Oh the "Hillarious" explanation now being offered on the 'Top Secret' e-mails, is that someone on her staff or from her 'inner circle' took the time to strip all references of Top Secret classifications from the items BEFORE Hildabeast saw them.

So here's what I'm supposed to believe.

1) The State Department puts together an intel package with satellite pics, and with analysis being provided by an analyst of an alphabet agency. The contents are according to the State Department NOT secret, because they are saying she never received ANY Top Secret files from them.
2) The NOT Top Secret package is then sent out to Clinton.
3) The routing of the e-mail magically sends it to someone who removes the 'Top Secret' tabs that supposedly WERE NOT ON THE PACKAGE TO START WITH when the State Department sent it.
4) Even though the package was supposed to go to Clinton, she apparently is not on her own distribution list, because she ONLY gets the 'sanitized' email AFTER the State Department sent it to her!

NOW, if you haven't yet choked on that load of crap, it seems we have an issue with the 'server' Hildabeast 'turned over' to the FBI. They actually picked it up from a company in New Jersey who were storing it. An employee says the server is blank because they actually upgraded the server back in 2013!

Really? That's funny, because in March 2015, Hildabeast said she wiped out the 32,000 missing emails in 2014. So those could have only been deleted from the 'new' or upgraded server, since the old one in storage was 'blanked' the year before.

Based on this information, seems to me the FBI has the wrong server, and Hillary is obstructing justice. I guess she'll need to play the "Oh you mean THAT server?" card. So it will take another year or so for us to get that one, likely AFTER she goes through the 2016 nomination and likely even the election.

IF she became President, and some intrepid investigator finds the Top Secret emails, does she just claim executive privilege and lock them up for 50 years?

Hmmmmm

Hmmm. Well I don't need your respect, but you may need someone to sue your school board if they issued you a diploma. What part of this do I need to break out the crayons for you on?

I watched a State Dept spokesman say THEY never sent Hillary Top Secret files. Ok. An extremely dubious claim, but I'll bite. Evidently if State didn't send it, then someone else did then.

In order for Hillary however to get a 'non secret' file, it has been surmised that one of her staff or personal aides scrubbed all references to any Secret tabs. Ok fine. That can ONLY happen if Hillary is NOT on the distribution list of the e-mail that is being sent to her. Whaaattt? IF she's on the distribution list,(for her own incoming email) then she IMMEDIATELY gets a copy of the 'secret' file. Duhhhh. Sending a scrubbed version later doesn't change the fact that even for a minute, she had Secret files on a server that should not have been there before the clean ones shows up.

In order for her to ONLY receive these sanitized files, she can't be sent the originals. So now HOW does a staffer. apparently of their own volition, scrub such files unless they are either willing to be prosecuted for extremely bad judgement, OR they were directed to scrub files before Hillary got them thus maintaining plausible deniability?

Of course, overshadowing all of this is simply the idea of using some common sense. Hillary knows the difference between run of the mill intel, and the 'spooky' stuff being gathered by No Such Agency, Christians In Action, or the NRO. When she opens up an email and sees hi-res Keyhole satellite pics, and other such materials with code word references, and compartmentalized CC lists, she knows this stuff won't be on a Strafor website, or the NY Times front page tomorrow. She knows its sensitive stuff. If she claims not to have realized its actual level of gravitas, and how she should have dealt with it, then that alone should give you pause in electing her. She's too stupid for the gig.

The math on the server seems pretty simple as well. She says that she turned over the server. She didn't. The FBI did not go to her house, knock on the door and have her hand an agent the server. The FBI went to ANOTHER STATE, TO A BUILDING THAT IS NOT A CLINTON HOME, and removed a server that they were told BY AN EMPLOYEE OF THAT COMPANY was blanked out back in 2013. THAT'S A YEAR BEFORE Hillary says she deleted 32,000 emails. So if a BLANK SERVER is sitting in a warehouse since 2013, what server did she delete e-mail from in 2014??

She can only delete those emails in 2014 IF THEY ARE ON A DIFFERENT SERVER, WHICH THE FBI DOES NOT HAVE IN ITS CUSTODY AT THIS TIME.

SO IF I TALK LOUDER AND SLOWER, DOES THAT HELP YOU NOW???? Blind loyalty will not make these problems go away, and will not change the facts as described. Sorry if it hurts you to have to even for a moment entertain the idea that Hillary may not be all sweetness and light, but suck it up Buttercup. She's continually parsed her sentences that she never sent or received documents that were classified Top Secret at the time she had them.

Here's how that works. At 9:00 her aide gets a Top Secret file. At 9:01 Hillary gets the scrubbed version of the file. At 9:02 she sends the info to someone who maybe should not have it, or makes a copy for herself called 'Brownie Recipe with Nuts'. At 9:03 the aide restores the Top Secret tabs. Now, Hillary can honestly say she never sent or received a Top Secret file in this example right? Since the aide gets the original e-mail, everyone else can honestly say they never sent Hillary a Top Secret file, right?

Legal semantics. Plausible deniability. The allies of politicians everywhere. Even those you may like, and want to vote for.

Since you insist on phrasing this as a series of angry puerile insults, instead of as a functional factual argument, it's impossible to take any of what you say seriously.

I have seen far too many such diatribes posted about all sorts of political targets, and so far, every single time, when the ACTUAL facts come out, the story is at the least more complex, less open and shut.

Come back when you can make a civil, intelligent and cogent argument, and you might garner some useful respect for it.

makes a copy for herself called 'Brownie Recipe with Nuts'.