Topic: footage of smallest nuke ever... | |
---|---|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Wed 05/04/16 08:07 AM
|
|
Fact is we dont and cant know where they are at on the nuke scene. The A bomb was fiction until they leveled Hiroshima with it. Then its hey surprise look what we have.
The madm's and sadm's are ancient technology by todays standards. One gram of fully charged hafnium isomer could store more energy than 50 kilograms of TNT. Miniature missiles could be made with warheads that are far more powerful than existing conventional weapons, giving massively enhanced firepower to the armed forces using them.
The effect of a nuclear-isomer explosion would be to release high-energy gamma rays capable of killing any living thing in the immediate area. It would cause little fallout compared to a fission explosion, but any undetonated isomer would be dispersed as small radioactive particles, making it a somewhat “dirty” bomb. This material could cause long-term health problems for anybody who breathed it in. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4049-gamma-ray-weapons-could-trigger-next-arms-race/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafnium and 178m2Hf is a particularly attractive candidate for induced gamma emission (IGE) experiments, because of its high density of stored energy, 2.5 MeV per nucleus, and long 31-year half life for storing that energy. If radiation from some agent could "trigger" a release of that stored energy, the resulting cascade of gamma photons would have the best chance of finding a pair of excited states with the inverted lifetimes needed for stimulated emission. While induced emission adds only power to a radiation field, stimulated emission adds coherence. The possibility to manipulate gamma ray coherence, even to a small degree, would be interesting.[4] The lifetime of the hafnium isomer is long enough for tractable amounts of material to be collected into experimental targets. Such samples would hold no hazards for personnel working with the material; 1 microgram of 178m2Hf has an activity of 1.5 megabecquerels (41 microcuries). A proposal to test the efficacy for "triggering" 178m2Hf was approved by a NATO-Advanced Research Workshop (NATO-ARW) held in Predeal in 1995.[5] Although the proposal was to use incident protons to bombard the target, α-particles were available when the first experiment was scheduled. It was done by a French, Russian, Romanian and American team. Results were said [6] to be extraordinary, but the results were not published. Nevertheless, 178m2Hf was implied to be of special importance to potential applications of IGE. A controversy quickly erupted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafnium_controversy Then dont forget any of these fissile devices can be considerably cleaned up when used as a trigger for an li6 or any variant of hydrogen enhanced which has little to no residual radiation leaving only traces of tritium. Certainly would work well if you wanted to blow something up with little trace of 'who/how dun it' 1 gram gamma ray triggered would mean golf ball sized nukes have been here for quite some time. |
|
|
|
Fact is we dont and cant know where they are at on the nuke scene. The A bomb was fiction until they leveled Hiroshima with it. The suprprize look what we have. The madm's and sadm's are ancient technology by todays standards. One gram of fully charged hafnium isomer could store more energy than 50 kilograms of TNT. Miniature missiles could be made with warheads that are far more powerful than existing conventional weapons, giving massively enhanced firepower to the armed forces using them.
The effect of a nuclear-isomer explosion would be to release high-energy gamma rays capable of killing any living thing in the immediate area. It would cause little fallout compared to a fission explosion, but any undetonated isomer would be dispersed as small radioactive particles, making it a somewhat “dirty” bomb. This material could cause long-term health problems for anybody who breathed it in. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4049-gamma-ray-weapons-could-trigger-next-arms-race/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafnium and 178m2Hf is a particularly attractive candidate for induced gamma emission (IGE) experiments, because of its high density of stored energy, 2.5 MeV per nucleus, and long 31-year half life for storing that energy. If radiation from some agent could "trigger" a release of that stored energy, the resulting cascade of gamma photons would have the best chance of finding a pair of excited states with the inverted lifetimes needed for stimulated emission. While induced emission adds only power to a radiation field, stimulated emission adds coherence. The possibility to manipulate gamma ray coherence, even to a small degree, would be interesting.[4] The lifetime of the hafnium isomer is long enough for tractable amounts of material to be collected into experimental targets. Such samples would hold no hazards for personnel working with the material; 1 microgram of 178m2Hf has an activity of 1.5 megabecquerels (41 microcuries). A proposal to test the efficacy for "triggering" 178m2Hf was approved by a NATO-Advanced Research Workshop (NATO-ARW) held in Predeal in 1995.[5] Although the proposal was to use incident protons to bombard the target, α-particles were available when the first experiment was scheduled. It was done by a French, Russian, Romanian and American team. Results were said [6] to be extraordinary, but the results were not published. Nevertheless, 178m2Hf was implied to be of special importance to potential applications of IGE. A controversy quickly erupted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafnium_controversy Then dont forget any of these fissile devices can be considerably cleaned up when used as a trigger for an li6 or any variant of hydrogen enhanced which has little to no residual radiation leaving only traces of tritium. 1 gram gamma ray triggered would mean golf ball sized nukes have been here for quite some time. i'm sure they have better stuff now... some of their missiles can blow through 20 feet of hardened reinforced concrete, with small nukes as the payload... they tested a lot of these in Iraq, during the war... |
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Wed 05/04/16 08:31 AM
|
|
I agree It would be nice of we could live in a peaceful world bit least be honest that won't happen. If we had more love, respect and , consideration towards others that a good start. It would be better if we put more money into healing people not destroying them. People of peace like it or not are forced to fight people that would impose their will upon them and steal from them by force of pen or any other form of WMD. There is no money in curing people and trillions in putting on bandaids especially if those bandaids create yet more problems. We have a lot to look forward to, all we have to choose from for government are crooks and thugs who became wealthy through being a better crook or thug than the next guy. The futures so brite I gotta wear shades! |
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Wed 05/04/16 08:42 AM
|
|
i'm sure they have better stuff now... some of their missiles can blow through 20 feet of hardened reinforced concrete, with small nukes as the payload... they tested a lot of these in Iraq, during the war... Well they are all worried that someone might get even with us by setting off a dirty bomb. Yet, far from banning DU, America and Britain stepped up their denials of the harm from this radioactive dust as more and more troops from the first Gulf war and from action and peacekeeping in the Balkans and Afghanistan have become seriously ill. This is no coincidence. In 1997, while citing experiments, by others, in which 84 percent of dogs exposed to inhaled uranium died of cancer of the lungs, Dr. Asaf Durakovic, then Professor of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine at Georgetown University in Washington was quoted as saying, 'The [US government's] Veterans Administration asked me to lie about the risks of incorporating depleted uranium in the human body.' He concluded, 'uranium does cause cancer, uranium does cause mutation, and uranium does kill. If we continue with the irresponsible contamination of the biosphere, and denial of the fact that human life is endangered by the deadly isotope uranium, then we are doing disservice to ourselves, disservice to the truth, disservice to God and to all generations who follow.' Not what the authorities wanted to hear and his research was suddenly blocked. http://www.rense.com/general64/du.htm Here is the skinny and why the US and UK is considered by everyone except of course the US and UK to be guilty of war crimes (among other reasons). Its on par with the same inhuman despicable **** they pulled at Dresden, the 'real' holocaust. http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/en/docs/163.pdf They spread this crap all over the region, there was no reason on this planet why they should inflict on any population long if not permanent health problems that are likely to continue for generations if not eternity. Orwell 1984 was supposed to be a novel, not a manual for gvmnt SOP. |
|
|
|
i'm sure they have better stuff now... some of their missiles can blow through 20 feet of hardened reinforced concrete, with small nukes as the payload... they tested a lot of these in Iraq, during the war... Well they are all worried that someone might get even with us by setting off a dirty bomb. Yet, far from banning DU, America and Britain stepped up their denials of the harm from this radioactive dust as more and more troops from the first Gulf war and from action and peacekeeping in the Balkans and Afghanistan have become seriously ill. This is no coincidence. In 1997, while citing experiments, by others, in which 84 percent of dogs exposed to inhaled uranium died of cancer of the lungs, Dr. Asaf Durakovic, then Professor of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine at Georgetown University in Washington was quoted as saying, 'The [US government's] Veterans Administration asked me to lie about the risks of incorporating depleted uranium in the human body.' He concluded, 'uranium does cause cancer, uranium does cause mutation, and uranium does kill. If we continue with the irresponsible contamination of the biosphere, and denial of the fact that human life is endangered by the deadly isotope uranium, then we are doing disservice to ourselves, disservice to the truth, disservice to God and to all generations who follow.' Not what the authorities wanted to hear and his research was suddenly blocked. http://www.rense.com/general64/du.htm Here is the skinny and why the US and UK is considered by everyone except of course the US and UK to be guilty of war crimes (among other reasons). Its on par with the same inhuman despicable **** they pulled at Dresden, the 'real' holocaust. http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/en/docs/163.pdf They spread this crap all over the region, there was no reason on this planet why they should inflict on any population long if not permanent health problems that are likely to continue for generations if not eternity. Orwell 1984 was supposed to be a novel, not a manual for gvmnt SOP. thx for sharing! Absolutely tragic for the population of Iraq, Afghanistan and now Syria, not to mention the people who served there |
|
|
|
i'm sure they have better stuff now... some of their missiles can blow through 20 feet of hardened reinforced concrete, with small nukes as the payload... they tested a lot of these in Iraq, during the war... Well they are all worried that someone might get even with us by setting off a dirty bomb. Yet, far from banning DU, America and Britain stepped up their denials of the harm from this radioactive dust as more and more troops from the first Gulf war and from action and peacekeeping in the Balkans and Afghanistan have become seriously ill. This is no coincidence. In 1997, while citing experiments, by others, in which 84 percent of dogs exposed to inhaled uranium died of cancer of the lungs, Dr. Asaf Durakovic, then Professor of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine at Georgetown University in Washington was quoted as saying, 'The [US government's] Veterans Administration asked me to lie about the risks of incorporating depleted uranium in the human body.' He concluded, 'uranium does cause cancer, uranium does cause mutation, and uranium does kill. If we continue with the irresponsible contamination of the biosphere, and denial of the fact that human life is endangered by the deadly isotope uranium, then we are doing disservice to ourselves, disservice to the truth, disservice to God and to all generations who follow.' Not what the authorities wanted to hear and his research was suddenly blocked. http://www.rense.com/general64/du.htm Here is the skinny and why the US and UK is considered by everyone except of course the US and UK to be guilty of war crimes (among other reasons). Its on par with the same inhuman despicable **** they pulled at Dresden, the 'real' holocaust. http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/en/docs/163.pdf They spread this crap all over the region, there was no reason on this planet why they should inflict on any population long if not permanent health problems that are likely to continue for generations if not eternity. Orwell 1984 was supposed to be a novel, not a manual for gvmnt SOP. thx for sharing! Absolutely tragic for the population of Iraq, Afghanistan and now Syria, not to mention the people who served there they're still at it... http://talk.baltimoresun.com/topic/270916-sarin-clinton-did-hillary-approve-sending-libyas-sarin-to-syrian-islamists/ |
|
|
|
Cool video Moe...makes you wonder how small and what kind(neutron, hydrogen)of bombs we have now after 50 years of more research and development. lol... probably will find out soon enough... * Good technology can be useful http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cpd0zQj5C2M ** Umm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAUOv5Xhfyg |
|
|