'COMMENTS ARE NOW CLOSED’: Illegal Alien Convicted of Murder After Stabbing Father of Two to Death, Ripping Out His Liver


Mauricio Morales-Caceres mugshot
Montgomery County State's Attorneys Office

breitbart.com
by Katie McHugh
1 May 2016

Illegal alien Morales-Caceres, 24, started by stabbing Navarro in the back before stabbing him in the face, then his head, and then his chest, according to prosecutors.

Standing before an image of the extremely gruesome murder scene, prosecutor Douglas Wink said Morales-Caceres sawed through his victim’s body to tear out his liver and place it on his chest.

“The defendant took the knife and sawed,” he said. “This man reached in with his bare hands and took out his liver. He probably thought it was his heart. He ripped out his liver and left it on his chest for the police to see.”

The Washington Post buried the fact that Morales-Caceresis is an illegal alien.

Nice of WaPo to share this detail at Paragraphs 37 and 38. Too interesting! @kausmickey https://t.co/ex7dDXMK8i pic.twitter.com/CzRMIPUZHO

— tedfrank (@tedfrank) May 1, 2016

They also shut down the comments section, explaining: “We turn off the comments on stories dealing with personal loss, tragedies or other sensitive topics.”

The murder took place in December 2014.

“Should ­Morales-Caceres ever get out of prison, every indication is that he would be deported to his native El Salvador,” The Washington Post reports in an aside. “Prosecutors earlier said he entered the United States illegally. And since his stay at the Montgomery County jail, immigration officials have lodged a detainer on him, an indication they would move to have him deported at the end of a prison sentence.”

If El Salvador decides they won’t take Morales-Caceres back, should he ever be released, the U.S. would likely turn him loose onto American streets — thanks to the overreaching Supreme Court ruling, Zadvydas v. Davis (2001). As the Center for Immigration Studies writes:

In order to eliminate what it considered the “constitutional threat” of the potentially indefinite detention of deportable aliens, the Court held that “once removal is no longer reasonably foreseeable, continued detention is no longer authorized by statute.” The Court then arbitrarily decided that six months was all that was necessary for determining an alien’s deportability… Put simply, a reviewing court’s definition of “reasonably foreseeable” now determines the release of deportable aliens back onto the streets.

So, should Morales-Caceres be freed from prison before his life sentence concludes and El Salvador refuses to welcome him back, it’s only six months until he’s free to haunt American neighborhoods once more.

One-fifth of the entire population of El Salvador currently resides in America, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/05/01/illegal-alien-stabs-man-to-death-ripping-out-liver/
* Embedded links ...& comments *

Related : Topic: I.C.E. 2015
http://m.mingle2.com/topic/show/479447/

1. El Salvador (or Mexico, Honduras, whoever) sends their crappy citizens here.

2. El Salvador (or Mexico, Honduras, whoever) says they won't take em back.

3. Profit from the fact they now have no more crappy citizens.

no worries,plenty more where they came from!

Given the gravity of the case,
I wonder why he wasn't sentenced
to lethal injection.

Screw what his country of origin wants.
Strap a cargo chute to his back, or a rucksack
full of bricks, and airdrop him on his hometown.

That's two for me. That plan works for me....

I have no problem with a news group turning off comments on a news story. That doesn't prevent Freedom of Speech.

It isn't an attack on FOS, until talking about a subject at all, is criminalized.

* I sorta remember Cuba enjoyed freeing some strange people to the U.S. years ago.
* Cuba / U.S. relations returning to normal, will they now be returned?




*

Decades ago many conservatives were trying to restrict speech and expression, while most liberals argued for freedom of speech.

Today, the situation has reversed.

One reason is because part of the liberal agendas just aren't compatible with the facts, nor with well reasoned arguments.

So true. The science of Propaganda.

seems to show someone else is in control behind the scenes...

I disagree.

I've been watching, and studying this in particular, for a very long time. And I've seen as all kinds of groups of people at various times, got ramped up on striving to get their say.

As soon as someone came up with the idea of calling Freedom of Speech a great thing that proves your society is extra fab, people who wanted to vent about whatever, started pretending to believe in FOS.


Actually, if you look closely and carefully enough, you can see that there really aren't all that many people who actually know what free speech IS.

Most people seem to think it means "I can say whatever makes me feel good about myself, and anyone who complains when I do is a commie swine, anti-freedom no good crud."

Lots of others, think shouting down someone who's saying something they disapprove of, is THEM exercising Free Speech. No difference between left and right on THAT version.

Most of all, what I've come to see is that people keep acting like people. They will SAY, whatever they think will get them what they want. That's why so many people appear to get Freedom of Speech backwards. The only reason they call it FOS, is because it lets them feel self-righteous, not because they actually thought it through. And the reason they don't recognize when they are trampling everyone elses FOS, is because they never really knew what their own was.

You know what the worst thing is? Or at least might be? Especially these days... what most of the people fussing about free speech for themselves or others are spending the most energy on, is working up a reason why they can justify refusing to LISTEN.

That's the down side of this whole anti-political correctness stuff: not that people want to speak out and ignore "the rules," but that they want to shout "that's political correctness, so I'm going to declare any and all of your concerns to be null and void!"

Freedom of thought and speech, should never become a cover story for turning your back on half of reality.

Yeah, well its not like I have citations of some quasi-objective survey/analysis of the media.

I just have my personal impressions, which are this: The hippies of the 60s advocated for free speech, free expression. Religious moralists have advocated for various kinds of censorship over the decades, and it was usually liberals who I saw speaking out against them the most. (Sure there were libertarians and freedom-loving conservatives, but their voices weren't as loud). Today, on the left, we have a culture of SJWs who are consistently opposed to free expression and free speech, and its the conservatives who are speaking out against them.

Yes, too many people assume that "free speech" can only refer to the 1st amendment of the US constitution.

That's one specific bit of text with legal relevance in one region which embodies one set of ideas about "free speech".

But "free speech" in general is more abstract than that; its an idea, value. Its a value that might be held by anyone in any country. Its not even one specific idea, there are different equally valid takes on what "free speech" should encompass, how it should be balanced with other values.

Wow I wouldn't be surprised if this guy is ms13. Those central Americans are phsycos, kinda like Nazis. But nicer.

** Many countries have very detailed Laws, clearly noting "Free- Speech"

** Mr. Trump may have broken Canada's "Free-Speech" Laws.
* Mr. Trump / citizen or President would not be allowed into Canada.
* This is being investigated.
*
** "Google" to learn more about the investigation.

* "A hate crime is a criminal offence committed against a person or property, the motive for which is based in whole or in part upon the victim's race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, gender, disability or sexual orientation"

http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/crime/wd95_11-dt95_11/p2.html