The New York Police Department tried to charge a local television news station $36,000 to view bodycam footage, prompting the station to sue the NYPD under the state's Freedom of Information Law (FOIL).

Courtney Gross, a reporter for cable station NY1, sent a FOIL request to the NYPD last April for 190 hours of unedited body-cam footage. The police department responded by saying that it could only provide the station with redacted footage, and even that would cost them $36,000.

Now the network is suing the police department in New York state court, saying that such a price was "excessive" and "effectively bars public access to information that FOIL is intended to guarantee" according to the suit filed in the Manhattan Supreme Court.

"Access to such information should not be thwarted by shrouding it with the cloak of secrecy or confidentiality," NY1 said in the lawsuit.

The NYPD, however, defended the $36,000 charge in a September letter to the network. It argued that the steep price tag was a result of the costs of paying someone to view, edit and process the footage, which would take an estimated 304 hours.

"The lowest paid NYPD employee with the skills required to prepare a redacted copy of the recordings is in the rank of police officer, and the cost of compensating a police officer is $120.00 per hour," the letter said. "Multiplying $120.00 by 304 hours equals $36,480, which closely approximates the amount estimated by the [records access officer]."

It isn't clear where the NYPD took such figures from, since a $120-an-hour wage would add up to a yearly income of about $250,000 a year for a 40-hour workweek - an amount far exceeding the salary of an average NYPD officer.

Gross argued that the purpose of the fee is to throw "a cloak of secrecy" over recorded police activity, and undercuts the purpose of FOIL, which is "to foster transparency and trust between government and the citizenry."

The lawsuit comes at a time when body cameras are becoming more and more common items for officers around the country in an attempt to hold police departments accountable for abuses of authority.


typical liberal lies, telling the public what they wanna hear, then changing the rules... seems people know live are living in a police state, but refuse to do anything about it...

Heck,policing is expensive!
Look at those new Toys they got!

304 hours to edit a video... seems like a lot of waste to edit something that shouldn't be edited in the first place...

I think some of the footage could potentially impede an ongoing investigation.

I don't want the press to release on monday a giant white board diagram detailing the arrest of missouris biggest meth kingpin that's going to happen on wednesday.

I wouldn't want camera footage of my own private property released, arrest or no, seeing as arrest doesn't mean conviction and innocent before proven guilty.

I can see the need to edit the footage to protect ongoing investigations and private property.

Handing over anything that happens on public property, though, no need for editing.

...except for maybe minors.

I don't want video of some 8 year old high on meth that took off her clothes and ran around to be released.

I wouldn't want to have live footage of some guy blowing his brains out on the 5 oclock news with a bunch of kids watching.

I really don't want to see footage of deputy johnson taking a 10 minute dump at dunkin donuts.

true, but it doesn't take a week to do that, only a few hours..

Or, some guy runs by the reporter and farts real loud.

I'll do it for $100/hr

actually, 7 weeks, not a week...

Somebody at nypd is familiar with cya.
Gotta edit the corruption out of the footage.

i have no respect for a city that made "big gulps" illegal... talk about liberal fascism...