies of some of those records elsewhere. When Clinton witnesses are asked about specific items in "lost" records -- which investigators have -- the White House "finds" its copy and releases it. By concealing the Madison billing records two days beyond the statute of limitations, Hillary evaded a civil suit by bamboozled bank regulators. Another reason for recent revelations is the imminent turning of former aides and partners of Hillary against her; they were willing to cover her lying when it advanced their careers, but are inclined to listen to their own lawyers when faced with perjury indictments. Therefore, ask not "Why didn't she just come clean at the beginning?" She had good reasons to lie; she is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends. No wonder the President is fearful of holding a prime-time press conference. Having been separately deposed by the independent counsel at least twice, the President and First Lady would be well advised to retain separate defense counsel. some People knew she is a congenital Liar well back,some People are catching on now,and some never will! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is sad that we have come down to the choices we have for President. This is what happens when gullible voters out number the wise voters.
No! This what happens when 'wise voters' don't vote! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, again, I don't like Clinton either. But I also don't like people pushing me to accept their personal derision, as factual data. Dobbs is just another pundit, venting opinions based on the same mix of propaganda, political and personal bias, and differing agendas that everyone has. I used to like his financial rants too, until I realized he's another of the we-have-too-many-already kvetchers on the right and on the left, who really just suck money out of the economy for themselves by whining ignorantly and angrily. He doesn't know any more of what he pretends to know, than any other modern "rant star." well,feast your eyes on this Igor! http://intellectualfroglegs.com/new-york-times-1996-first-lady-congenital-liar/ New York Times 1996: “Our First Lady… is a Congenital Liar” http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/08/opinion/essay-blizzard-of-lies.html Essay;Blizzard of Lies By WILLIAM SAFIRE Published: January 8, 1996 Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar. Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit. 1. Remember the story she told about studying The Wall Street Journal to explain her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading? We now know that was a lie told to turn aside accusations that as the Governor's wife she profited corruptly, her account being run by a lawyer for state poultry interests through a disreputable broker. She lied for good reason: To admit otherwise would be to confess taking, and paying taxes on, what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe. 2. The abuse of Presidential power known as Travelgate elicited another series of lies. She induced a White House lawyer to assert flatly to investigators that Mrs. Clinton did not order the firing of White House travel aides, who were then harassed by the F.B.I. and Justice Department to justify patronage replacement by Mrs. Clinton's cronies. Now we know, from a memo long concealed from investigators, that there would be "hell to pay" if the furious First Lady's desires were scorned. The career of the lawyer who transmitted Hillary's lie to authorities is now in jeopardy. Again, she lied with good reason: to avoid being identified as a vindictive political power player who used the F.B.I. to ruin the lives of people standing in the way of juicy patronage. 3. In the aftermath of the apparent suicide of her former partner and closest confidant, White House Deputy Counsel Vincent Foster, she ordered the overturn of an agreement to allow the Justice Department to examine the files in the dead man's office. Her closest friends and aides, under oath, have been blatantly disremembering this likely obstruction of justice, and may have to pay for supporting Hillary's lie with jail terms. Again, the lying was not irrational. Investigators believe that damning records from the Rose Law Firm, wrongfully kept in Vincent Foster's White House office, were spirited out in the dead of night and hidden from the law for two years -- in Hillary's closet, in Web Hubbell's basement before his felony conviction, in the President's secretary's personal files -- before some were forced out last week. Why the White House concealment? For good reason: The records show Hillary Clinton was lying when she denied actively representing a criminal enterprise known as the Madison S.& L., and indicate she may have conspired with Web Hubbell's father-in-law to make a sham land deal that cost taxpayers $3 million. Why the belated release of some of the incriminating evidence? Not because it mysteriously turned up in offices previously searched. Certainly not because Hillary Clinton and her new hang-tough White House counsel want to respond fully to lawful subpoenas. One reason for the Friday-night dribble of evidence from the White House is the discovery by the F.B.I. of copies of some of those records elsewhere. When Clinton witnesses are asked about specific items in "lost" records -- which investigators have -- the White House "finds" its copy and releases it. By concealing the Madison billing records two days beyond the statute of limitations, Hillary evaded a civil suit by bamboozled bank regulators. Another reason for recent revelations is the imminent turning of former aides and partners of Hillary against her; they were willing to cover her lying when it advanced their careers, but are inclined to listen to their own lawyers when faced with perjury indictments. Therefore, ask not "Why didn't she just come clean at the beginning?" She had good reasons to lie; she is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends. No wonder the President is fearful of holding a prime-time press conference. Having been separately deposed by the independent counsel at least twice, the President and First Lady would be well advised to retain separate defense counsel. some People knew she is a congenital Liar well back,some People are catching on now,and some never will! Yeah, as I said, Dobbs is one of a crowd of such fuss-salesmen. You've listed and quoted a couple more. Same thing. Some people think that while one person spouting an opinion is just an opinion, that five or more people spouting the same opinion, turns it into a fact. But it doesn't. These are all just professional whiners, getting people like you to cheer, so that they get paid more. I'm glad they are giving you a good time, but that doesn't make them anything more than opinion-spewers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, again, I don't like Clinton either. But I also don't like people pushing me to accept their personal derision, as factual data. Dobbs is just another pundit, venting opinions based on the same mix of propaganda, political and personal bias, and differing agendas that everyone has. I used to like his financial rants too, until I realized he's another of the we-have-too-many-already kvetchers on the right and on the left, who really just suck money out of the economy for themselves by whining ignorantly and angrily. He doesn't know any more of what he pretends to know, than any other modern "rant star." well,feast your eyes on this Igor! http://intellectualfroglegs.com/new-york-times-1996-first-lady-congenital-liar/ New York Times 1996: “Our First Lady… is a Congenital Liar” http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/08/opinion/essay-blizzard-of-lies.html Essay;Blizzard of Lies By WILLIAM SAFIRE Published: January 8, 1996 Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar. Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit. 1. Remember the story she told about studying The Wall Street Journal to explain her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading? We now know that was a lie told to turn aside accusations that as the Governor's wife she profited corruptly, her account being run by a lawyer for state poultry interests through a disreputable broker. She lied for good reason: To admit otherwise would be to confess taking, and paying taxes on, what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe. 2. The abuse of Presidential power known as Travelgate elicited another series of lies. She induced a White House lawyer to assert flatly to investigators that Mrs. Clinton did not order the firing of White House travel aides, who were then harassed by the F.B.I. and Justice Department to justify patronage replacement by Mrs. Clinton's cronies. Now we know, from a memo long concealed from investigators, that there would be "hell to pay" if the furious First Lady's desires were scorned. The career of the lawyer who transmitted Hillary's lie to authorities is now in jeopardy. Again, she lied with good reason: to avoid being identified as a vindictive political power player who used the F.B.I. to ruin the lives of people standing in the way of juicy patronage. 3. In the aftermath of the apparent suicide of her former partner and closest confidant, White House Deputy Counsel Vincent Foster, she ordered the overturn of an agreement to allow the Justice Department to examine the files in the dead man's office. Her closest friends and aides, under oath, have been blatantly disremembering this likely obstruction of justice, and may have to pay for supporting Hillary's lie with jail terms. Again, the lying was not irrational. Investigators believe that damning records from the Rose Law Firm, wrongfully kept in Vincent Foster's White House office, were spirited out in the dead of night and hidden from the law for two years -- in Hillary's closet, in Web Hubbell's basement before his felony conviction, in the President's secretary's personal files -- before some were forced out last week. Why the White House concealment? For good reason: The records show Hillary Clinton was lying when she denied actively representing a criminal enterprise known as the Madison S.& L., and indicate she may have conspired with Web Hubbell's father-in-law to make a sham land deal that cost taxpayers $3 million. Why the belated release of some of the incriminating evidence? Not because it mysteriously turned up in offices previously searched. Certainly not because Hillary Clinton and her new hang-tough White House counsel want to respond fully to lawful subpoenas. One reason for the Friday-night dribble of evidence from the White House is the discovery by the F.B.I. of copies of some of those records elsewhere. When Clinton witnesses are asked about specific items in "lost" records -- which investigators have -- the White House "finds" its copy and releases it. By concealing the Madison billing records two days beyond the statute of limitations, Hillary evaded a civil suit by bamboozled bank regulators. Another reason for recent revelations is the imminent turning of former aides and partners of Hillary against her; they were willing to cover her lying when it advanced their careers, but are inclined to listen to their own lawyers when faced with perjury indictments. Therefore, ask not "Why didn't she just come clean at the beginning?" She had good reasons to lie; she is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends. No wonder the President is fearful of holding a prime-time press conference. Having been separately deposed by the independent counsel at least twice, the President and First Lady would be well advised to retain separate defense counsel. some People knew she is a congenital Liar well back,some People are catching on now,and some never will! Yeah, as I said, Dobbs is one of a crowd of such fuss-salesmen. You've listed and quoted a couple more. Same thing. Some people think that while one person spouting an opinion is just an opinion, that five or more people spouting the same opinion, turns it into a fact. But it doesn't. These are all just professional whiners, getting people like you to cheer, so that they get paid more. I'm glad they are giving you a good time, but that doesn't make them anything more than opinion-spewers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if she were a Tuna,she would be Rotten to the Albacore!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has promised a big leak of Hillary Clinton emails is coming soon that he says should contain “enough evidence” to indict Hillary Clinton. However, Assange doesn’t believe there will actually be an indictment, questioning the relationship between Clinton and federal authorities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americans have VERY short memories. Hillary, with Bill, should be in prison not the next probable president. It's like watching a train wreck stuck in the never ending ground hog day loop. Please make it stop!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, again, I don't like Clinton either. But I also don't like people pushing me to accept their personal derision, as factual data. Dobbs is just another pundit, venting opinions based on the same mix of propaganda, political and personal bias, and differing agendas that everyone has. I used to like his financial rants too, until I realized he's another of the we-have-too-many-already kvetchers on the right and on the left, who really just suck money out of the economy for themselves by whining ignorantly and angrily. He doesn't know any more of what he pretends to know, than any other modern "rant star." well,feast your eyes on this Igor! http://intellectualfroglegs.com/new-york-times-1996-first-lady-congenital-liar/ New York Times 1996: “Our First Lady… is a Congenital Liar” http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/08/opinion/essay-blizzard-of-lies.html Essay;Blizzard of Lies By WILLIAM SAFIRE Published: January 8, 1996 Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar. Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit. 1. Remember the story she told about studying The Wall Street Journal to explain her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading? We now know that was a lie told to turn aside accusations that as the Governor's wife she profited corruptly, her account being run by a lawyer for state poultry interests through a disreputable broker. She lied for good reason: To admit otherwise would be to confess taking, and paying taxes on, what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe. 2. The abuse of Presidential power known as Travelgate elicited another series of lies. She induced a White House lawyer to assert flatly to investigators that Mrs. Clinton did not order the firing of White House travel aides, who were then harassed by the F.B.I. and Justice Department to justify patronage replacement by Mrs. Clinton's cronies. Now we know, from a memo long concealed from investigators, that there would be "hell to pay" if the furious First Lady's desires were scorned. The career of the lawyer who transmitted Hillary's lie to authorities is now in jeopardy. Again, she lied with good reason: to avoid being identified as a vindictive political power player who used the F.B.I. to ruin the lives of people standing in the way of juicy patronage. 3. In the aftermath of the apparent suicide of her former partner and closest confidant, White House Deputy Counsel Vincent Foster, she ordered the overturn of an agreement to allow the Justice Department to examine the files in the dead man's office. Her closest friends and aides, under oath, have been blatantly disremembering this likely obstruction of justice, and may have to pay for supporting Hillary's lie with jail terms. Again, the lying was not irrational. Investigators believe that damning records from the Rose Law Firm, wrongfully kept in Vincent Foster's White House office, were spirited out in the dead of night and hidden from the law for two years -- in Hillary's closet, in Web Hubbell's basement before his felony conviction, in the President's secretary's personal files -- before some were forced out last week. Why the White House concealment? For good reason: The records show Hillary Clinton was lying when she denied actively representing a criminal enterprise known as the Madison S.& L., and indicate she may have conspired with Web Hubbell's father-in-law to make a sham land deal that cost taxpayers $3 million. Why the belated release of some of the incriminating evidence? Not because it mysteriously turned up in offices previously searched. Certainly not because Hillary Clinton and her new hang-tough White House counsel want to respond fully to lawful subpoenas. One reason for the Friday-night dribble of evidence from the White House is the discovery by the F.B.I. of copies of some of those records elsewhere. When Clinton witnesses are asked about specific items in "lost" records -- which investigators have -- the White House "finds" its copy and releases it. By concealing the Madison billing records two days beyond the statute of limitations, Hillary evaded a civil suit by bamboozled bank regulators. Another reason for recent revelations is the imminent turning of former aides and partners of Hillary against her; they were willing to cover her lying when it advanced their careers, but are inclined to listen to their own lawyers when faced with perjury indictments. Therefore, ask not "Why didn't she just come clean at the beginning?" She had good reasons to lie; she is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends. No wonder the President is fearful of holding a prime-time press conference. Having been separately deposed by the independent counsel at least twice, the President and First Lady would be well advised to retain separate defense counsel. some People knew she is a congenital Liar well back,some People are catching on now,and some never will! Yeah, as I said, Dobbs is one of a crowd of such fuss-salesmen. You've listed and quoted a couple more. Same thing. Some people think that while one person spouting an opinion is just an opinion, that five or more people spouting the same opinion, turns it into a fact. But it doesn't. These are all just professional whiners, getting people like you to cheer, so that they get paid more. I'm glad they are giving you a good time, but that doesn't make them anything more than opinion-spewers. Well, no, they aren't, but I know that most people don't have the training or discipline on how to pay proper attention, and recognize the difference between a statement of proven fact, and what these are, which are OPINIONS ONLY, that the whiners deduced (without supporting logic). What most people do, especially those you listed, is the equivalent of deciding to bake a cake, but adding all manner of things that happen to be lying around their own messy kitchen, before shoving the mixture of garbage into the oven. When it comes out disgusting, they claim the original recipe was to blame. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if she were a Tuna,she would be Rotten to the Albacore! 
|
|
|
|
|
