Topic: Africa Gave Birth To All Civilizations.!!!
NegusGlennDennis's photo
Sun 01/24/16 11:34 AM
Lmao u guys are funny

Conrad_73's photo
Sun 01/24/16 11:37 AM

Lmao u guys are funny

actually,your Cracked History is even funnier!laugh

yellowrose10's photo
Sun 01/24/16 11:39 AM
Wtf does this have to do with religion?

OP are you Ethiopian royalty?

Conrad_73's photo
Sun 01/24/16 11:45 AM

Wtf does this have to do with religion?

OP are you Ethiopian royalty?
bigsmile

mightymoe's photo
Sun 01/24/16 11:46 AM

Wtf does this have to do with religion?

OP are you Ethiopian royalty?


black panthers like to be called kings and queens and other white royalty status names...

yellowrose10's photo
Sun 01/24/16 11:46 AM


Wtf does this have to do with religion?

OP are you Ethiopian royalty?
bigsmile


blushing

Conrad_73's photo
Sun 01/24/16 11:51 AM


Wtf does this have to do with religion?

OP are you Ethiopian royalty?


black panthers like to be called kings and queens and other white royalty status names...

Haile Selassie of Ethiopia was actually the last Ethiopian Emperor entitled to use that Title!

no photo
Sun 01/24/16 12:55 PM

Who taught the world about math,astrology,sciences,and everything else? Africa.!! Where did everyone go to study? Africa.!! Oh even Plato and the rest of those thieves went to Africa to study but claimed they "somehow" didn't
DO YOUR RESEARCH


Show us YOUR RESEARCH.

Conrad_73's photo
Sun 01/24/16 12:57 PM


Who taught the world about math,astrology,sciences,and everything else? Africa.!! Where did everyone go to study? Africa.!! Oh even Plato and the rest of those thieves went to Africa to study but claimed they "somehow" didn't
DO YOUR RESEARCH


Show us YOUR RESEARCH.

Nuwaubian Science perhaps!laugh

Dodo_David's photo
Sun 01/24/16 12:58 PM

Lmao u guys are funny


Look who's talking. laugh

NegusGlennDennis's photo
Sun 01/24/16 01:21 PM
This article is a contribution to the continuing debate between Western and African scholars regarding the role Africans played in the development of modern civilization. According to Dr. George G. M. James, author of the book, Stolen Legacy," the authors of Greek philosophy were not the Greeks but the people of North Africa, commonly called the Egyptians; and the praise and honor falsely given to the Greeks for centuries belong to the people of North Africa, and therefore to the African continent."

Apparently, the impression given by some Western scholars that the African continent made little or no contributions to civilization, and that its people are naturally primitive has, unfortunately, become the basis of racial prejudice and negative perception directed against all people of African origin.

This article, therefore, is an overview of Africa's contributions to Western Civilization. As such, it will briefly trace the history of Africa beginning with the empire of ancient Egypt and continues on to other African empires that developed thereafter. It will also review some aspect of African Civilization and the impact it had on the development of Western Civilization.

ANCIENT EGYPTIAN EMPIRES

The contributions made by Egyptians toward the development of what we consider modern civilization cannot be overemphasized. Between the periods of 3000 B. C and 1100 B. C, a long line of kings known as pharaohs governed Egypt. Under the pharaohs were the ruling of the royal court, governors of the provinces in which the kingdom was divided, and commanders of the army, etc. Priests and priestesses officiated at religious ceremonies and attended to the needs of their gods, but also served under the pharaohs.

The Greeks brought Egyptian education and influences to the Western world. One of the Greeks who enunciated the cultural, religious, and philosophical teachings of the Egyptians was Pythagorus. He was one of the men who introduced the teachings of the Egyptians to the Europeans. As such, the knowledge he passed on to his followers were those he attained from the Egyptians. The teachings of Pythagorus came to us from three main sources. First, from the writings of one of his followers by the name of Nicomachus. In the introduction his book, “Introduction To Arithmetic,” Pythagorus’ theory was illustrated in a form closest to the original teachings by the Pythagorean brotherhood. Second, Pythagorean ideas can be found in the works of the great thinkers like Plato who was influence by followers of Pythagorus. Finally, some understanding of Pythagorus' theory may be attained form other famous writers like Aristotle.

The Egyptians developed the concept of the right angle, which is the basis of the Pythagorean theorem. This concept is one of the fundamental teachings of the Egyptian mystery school. It is reflected in the designs of the ancient Egyptian pyramids, which were initiated centuries before the birth of Pythagorus. This concept and others like it, however, were "introduced" by Pythagorus. They represent the understanding of man and the order of nature. According to the Pythagorean brotherhood, the study of the Number Theory which is the foundation of creation -- is an aid to achieving harmony between the soul and that which one meditates. In his book, THE UNIVERSE OF NUMBERS, Ralph M. Lewis states, "The influence of the Pythagorean brotherhood extended over a long period of time. The followers of Pythagorus influenced Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. Thinkers such as Fluid, Vaughn, and Hoyden based their philosophy, to some extend, on Pythagorean ideas, including scientists such as Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and Newton." Chikn Anta Diop, a Senegalese historian has argued that Pythagorean theory, the concept of Pi, Geometric formulas and the screw and level are only some of the patrimonies of ancient Egypt and not of Greece as conventional wisdom holds.

In the September 23, 1991, edition of Newsweek, page 49, Bernal, the author of the 575 page book, BLACK ATHENA, published in 1987, explores the reason why in the beginning of the 18th century European scholars intentionally omitted the names of Egypt and Canaan from the family tree of Western Civilization. Bernal's conclusion was that the classicists were racists and anti-Semites. They could not stand the idea that their beloved Greece had been made "impure" by African and Semitic influences. Therefore, they dismissed as mere coincidence, how Egyptian and Canaanite technologies, philosophies and political theories shaped Algean Civilization. Additionally, Bernal is convinced that many pharaohs were black. Among them was Menthotpe who reunited Egypt around 21 B. C after 300 years of chaos.

Egyptians also initiated the concept of monotheism-the belief in one God. Akhennaten, king of Egypt and God of the sun was the pharaoh who introduced monotheism to his people. He was also a poet, artistic, an innovator, visionary, instigator of monotheism and forerunner of Christ. He ruled Egypt during the 14th century BC. The personality of Akhennaten continues to fascinate students of Egyptology. He was the husband of Nefertiti, a goddess of her time. Historians perceived Akhennaten as a good ruler who loved mankind. Some of his religious practices and ideas have influenced fraternities in the Western world.

KINGDOMS OF AFRICA SOUTH OF THE SAHARA DESERT

The empires of Ghana, Mali, and Songhai were powerful medieval states in West Africa. Each empire was advanced in matters regarding the administration of government and economic prosperity. During each era of their respective histories, they were powerful nations, which had vital trading links with the commercial world of North Africa and Europe.

GHANA

Ghana was the first of the three empires to rise as a regional power in West Africa. The history of Ghana is based largely on the writings of Arab travelers who visited and traded with its people. Before the Roman Empire left North Africa in the 4th century AD, Ghana was already a powerful nation. Various countries in Europe were dependent on imports of gold before the discovery of America. The "civilization" of Ghana was advanced to such a level that a system of taxation was imposed on every load of goods entering or leaving the empire. Trading, therefore, was a highly organized system which the wealth and importance of Ghana was based.

According to El-farzari, an Arab writer of that period, the people of Ghana were also successful in overpowering their advanced methods of warfare and their weapons, which were swords and lances.

MALI

The Empire of Mali emerged when Ghana's powers declined. In the 13th century, the Mandingo speaking people began to extend their kingdom and pushed towards the South and southeast regions of West Africa. Ghana's military forces were eventually defeated. When Sundaiata Kita became ruler of Mali, it became the most powerful of all the kingdoms of the Sudan. The gold trades continue to flourish under his reign. After Sundiata, his grandson, Mansa Musa, became ruler. During his reign, Mali became known throughout the Mediterranean world and in Europe.

SONGHAI

During the decline of Mali, the Songhai Empire emerged. In about 1464, Soni Ali became king of Songhai. He was an ambitious young man who led his army to capture Timbuktu, a city known for its learning centers and trade routes, in 1468. Thereafter, he also captured Jenne, another famous city like Timbuktu. After Soni Ali's death, one of his generals removed his son from the throne and took control of the empire by force. He, thereafter, named himself Mohammed. Mohammed was very organized and instituted a system of discipline government. He created a number of central offices, similar to our contemporary government departments to oversee justice, finance, agriculture and other matters of importance in the affairs of the state. Under his rule, trade in gold from Sudan region continued to flow northward into Europe.

Asking Mohammed imported manufactured goods, clothes, and salt from Spain and Germany. It was also during his reign that Timbuktu became a greater center of learning. Its university, one the first in Africa, was so famous that scholars came to it from all over the Muslim world, Europe and Asia. As a Muslim himself, Asking allowed Islamic influence to spread throughout the Sudan.

Why did these African empires collapse? Some scholars cited the difficulties of defending the empire in the open West African region, in addition to the corruption influence of the slave trade. While W. E. B. Du Bois stated that Sudanese civilization fell before the triphammer blows of two of the world's great religions, Islam and Christianity. Another reason also advanced by Es-Sadi, a Timbuktu intellectual who wrote a history of the Sudan, TARKH AL-SUDAN, for the fall of the Songhai Empire was that the people had grown fat and soft on luxury and good living. He said that, "At that moment, faith was exchanged go infidelity; there was nothing forbidden by God which was not openly done … because of these abominations, the almighty in his vengeance drew upon the Songhai the victorious army of the Moors."

CONCLUSION

From the history of four of Africa's great empires, it can be clearly seen that Africa and Africans have contributed to what we now consider Western Civilization). All along the West African coast, Africans had developed various systems of government, from the extended family to regional empires and the Village State. Many of them consisting of those attributes of a modern state (i.e., armies, courts, etc.). According to Melville J. Herskovits, a known anthropologist, "of the areas inhabited by non-literate people, Africa exhibits the great incidence of complex governmental structures. Not even the kingdom of Peru and Mexico could mobilize resources and concentrate power more effectively than could some of these African monarchies, which are more to be compared with Europe of the middle ages then referred to the common conception of the 'primitive' state."

From the mystery schools of Egypt to the University of Sankore and other intellectual centers in Timbuktu and Jenne, scholars throughout the Western world came to Africa in search of knowledge and wisdom. Leo Africanus, a Christianized moor, informed us that at the time, "In Timbuktu there are numerous judges, doctors, clerics, all receiving good salaries from the king. He pays great respect to men of learning. There is a big import from Barbary. More profit is made from the book trade than from any other line of business." The learning centers in Timbuktu had large and valuable collections of manuscripts in several languages, including Greek and Latin.

Africans are also a deeply religious and artistic people. To most Africans, religion and art are the foundations of life. Religion and art are a collective expression in which all the people participate.

As I mentioned earlier, Africa's contribution to Western Civilization cannot be overemphasized. As early as in 1907, the great European artist, Picasso, changed the faces of his Canvas, LES DEMOISELLES D 'AVIGNON, to look like African masks. This marked a turning point in western art.

I hope that information contained in this article will inspire others to explore the rich study of African history; especially African and African American youths that may want to know more about their heritage. Wise men throughout the ages have told us that, ''To understand and appreciate our history is to understand ourselves. In understanding ourselves, we gradually open the window to our ingenuity and inner creativeness.''

NegusGlennDennis's photo
Sun 01/24/16 01:31 PM
Africa is a continent of great size, almost 12 million square miles or
about three times the size of the United States. Most of it lies in the
tropics and, although we often think of Africa in terms of its rain forests,
less than ten percent of the continent is covered by tropical forests, and
those are mostly in West Africa. Much of the African surface is covered by
savannas, or open grasslands, and by arid plains and deserts. In geological
terms, the continent is really formed by a series of high plateaus broken in
the east by the Great Rift valley and the mountains that surround it. Large
rivers - the Congo, the Nile, the Zambezi, and the Niger - begin in the
interior of the continent and flow to the sea over great falls and cataracts
that mark the passage from the plateau to the coast. These falls have
historically made movement from the coast to the interior difficult, but the
great river systems have also provided the interior of Africa with routes of
communication.

We have already noted the origins of humankind in East Africa where some
of the earliest fossil remains of protohominids have been found. Even before
the appearance about 300,000 years ago of Homo sapiens, the ancestors of
modern human beings, other hominid species, such as Homo erectus, had moved
outward from Africa to Asia and Europe. Africa, therefore, holds a special
place in the development of the human species. It was the scene of human
origins. Moreover, in cultural terms, Africa participated in the early
development of civilization.

Despite the false image of Africa as the "dark" and isolated continent,
it was, in fact, often in contact with other areas of the world. It received
from them technology, crops, ideas, and material goods that in turn stimulated
social and cultural innovations. Moreover, the contacts were not always in the
same direction, and there is now considerable evidence that not only early
humans but also certain languages, crops, political, and cultural influences
spread outward from Africa.

It is useful to begin this discussion by noting the climatic change that
altered the appearance of the African continent and seems to have set a whole
series of historical processes in motion. That change centers on the area of
the Sahara, which during the Late Stone Age appears to have been far better
watered than it is today, receiving between 10 and 50 times as much rain as at
present. Archeological evidence indicates that a number of peoples, such as
the ancestors of the modern-day Berbers and Tuaregs of North Africa, who speak
languages related to ancient Egyptian, and the ancestors of the Negro peoples
of sub-Saharan Africa, some of whom also spoke these Afro-Asiatic languages
and others who did not, inhabited the area of the Sahara during this period.
Around 9000 years ago this situation began to change as temperatures rose and
rainfall became erratic. By about 3000 B.C., much of the area was desert. The
droughts that have recently affected Africa indicate that the desiccation, or
drying up, of the Sahara is continuing and the desert is growing.

As the Sahara became less habitable, the populations moved north toward
the Mediterranean coast and south into the area of the dry sahel, or fringe,
and, especially, onto the grassy savannas suitable for agriculture and
grazing. Savannas stretch across Africa from the mouth of the Senegal River on
the west coast to Lake Chad and the Upper Nile valley. This broad region, the
Sudan, became a center of cultural development. The movement of peoples into
the Sudan and toward the Nile valley and the Mediterranean set the stage for
major developments in the subsequent history of Africa.

Agriculture, Iron, And The Bantu Peoples

Agriculture may have developed independently in Africa, but many scholars
believe that the spread of agriculture and iron throughout Africa linked that
continent to the major centers of civilization in the Near East and
Mediterranean world. The drying up of the Sahara had pushed many peoples to
the south into sub-Saharan Africa. These were the ancestors of the Negro
peoples. They settled at first in scattered hunting-and-gathering bands,
although in some places near lakes and rivers people who fished, with a more
secure food supply, lived in larger population concentrations. Agriculture
seems to have reached these people from the Near East, since the first
domesticated crops were millets and sorghums whose origins are not African but
West Asian. The route of agricultural distribution may have gone through Egypt
or Ethiopia, which long had contacts across the Red Sea with the Arabian
peninsula. There is evidence of agriculture prior to 3000 B.C.

Once the idea of planting diffused, Africans began to develop their own
crops, such as certain varieties of rice, and they demonstrated a continued
receptiveness to new imports. The proposed areas of the domestication of
African crops lie in a band that extends from Ethiopia across the southern
Sudan to West Africa. Subsequently, other crops, such as bananas, were
introduced from Southeast Asia, and in the 16th century A.D. American crops,
such as maize and manioc, spread widely throughout Africa.

Livestock also came from outside Africa. Cattle were introduced from
Asia, as probably were domestic sheep and goats. Horses were apparently
introduced to Africa from West Asia by the Hyksos invaders of Egypt (1780-1560
B.C.) and then spread across the Sudan to West Africa. Rock paintings in the
Sahara indicate that horses and chariots were used to traverse the desert and
that by 300-200 B.C. there were trade routes across the Sahara. Horses were
adopted by peoples of the West African savanna, and later their powerful
cavalry forces allowed a number of them to carve out large empires. Finally,
the camel was introduced from Asia around the first century A.D. This was an
important innovation, because the camel's ability to thrive in harsh desert
conditions and to carry large loads cheaply made it an effective and efficient
means of transportation. The camel transformed the desert from a barrier into
a still difficult, but more accessible, route of trade and communication.

Livestock provided a living to peoples in the arid portions of the
savanna belt and the Sahara, and permitted a nomadic or seasonally moving, or
transhumant, way of life to flourish in certain inhospitable regions. In some
areas, it appears that livestock and agriculture arrived about the same time.
The spread of cattle was seriously limited in some places by the tsetse fly,
which carries a disease (sleeping sickness) dangerous to humans and especially
cattle. The tsetse flourished in wet lowlands below 3500 feet, and it severely
limited pastoralism and also the use of animals for farming and transport as a
way of life in large areas of West and central Africa.

Iron also came from West Asia, although its routes of diffusion were
somewhat different than those of agriculture. Most of Africa presents a
curious case in which societies moved directly from a technology of stone to
iron without passing through the intermediate stage of copper or bronze
metallurgy, although some early copper-working sites have been found in West
Africa. Iron had been worked in the Near East and Anatolia for at least a
thousand years before it began to penetrate into sub-Saharan Africa. The
Phoenicians carried the knowledge of iron smelting to their colonies, such as
Carthage in North Africa, and from there to their trading ports along the
coast of Morocco. By sea down the coast or by land across the Sahara, this
knowledge penetrated into the forests and savannas of West Africa during the
thousand years before Christ, or at roughly the same time that iron making was
reaching western Europe. Evidence of iron making has been found in Nigeria,
Ghana, and Mali, and iron implements seem to have slowly replaced stone ones
at a number of sites.

This technological shift could cause profound changes in the complexity
of African societies. Iron represented power. In West Africa the blacksmith
who made tools and weapons had an important place in society, often with
special religious powers and functions. Iron hoes, which made the land more
productive, and iron weapons, which made the warrior more powerful, had
symbolic meaning in a number of West African societies. Those who knew the
secrets of iron making gained ritual and sometimes political power.

Iron entered Africa by other routes as well. Iron making seems to have
traveled from the Red Sea into Ethiopia and East Africa and down the Nile from
Egypt into the Sudan where, as we have seen, large African states, such as
Meroe, were in close contact with dynastic Egypt. Meroe's contact with peoples
to the south led to the further diffusion of iron technology. By the first
century A.D., iron was known in sub-Saharan Africa, and within about a
thousand years it had reached the southern end of the continent. Iron tools
and weapons increased efficiencies in agriculture and war. In the later stages
of this story, the adoption of agriculture and the use of iron tools and
weapons were roughly simultaneous processes.

Unlike in the Americas, where metallurgy was a very late and limited
development, Africans had iron from a relatively early date, developing
ingenious furnaces to produce the high heat (1100 f) needed for production and
to control the amount of air that reached the carbon and iron ore necessary
for making iron. Except for those regions directly influenced by the great
Bronze Age civilization of Pharonic Egypt, much of Africa skipped right into
the Iron Age, taking the basic technology and adapting it to local conditions
and resources. The working of bronze was also known to Africans and by A.D.
1000 remarkably lifelike bronze sculptures of great technical virtuosity were
cast at the city-state of Ife in Nigeria by the Yoruba people.

The Bantu Dispersal

The diffusion of agriculture and later of iron was accompanied by a great
movement of people who may have carried these innovations. These people
probably originated in eastern Nigeria in West Africa. Their migration may
have been set in motion by an increase in population caused by a movement into
their homelands of peoples fleeing the desiccation of the Sahara. They spoke a
language, proto-Bantu (bantu means "the people"), which is the parent tongue
of a large number of related Bantu languages still spoken throughout
sub-Saharan Africa. In fact, about 90 percent of the languages south of a line
from the Bight of Benin on the west coast to Somalia on the east coast are
part of the Bantu family.

Why and how these people spread out into central and southern Africa
remains a mystery, but archeologists believe that at some stages their iron
weapons allowed them to conquer their hunting-and-gathering opponents, who
still used stone implements. Still, the process is uncertain, and peaceful
migration - or simply rapid demographic growth - may have also caused the
Bantu expansion.

The migrations moved first to the central Sudan and then into the forests
of West and central Africa. The rivers, and especially the Congo basin,
provided the means of movement; the migration was a long, gradual, and
intermittent process. Moving outward from central Africa, Bantu peoples
arrived at the east coast, where they contacted cattle-raising peoples of a
different linguistic tradition. By the 12th century, the Bantu speakers, the
ancestors of the Shona and Nguni peoples, pushed south of the Zambezi River
into modern Zimbabwe and eventually into South Africa.

From the study of the related Bantu languages, it is possible to learn
something about the original culture of the proto-Bantu speakers. The early
Bantu depended on agriculture and fishing. They raised goats and perhaps
cattle. They were village dwellers who organized their societies around
kinship ties. Leadership of the villages was probably in the hands of a
council of elders. The spirits of the natural world played a large role in the
lives of these people. They looked to their ancestors to help deal with those
spirits, and depended on village religious specialists to deal with calamity
and to combat witchcraft, which they greatly feared.

In about a thousand years the Bantu-speaking peoples expanded over much
of the continent, spreading their languages and cultures among the existing
populations, absorbing those original peoples and being absorbed by them. By
the 13th century A.D., cattle-raising, iron-using Bantu peoples had reached
the southern end of the continent. By that time, Black Africa's major features
were in place. A few pure hunting peoples remained, such as the Pygmies of
central Africa, but their way of life was not that of most Africans.
Agricultural and herding societies with knowledge of iron metallurgy could be
found throughout sub-Saharan Africa. While pockets of peoples still speaking
non-Bantu languages existed, such as the Khoi-Khoi and Bushmen of southern
Africa, and in East Africa the influence of Ethiopian culture was still
strong, Bantu languages predominated all over southern and central Africa and
marked the trail of one of the world's great migrations.

NegusGlennDennis's photo
Sun 01/24/16 01:33 PM
You wanted research now read.!!

mightymoe's photo
Sun 01/24/16 01:33 PM
Sumeria: Sumer (/ˈsuːmər/)[note 1] was one of the ancient civilizations and historical regions in southern Mesopotamia, modern-day southern Iraq, during the Chalcolithic and the Early Bronze ages. Although the earliest specimens of writing in the region do not go back much further than c. 2500 BC, modern historians have suggested that Sumer was first permanently settled between c. 5500 and 4000 BC by a non-Semitic people who spoke the Sumerian language (pointing to the names of cities, rivers, basic occupations, etc., as evidence).[1][2][3][4]

These conjectured, prehistoric people are now called "proto-Euphrateans" or "Ubaidians",[5] and are theorized to have evolved from the Samarra culture of northern Mesopotamia (Assyria).[6][7][8][9] The Ubaidians (though never mentioned by the Sumerians themselves) are assumed by modern-day scholars to have been the first civilizing force in Sumer, draining the marshes for agriculture, developing trade, and establishing industries, including weaving, leatherwork, metalwork, masonry, and pottery

Babylonia: Babylon was an ancient Akkadian-speaking Semitic state and cultural region based in central-southern Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq). A small Amorite-ruled state emerged in 1894 BC, which contained at this time the minor city of Babylon. Babylon greatly expanded during the reign of Hammurabi in the first half of the 18th century BC, becoming a major capital city. During the reign of Hammurabi and afterwards, Babylonia was called Mât Akkadî "the country of Akkad" in Akkadian.[1][2]

It was often involved in rivalry with its older fellow Akkadian state of Assyria in northern Mesopotamia. Babylonia briefly became the major power in the region after Hammurabi (fl. c. 1792 – 1752 BC middle chronology, or c. 1696 – 1654 BC, short chronology) created a short-lived empire, succeeding the earlier Akkadian Empire, Neo-Sumerian Empire, and Old Assyrian Empire; however, the Babylonian empire rapidly fell apart after the death of Hammurabi. The Akkadian Empire fell to the Babylonian Empire later on.

The Babylonian state retained the written Semitic Akkadian language for official use (the language of its native populace), despite its Amorite founders and Kassite successors not being native Akkadians, and speaking a Northwest Semitic Canaanite language and an unclassified language isolate. It retained the Sumerian language for religious use (as did Assyria), but by the time Babylon was founded this was no longer a spoken language, having been wholly subsumed by Akkadian. The earlier Akkadian and Sumerian traditions played a major role in Babylonian (and Assyrian) culture, and the region would remain an important cultural center, even under protracted periods of outside rule.

The earliest mention of the city of Babylon can be found in a tablet from the reign of Sargon of Akkad (2334–2279 BC), dating back to the 23rd century BC. Babylon was merely a religious and cultural centre at this point and neither an independent state nor a large city; like the rest of Mesopotamia, it was subject to the Akkadian Empire which united all the Akkadian and Sumerian speakers under one rule. After the collapse of the Akkadian empire, the south Mesopotamian region was dominated by the Gutians for a few decades before the rise of the Neo-Sumerian Empire (third dynasty of Ur), which, apart from northern Assyria, encompassed the whole of Mesopotamia, including the city of Babylon.

both predates anything in Africa..

NegusGlennDennis's photo
Sun 01/24/16 01:37 PM
Time Line: Complete Hominid Time Line found only in Africa. Chad 7 million years ago Ethiopia 5 million years ago South Africa 3.5 - 4 million years ago
. Oldest Stone Tools: dated back to 2.5 million years ago in Ethiopia and other parts of the Rift Valley
Domestic Use of Fire: 1.4 million years ago.
Oldest Fossils of Modern Man (Homosapiens, Sapiens) 195,000 years ago in Ethiopia
Oldest Example of Fishing - 110,000 years ago, N. E. Africa & South Africa
Oldest Use of Pigments, 150,000 years ago, Rift Valley & South Africa
Oldest Bone Tools, 90,000 years ago in South Africa
Oldest Barbed Points & Hook, 70-90,000 years ago, N.E. & South Africa
Oldest Jewelry Beads, 90,000 years ago, Central & South Africa
Oldest Homesite, 90,000 years ago, Sudan
Stargazing, 43,000 years ago, Nile Valley
Iron Ore Mining, 40,000 years ago
Oldest Known Mathematical Artifact, 37,000 years ago, Lebombo Bone, Swaziland
Oldest Example of Math Calculations, 27,000 years ago, Ishango Bone, Zaire
Oldest Rock Art (Apollo II Rock Shelter) Namibia, 28,000 years ago

Animal Domestication, 15,000 years ago, Ethiopia


Crop Cultivation, 18,000 years ago

NegusGlennDennis's photo
Sun 01/24/16 01:39 PM
Africa provides a comprehensive and contigious time line of human development going back at least 7 million years. Africa, which developed the world's oldest human civilization, gave humanity the use of fire a million and half to two million years ago. It is the home of the first tools, astronomy, jewelry, fishing, mathematics, crops, art, use of pigments, cutting and other pointed instruments and animal domestication. In short Africa gave the world human civilization.

Worlds first abacus found in African
Ishango Bone
World's First Abacus
Millions of years ago human life started in Africa, Australopithecus aphaeresis and Australopithecus africanus and Australopithecus robustus were all key rungs in the development of humanity. These fossils were found in East and South Africa (Azania). Some of the fossils may be as old as 5 million years. For example Australopithecus robustus fossils found in an East Turkana Kenya site were at least 4 million year old.

It is generally accepted that the Homo habilis were the first full fledge tool makingancestor of humans. The earliest archaeological evidence of toolmaking comes from the Koobi Fora section of East Turkana. These Homo habilis are believed to be at least 2.5 million years old. The name Homo habilis comes from the Leakeys. They found what they believed to be conclusive fossil evidence of the first humans in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania and gave these ancestors that name called Homo habilis.. The Olduvai Gorge Homo habilis existed at least a million and quarter years ago

More important than tool making in human evolution is the mastery of fire. Nearly 2 million years ago early East Africans had mastered the use of fire. This was a revolutionary step in the development of humanity. This critical innovation insured the survival and spread of the species around the planet. It gave us an advantage over animal predators such as the big cats, hyenas and allowed human settlements in less accommodating climates. These people have been named Homo erectus by archaeologists. It is generally accepted that the final leap from Homo erectus to Homo sapiens sapiens as having occurred in Africa over two hundreds thousand years ago.

The Encyclopedia of World History describes the use of mtDNA found in fossils as a means of revealing the processes involved in this final leap. (The acronym mtDNA stands for mitochondrial DNA*.)

Molecular biologists like Alan Wilson and Rebecca Cann have studied the human family tree using this form of DNA, which is inherited through the female line without being diluted with paternal DNA. Thus, they argue, it provides a unique tool for studying ancestral populations. They compared mtDNA from Africans, Asians, Europeans, and Southeast Asians and found that the differences between them were small. They formed two groups: one was the Africans, the other the remainder. Wilson and Cann concluded that all modern humans derive from a primordial African population, from which populations migrated to the rest of the Old World with little or no interbreeding with existing archaic human groups. By calculating the rate of mtDNA mutations, they argue that archaic Homo sapiens evolved from Homo erectus in Africa by about 200,000 years ago. Then Homo sapiens sapiens, anatomically modern humans, appeared some 140,000 years ago. Mitochondrial DNA is still controversial, but there is some archaeological evidence from Africa that supports the biologists' scenario. Highly varied, early Homo sapiens populations flourished in sub-Saharan Africa between 200,000 and 150,000 years ago, some of them displaying some anatomically modern features. At the Klasies River Caves on the Indian Ocean coast of South Africa, anatomically modern human remains date to between 125,000 and 95,000 years ago. They are associated with sophisticated, versatile tool kits that were, if anything, superior to those used by the Neanderthals in Europe at the time.

Many scientists believe that Homo sapiens sapiens, modern humans, did indeed evolve in tropical Africa sometime after 150,000 years ago, as the geneticists argue. Ecologist Robert Foley has theorized that modern humans evolved in a mosaic of constantly changing tropical environments, which tended to isolate evolving human populations for considerable periods of time. Some groups living in exceptionally rich areas may have developed unusual hunting and foraging skills, using a new technology so effective that they could prey on animals from a distance with finely made projectiles. With efficient technology, more planning, and better organization of both hunting and foraging, our ancestors could have reduced the risks of living in unpredictable environments in dramatic ways.



source: http://www.bartleby.com/67/24.html



*Mitochondrial is defined as: 1. A spherical or elongated organelle in the cytoplasm of nearly all eukaryotic cells, containing genetic material and many enzymes important for cell metabolism, including those responsible for the conversion of food to usable energy. It consists of two membranes: an outer smooth membrane and an inner membrane arranged to form cristae. 2. The cell organelle where much of cellular respiration takes place; the "power plant" of the cell. Mitochondria probably entered eukaryotes by an act of endosymbiosis, in which one simple cell was absorbed by another. Mitochondria contain their own DNA. It is by tracing the mitochondrial DNA, which individuals inherit only from their mothers, that genetic linkages are often traced (Sources: the Houghton Mifflin Company Medical and Science Dictionaries)

NegusGlennDennis's photo
Sun 01/24/16 01:39 PM
Africa provides a comprehensive and contigious time line of human development going back at least 7 million years. Africa, which developed the world's oldest human civilization, gave humanity the use of fire a million and half to two million years ago. It is the home of the first tools, astronomy, jewelry, fishing, mathematics, crops, art, use of pigments, cutting and other pointed instruments and animal domestication. In short Africa gave the world human civilization.

Worlds first abacus found in African
Ishango Bone
World's First Abacus
Millions of years ago human life started in Africa, Australopithecus aphaeresis and Australopithecus africanus and Australopithecus robustus were all key rungs in the development of humanity. These fossils were found in East and South Africa (Azania). Some of the fossils may be as old as 5 million years. For example Australopithecus robustus fossils found in an East Turkana Kenya site were at least 4 million year old.

It is generally accepted that the Homo habilis were the first full fledge tool makingancestor of humans. The earliest archaeological evidence of toolmaking comes from the Koobi Fora section of East Turkana. These Homo habilis are believed to be at least 2.5 million years old. The name Homo habilis comes from the Leakeys. They found what they believed to be conclusive fossil evidence of the first humans in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania and gave these ancestors that name called Homo habilis.. The Olduvai Gorge Homo habilis existed at least a million and quarter years ago

More important than tool making in human evolution is the mastery of fire. Nearly 2 million years ago early East Africans had mastered the use of fire. This was a revolutionary step in the development of humanity. This critical innovation insured the survival and spread of the species around the planet. It gave us an advantage over animal predators such as the big cats, hyenas and allowed human settlements in less accommodating climates. These people have been named Homo erectus by archaeologists. It is generally accepted that the final leap from Homo erectus to Homo sapiens sapiens as having occurred in Africa over two hundreds thousand years ago.

The Encyclopedia of World History describes the use of mtDNA found in fossils as a means of revealing the processes involved in this final leap. (The acronym mtDNA stands for mitochondrial DNA*.)

Molecular biologists like Alan Wilson and Rebecca Cann have studied the human family tree using this form of DNA, which is inherited through the female line without being diluted with paternal DNA. Thus, they argue, it provides a unique tool for studying ancestral populations. They compared mtDNA from Africans, Asians, Europeans, and Southeast Asians and found that the differences between them were small. They formed two groups: one was the Africans, the other the remainder. Wilson and Cann concluded that all modern humans derive from a primordial African population, from which populations migrated to the rest of the Old World with little or no interbreeding with existing archaic human groups. By calculating the rate of mtDNA mutations, they argue that archaic Homo sapiens evolved from Homo erectus in Africa by about 200,000 years ago. Then Homo sapiens sapiens, anatomically modern humans, appeared some 140,000 years ago. Mitochondrial DNA is still controversial, but there is some archaeological evidence from Africa that supports the biologists' scenario. Highly varied, early Homo sapiens populations flourished in sub-Saharan Africa between 200,000 and 150,000 years ago, some of them displaying some anatomically modern features. At the Klasies River Caves on the Indian Ocean coast of South Africa, anatomically modern human remains date to between 125,000 and 95,000 years ago. They are associated with sophisticated, versatile tool kits that were, if anything, superior to those used by the Neanderthals in Europe at the time.

Many scientists believe that Homo sapiens sapiens, modern humans, did indeed evolve in tropical Africa sometime after 150,000 years ago, as the geneticists argue. Ecologist Robert Foley has theorized that modern humans evolved in a mosaic of constantly changing tropical environments, which tended to isolate evolving human populations for considerable periods of time. Some groups living in exceptionally rich areas may have developed unusual hunting and foraging skills, using a new technology so effective that they could prey on animals from a distance with finely made projectiles. With efficient technology, more planning, and better organization of both hunting and foraging, our ancestors could have reduced the risks of living in unpredictable environments in dramatic ways.



source: http://www.bartleby.com/67/24.html



*Mitochondrial is defined as: 1. A spherical or elongated organelle in the cytoplasm of nearly all eukaryotic cells, containing genetic material and many enzymes important for cell metabolism, including those responsible for the conversion of food to usable energy. It consists of two membranes: an outer smooth membrane and an inner membrane arranged to form cristae. 2. The cell organelle where much of cellular respiration takes place; the "power plant" of the cell. Mitochondria probably entered eukaryotes by an act of endosymbiosis, in which one simple cell was absorbed by another. Mitochondria contain their own DNA. It is by tracing the mitochondrial DNA, which individuals inherit only from their mothers, that genetic linkages are often traced (Sources: the Houghton Mifflin Company Medical and Science Dictionaries)

no photo
Sun 01/24/16 01:40 PM

Africa is a continent of great size, almost 12 million square miles or
about three times the size of the United States. Most of it lies in the
tropics and, although we often think of Africa in terms of its rain forests,
less than ten percent of the continent is covered by tropical forests, and
those are mostly in West Africa. Much of the African surface is covered by
savannas, or open grasslands, and by arid plains and deserts. In geological
terms, the continent is really formed by a series of high plateaus broken in
the east by the Great Rift valley and the mountains that surround it. Large
rivers - the Congo, the Nile, the Zambezi, and the Niger - begin in the
interior of the continent and flow to the sea over great falls and cataracts
that mark the passage from the plateau to the coast. These falls have
historically made movement from the coast to the interior difficult, but the
great river systems have also provided the interior of Africa with routes of
communication.

We have already noted the origins of humankind in East Africa where some
of the earliest fossil remains of protohominids have been found. Even before
the appearance about 300,000 years ago of Homo sapiens, the ancestors of
modern human beings, other hominid species, such as Homo erectus, had moved
outward from Africa to Asia and Europe. Africa, therefore, holds a special
place in the development of the human species. It was the scene of human
origins. Moreover, in cultural terms, Africa participated in the early
development of civilization.

Despite the false image of Africa as the "dark" and isolated continent,
it was, in fact, often in contact with other areas of the world. It received
from them technology, crops, ideas, and material goods that in turn stimulated
social and cultural innovations. Moreover, the contacts were not always in the
same direction, and there is now considerable evidence that not only early
humans but also certain languages, crops, political, and cultural influences
spread outward from Africa.

It is useful to begin this discussion by noting the climatic change that
altered the appearance of the African continent and seems to have set a whole
series of historical processes in motion. That change centers on the area of
the Sahara, which during the Late Stone Age appears to have been far better
watered than it is today, receiving between 10 and 50 times as much rain as at
present. Archeological evidence indicates that a number of peoples, such as
the ancestors of the modern-day Berbers and Tuaregs of North Africa, who speak
languages related to ancient Egyptian, and the ancestors of the Negro peoples
of sub-Saharan Africa, some of whom also spoke these Afro-Asiatic languages
and others who did not, inhabited the area of the Sahara during this period.
Around 9000 years ago this situation began to change as temperatures rose and
rainfall became erratic. By about 3000 B.C., much of the area was desert. The
droughts that have recently affected Africa indicate that the desiccation, or
drying up, of the Sahara is continuing and the desert is growing.

As the Sahara became less habitable, the populations moved north toward
the Mediterranean coast and south into the area of the dry sahel, or fringe,
and, especially, onto the grassy savannas suitable for agriculture and
grazing. Savannas stretch across Africa from the mouth of the Senegal River on
the west coast to Lake Chad and the Upper Nile valley. This broad region, the
Sudan, became a center of cultural development. The movement of peoples into
the Sudan and toward the Nile valley and the Mediterranean set the stage for
major developments in the subsequent history of Africa.

Agriculture, Iron, And The Bantu Peoples

Agriculture may have developed independently in Africa, but many scholars
believe that the spread of agriculture and iron throughout Africa linked that
continent to the major centers of civilization in the Near East and
Mediterranean world. The drying up of the Sahara had pushed many peoples to
the south into sub-Saharan Africa. These were the ancestors of the Negro
peoples. They settled at first in scattered hunting-and-gathering bands,
although in some places near lakes and rivers people who fished, with a more
secure food supply, lived in larger population concentrations. Agriculture
seems to have reached these people from the Near East, since the first
domesticated crops were millets and sorghums whose origins are not African but
West Asian. The route of agricultural distribution may have gone through Egypt
or Ethiopia, which long had contacts across the Red Sea with the Arabian
peninsula. There is evidence of agriculture prior to 3000 B.C.

Once the idea of planting diffused, Africans began to develop their own
crops, such as certain varieties of rice, and they demonstrated a continued
receptiveness to new imports. The proposed areas of the domestication of
African crops lie in a band that extends from Ethiopia across the southern
Sudan to West Africa. Subsequently, other crops, such as bananas, were
introduced from Southeast Asia, and in the 16th century A.D. American crops,
such as maize and manioc, spread widely throughout Africa.

Livestock also came from outside Africa. Cattle were introduced from
Asia, as probably were domestic sheep and goats. Horses were apparently
introduced to Africa from West Asia by the Hyksos invaders of Egypt (1780-1560
B.C.) and then spread across the Sudan to West Africa. Rock paintings in the
Sahara indicate that horses and chariots were used to traverse the desert and
that by 300-200 B.C. there were trade routes across the Sahara. Horses were
adopted by peoples of the West African savanna, and later their powerful
cavalry forces allowed a number of them to carve out large empires. Finally,
the camel was introduced from Asia around the first century A.D. This was an
important innovation, because the camel's ability to thrive in harsh desert
conditions and to carry large loads cheaply made it an effective and efficient
means of transportation. The camel transformed the desert from a barrier into
a still difficult, but more accessible, route of trade and communication.

Livestock provided a living to peoples in the arid portions of the
savanna belt and the Sahara, and permitted a nomadic or seasonally moving, or
transhumant, way of life to flourish in certain inhospitable regions. In some
areas, it appears that livestock and agriculture arrived about the same time.
The spread of cattle was seriously limited in some places by the tsetse fly,
which carries a disease (sleeping sickness) dangerous to humans and especially
cattle. The tsetse flourished in wet lowlands below 3500 feet, and it severely
limited pastoralism and also the use of animals for farming and transport as a
way of life in large areas of West and central Africa.

Iron also came from West Asia, although its routes of diffusion were
somewhat different than those of agriculture. Most of Africa presents a
curious case in which societies moved directly from a technology of stone to
iron without passing through the intermediate stage of copper or bronze
metallurgy, although some early copper-working sites have been found in West
Africa. Iron had been worked in the Near East and Anatolia for at least a
thousand years before it began to penetrate into sub-Saharan Africa. The
Phoenicians carried the knowledge of iron smelting to their colonies, such as
Carthage in North Africa, and from there to their trading ports along the
coast of Morocco. By sea down the coast or by land across the Sahara, this
knowledge penetrated into the forests and savannas of West Africa during the
thousand years before Christ, or at roughly the same time that iron making was
reaching western Europe. Evidence of iron making has been found in Nigeria,
Ghana, and Mali, and iron implements seem to have slowly replaced stone ones
at a number of sites.

This technological shift could cause profound changes in the complexity
of African societies. Iron represented power. In West Africa the blacksmith
who made tools and weapons had an important place in society, often with
special religious powers and functions. Iron hoes, which made the land more
productive, and iron weapons, which made the warrior more powerful, had
symbolic meaning in a number of West African societies. Those who knew the
secrets of iron making gained ritual and sometimes political power.

Iron entered Africa by other routes as well. Iron making seems to have
traveled from the Red Sea into Ethiopia and East Africa and down the Nile from
Egypt into the Sudan where, as we have seen, large African states, such as
Meroe, were in close contact with dynastic Egypt. Meroe's contact with peoples
to the south led to the further diffusion of iron technology. By the first
century A.D., iron was known in sub-Saharan Africa, and within about a
thousand years it had reached the southern end of the continent. Iron tools
and weapons increased efficiencies in agriculture and war. In the later stages
of this story, the adoption of agriculture and the use of iron tools and
weapons were roughly simultaneous processes.

Unlike in the Americas, where metallurgy was a very late and limited
development, Africans had iron from a relatively early date, developing
ingenious furnaces to produce the high heat (1100 f) needed for production and
to control the amount of air that reached the carbon and iron ore necessary
for making iron. Except for those regions directly influenced by the great
Bronze Age civilization of Pharonic Egypt, much of Africa skipped right into
the Iron Age, taking the basic technology and adapting it to local conditions
and resources. The working of bronze was also known to Africans and by A.D.
1000 remarkably lifelike bronze sculptures of great technical virtuosity were
cast at the city-state of Ife in Nigeria by the Yoruba people.

The Bantu Dispersal

The diffusion of agriculture and later of iron was accompanied by a great
movement of people who may have carried these innovations. These people
probably originated in eastern Nigeria in West Africa. Their migration may
have been set in motion by an increase in population caused by a movement into
their homelands of peoples fleeing the desiccation of the Sahara. They spoke a
language, proto-Bantu (bantu means "the people"), which is the parent tongue
of a large number of related Bantu languages still spoken throughout
sub-Saharan Africa. In fact, about 90 percent of the languages south of a line
from the Bight of Benin on the west coast to Somalia on the east coast are
part of the Bantu family.

Why and how these people spread out into central and southern Africa
remains a mystery, but archeologists believe that at some stages their iron
weapons allowed them to conquer their hunting-and-gathering opponents, who
still used stone implements. Still, the process is uncertain, and peaceful
migration - or simply rapid demographic growth - may have also caused the
Bantu expansion.

The migrations moved first to the central Sudan and then into the forests
of West and central Africa. The rivers, and especially the Congo basin,
provided the means of movement; the migration was a long, gradual, and
intermittent process. Moving outward from central Africa, Bantu peoples
arrived at the east coast, where they contacted cattle-raising peoples of a
different linguistic tradition. By the 12th century, the Bantu speakers, the
ancestors of the Shona and Nguni peoples, pushed south of the Zambezi River
into modern Zimbabwe and eventually into South Africa.

From the study of the related Bantu languages, it is possible to learn
something about the original culture of the proto-Bantu speakers. The early
Bantu depended on agriculture and fishing. They raised goats and perhaps
cattle. They were village dwellers who organized their societies around
kinship ties. Leadership of the villages was probably in the hands of a
council of elders. The spirits of the natural world played a large role in the
lives of these people. They looked to their ancestors to help deal with those
spirits, and depended on village religious specialists to deal with calamity
and to combat witchcraft, which they greatly feared.

In about a thousand years the Bantu-speaking peoples expanded over much
of the continent, spreading their languages and cultures among the existing
populations, absorbing those original peoples and being absorbed by them. By
the 13th century A.D., cattle-raising, iron-using Bantu peoples had reached
the southern end of the continent. By that time, Black Africa's major features
were in place. A few pure hunting peoples remained, such as the Pygmies of
central Africa, but their way of life was not that of most Africans.
Agricultural and herding societies with knowledge of iron metallurgy could be
found throughout sub-Saharan Africa. While pockets of peoples still speaking
non-Bantu languages existed, such as the Khoi-Khoi and Bushmen of southern
Africa, and in East Africa the influence of Ethiopian culture was still
strong, Bantu languages predominated all over southern and central Africa and
marked the trail of one of the world's great migrations.


and the source is?

NegusGlennDennis's photo
Sun 01/24/16 01:43 PM
I'm pretty sure that you know how to use google....There's any and everything online where u can look up...History repeats itself but never lies

Dodo_David's photo
Sun 01/24/16 01:46 PM
Ancient Mesopotamia is the cradle of civilization.