Topic: Fonetic Fun
whispertoascream's photo
Thu 11/01/07 10:56 AM
It has often been pointed out that communication would be simpler if the English were not so unnecessarily difficult; for example, cough, plough, rough, through and through. A gradual program of changes would wipe out the anomalies.

In the first year, 's' would be used instead of the the soft 'c.' sertainly sivil servents in all sities would reseive this news with joy. Then the hard 'c' could be replaced replased by 'k' sinse both letter are pronounsed alike. Not only would this klear up konfusion in the minds of klerikal workers, but keyboards kould be made with one less letter. And the English would look more like German.

There would be growing enthusiasm when, in the sekond year, it was announsed that the troublesome 'ph' would hensforth be written 'f.' This would make words like 'fotograf' twenty persent shorter to print.

In the third year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reash the the stage where more komplikated shanges are possible. Governments would ankourage the removal of double leters. whish has always been deterent to akurate speling.

We would al agre that the horible mes of the silent 'e's in the languag is disgrasful. Therfor we kould drop them and kontinu to read and writ as though nothing has hapend. By this tim it would be four years sins skem began, and peopl would be respectiv to steps. sutsh as replasing 'th' by 'z.' Perhaps zen ze funktion 'w' kould be taken on by 'v,' vitsh is, after al, half a 'w.'

Shortly after zis, ze unesesary 'o' kould be droped from vords kontaining 'ou.' Similar arguments vud of kors be aplid to oxer kombinations of letters.

Kontinuing zis proses yer after yer, ve vud eventuli have a relui sensibl riten styl. After tventi yers zer vud be no mor trubls, difikultis, and evrivun vud find ittu understand etsh ozer.


no photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:04 AM
I never did understand the hooked with phonics way of learning. When I tried to teach my son how to read, I was really surprized that none of the phonics really applied.

The english language is one of the hardest to learn and when you really look at it, its completely insane to expect a child or anyone for that matter to know all the "rules" . Consider the word Bear or Bare......they sound the same but have 2 entirely different meanings...and spelled 2 different waysgrumble grumble

kidatheart70's photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:07 AM
I before E, except after C? How often does this rule really apply. Why fill a childs head full of crap at such an early age. laugh laugh laugh

whispertoascream's photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:12 AM
I know. They have all these rules, THEN they make all these exceptions to these rules. I mean what is the point of a rule if there are exceptions?huh grumble

no photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:13 AM
I think learning Mandarin is easier!!!:wink: laugh laugh laugh

kidatheart70's photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:17 AM
English was the second language I learned. I learned Finnish at home before I went to school. When I went to kindergarden I would escape for the first few weeks because I had no idea what these people were mumbling about. They had to lock the classroom door to kepp me there.
I knew more Spanish fron Sesame Street than I did Engrish!laugh

no photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:18 AM
hahahahaaaaaaaa!!!!

Im imagining kid talking like the Svedish chef off the Muppets!!!laugh laugh laugh laugh

Native_Grl39's photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:19 AM
I think we should just spell words how we pronounce them and end all the confusion!!!!!!!!!

:wink: huh bigsmile

kidatheart70's photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:28 AM
You do in Finnish!drinker

Tervetulloa = Welcome

Paskiainen + Sh!theadlaugh

no photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:30 AM
ohhhhhhhhh I used to know the beginning of the Ikea commercial

say hey la ba vie!!! torkey torkey torkey laugh laugh

anouk's photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:31 AM
servus alle zusammen!!flowerforyou

no photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:33 AM
feliz navidad!:wink:

kidatheart70's photo
Thu 11/01/07 11:35 AM
Oklaugh flowerforyou