100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Rosebub- Obama Is Not Welcomed | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
RebelArcher
on
Sun 10/11/15 07:19 AM
|
|
So to say you have You wanna know what stupid is? Trying to divert Obamas politizing of a tragedy when Obama himself admitted to politizing it....preaching gun control when you dont know one damn thing about firearms in the first damn place....wanting to restrict firearms to law abiding citizens because of the actions of a few....trying to infer the 2nd Amendent is about hunting....calling a magazine a clip...saying a Ferguson shooter did nothing wrong when theres a frickin pic AND video of a firearm in his damn hand...And, changing the subject when your azz has been handed to you multiple times....
a 'God given right' to own a gun is stupid and borders sacrilege. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Sun 10/11/15 07:48 AM
|
|
Which God gave mankind the right to own a gun? I can't find it in my Bible. You must be reading the Quran again. Oooohh...hell no, you did not just say that!  MY previous post...  Nets Hype Muslims Targeted in Chapel Hill Shootings 12 Times More Than Christians in Oregon By Kristine Marsh | October 7, 2015 | 1:02 PM EDT "If African Americans or Muslims had been singled out, President Obama would have gone ballistic, Al Sharpton would be calling for street rallies, and CAIR would be asking for congressional investigations. But because Christians are being cherry picked for murder, there is no call to arms. Indeed, many major media outlets aren't even telling the truth. It's obvious — 'Christian Lives Don't Matter' — either here or abroad.” Nets Hype Muslims Targeted in Chapel Hill Shootings 12 Times More Than Christians in Oregon http://newsbusters.org/blogs/culture/kristine-marsh/2015/10/07/nets-hype-muslims-targeted-chapel-hill-shootings-12-times/ Analysis Breakdown: MRC Culture watched the evening news broadcasts from ABC, NBC, and CBS the three days following each shooting, Feb. 11, 12, 13 and October 2, 3, and 4 respectively, noting each time “Christian,” “Muslim" or "Islam,” and “religion" or "faith” was used. Total time spent by the networks evening news broadcasts covering the Oregon shooting, 38 minutes, 57 seconds : 3 mentions of “Christian;” 11 mentions of “religion” or “faith.” Total time spent by the networks evening news broadcasts covering the Chapel Hill shooting, 15 minutes, 9 seconds: 36 mentions of “Muslim” or “Islam;" 48 mentions of “religion” or “faith.” * I guess we better take those guns off all the white Christians so they don't shoot anybody. 'Humm.. a mass shooting you say .. this might work. They don't want to issue gay marriage licenses or bake gay wedding cakes or vote Democrat anyway' * The good the bad and the ugly full soundtrack:59:3sec http://youtu.be/WjoXaJUOInU/ If you can NOT see that Obama's whole game plan is to take LEGAL guns off those that have them...Veterans, Christians, Jews, Non Democrats, Constitutionalists, Patriots , Business owners, Hunters, Collectors ... Etc. So they can NOT defend themselves against Islam, this adminstration or the UN.. & if they do own a weapon (use it or not) can & will be a arrested or worst , then you are either in denial or just as bad as him & would NOT be welcomes in the town or state of Oregon ... to do crocodile tears & agenda speeches over their dead. devil: Oh yes I did because what somebody else said was ridiculous. The bible doesn't contain the word gun at all. No version New or Old Testament mentions guns cannons rifles or any other firearms. Projectile weapons, the sling that slew goliath, bows, spears, but no guns. So to say you have a 'God given right' to own a gun is stupid and borders sacrilege. Oregon and Chapel Hill have 3 things in common, colleges, guns and murder. In Chapel Hill, three people of a DIFFERENT RELIGION and DIFFERENT RACE were targeted AS SUCH and executed. In Oregon, a CHRISTIAN BIRACIAL shooter asked his victims AS HE REACHED THEM ' "What is your religion?" Because he DIDN'T KNOW. If he HAD TO ASK he COULD NOT HAVE TARGETED THEM for their religion. He is reported by survivors as asking 'who your god is because we will both be meeting him soon.' Someone who is THE SAME RELIGION as their victim CANNOT be targeting them for RELIGIOUS REASONS. One 'victim' he randomly let go "because it's your lucky day" not because you aren't an infidel or idolitor or because 'I don't see your religion as a threat'. Same religion, same race(s), same nationality, Chris Mintz the hero of the day was also a FELLOW VETERAN. The shooter was MENTALLY ILL and SUICIDAL. He wasn't culling Hare Krishnas and releasing Mormons. He saw himself as sending the victims to meet their respective God and or creator. I don't need a map thanks. No Sunshine,it is actually based on the Right to Selfdefense,a Right inherent in every Human Being,so stop making up Stuff! Nowhere else in the Constitution does a 'right' attributed to 'the people' refer to anything other than an individual right. What is more, in all six other provisions of the Constitution that mention 'the people,' the term unambiguously refers to all members of the political community, not an unspecified subset... The Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms... The very text of the Second Amendment implicitly recognizes the pre-existence of the right and declares only that it 'shall not be infringed.' Justice Antonin Scalia (b. 1936) District of Columbia v. Heller, June 26, 2008 The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the "high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and 'is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power. Texas Court Decision Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)] http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2011-fall/ayn-rand-theory-rights/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 10/14/15 01:51 PM
|
|
The Washington Times covered the story in an article titled Armed guards protect Senate Democrats as they demand new gun-control laws, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) said: "The victims and their families deserve better than a Congress that shrugs its shoulders and waits for the next tragedy," reported CNN. It's truly unbelievable Senate Democrats feel the necessity to be protected and surrounded by armed guards, as they try and take guns away from law-abiding citizens.In fact, it's downright shameful.We already know the Oregon shooting took place in a "Gun Free Zone.'" But sadly, the Democratic Senators and their anti-gun crew choose to ignore the facts, and instead use the Oregon massacre as a shameful opportunity to force their gun control agenda down the throats of American gun-owners. http://www.americanpatriotdaily.com/latest/senate-democrats-to-america-on-gun-control-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/ |
|
|
|
|
