According to reports, U.S. pilots in Syria have 'flown over oil tanker convoys 4 lanes wide at times and been told to stay silent'

American officials and responsible western news pundits have had a hard time explaining why the U.S.-led "anti-ISIS" coalition, after more than one year, has been unable to stop ISIS' lucrative oil smuggling operation. Maybe because they were never trying to stop it in the first place? Via New Eastern Outlook:

Reports from pilots and sources up and down the Pentagon chain of command tell an interesting story. Considering America's years of experience at "precision bombing" and the vast intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities of the world's largest military, America's utter failure in curtailing ISIS and her dozens of "sister organizations" has been inexplicable.

American pilots flying over Iraq and Syria have quietly leaked their story for over a year now but no news agency will carry it. They say they have flown over oil tanker convoys 4 lanes wide at times and been told to stay silent.

They report mysterious aircraft dropping supplies to ISIS and al Nusra, they are silenced on that as well.

Hardly surprising. Add in the fact that the Pentagon consistently airdrops ISIS weapons and equipment "by accident", and one begins to question how serious this "anti-ISIS coalition" really is.

If U.S. planes actually targeted ISIS oil convoys, they'd probably get shot down by Turkey.

I thought I saw one of our planes miss the target a few days ago on the news.
They were bombing an Is oil field and the explosion happened way outside that little box you see that's supposedly on the target.

It made me wonder, why show it if it missed, how can they miss these days, and why did it miss?

Maybe I was getting confused or something but there was something in the box, like a refinery or something, and the explosion was way off target.

Strange.

it seems they're half-azzing it all the way around, if not actually protecting ISIS...

It wouldn't surprise me.

Your post made me think of what I saw a few days back.

I had my glasses on while watching the news so it wasn't my eyesight

Maybe the pilot needs an eye test

because it increases global warming...geez people.

lol, they never mention the oil wells on fire in their summits, just what the "public" is causing...

Obonzo doesn't want the dum-I-crats losing campaign contributions from his isis buddies.

There's something amiss in the works.

Maybe, ... just maybe, someday we will learn the truth.

My only question is, if "no one is reporting this," where are you getting the alleged information?

Don't get me wrong, I'm all in favor of finding out when stunts or stupidities are being pulled on us. It's just that we are in a era where PROPAGANDA is more common than factual data. And where a lot of very high paid people are arranging for multiple sources to fake reports, precisely in order to fool us into thinking things are happening when they aren't, or to fool us into thinking nothing is happening when it is.

Do you have any non-conspiratorial websites or sources to support this?

I especially watch out for reporters who report other reporters musings as "anonymous sources." That sort of thing was pulled by people trying to make the Republicans look bad, back when they were in charge of all three branches of government a few years back.

Oh. And since this would only work of ALL of the bombing countries were in on the deal, are you saying that the Russians, British and French are a part of the conspiracy too?

if you click the link, that article actually blames it on a republican, McCain...

It's stopped working, apparently. It takes me to a website called New Eastern Outlook, which has an odd set of articles on it, but not the one you refer to. Perhaps it has been removed.

I can't find anything about who "New Eastern Outlook" is. No indication one way or the other as to their veracity. I am suspicious, since they seem to have a few articles about "chem trails," which are definitely Conspiracy Theory stuff.