4 hrs , ago- Washington Times

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/25/l-todd-wood-can-i-see-birth-certificate-again-plea/
---------------------------------------------------------
Maricopa County Sheriff's Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator Mike Zullo announces Tuesday, July 17, 2012, in Phoenix that President Obama's birth certificate, as presented by the White House in April 2011, is a forgery based on an investigation by the Sheriff's office. (AP Photo/Matt York)
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator Mike Zullo announces Tuesday, July 17, 2012, in Phoenix that President Obama’s birth certificate, as presented by the White House in April 2011, is a forgery based on an investigation by the ... more > * see link *
---------------------------------------------------------
By L. Todd Wood - - Thursday, June 25, 2015

Lately, I’ve noticed a new trend coming out of the Russian media and press releases from the Kremlin. The new narrative seems to be saying that the United States should stop lecturing other countries on foreign policy and foreign engagements because all you have to do is look at Iraq and Libya to see the American result — chaos. And you know what? They’re right.

As an American, it sickens me to see the complete waste of blood and treasure in Iraq. Libya is just a side-show, an add-on, but just a pathetic.

Iraq was a stable democracy when handed to Barack Obama in 2008. Now a beheading, jihadist caliphate is expanding across the region, threatening all in its path and knocking on the door of Baghdad. Iran is dictating behavior to the pro-Shia government in the capital. None of this is positive for freedom or stability in the region, or needless to say, the Iraqis who trusted and cooperated with us and now are being hunted like dogs by ISIS. The Kremlin is right to be frightened by the prospect of ISIS militants linking up with Islamic sympathizers in the Caucasus. When the Obama adminstration talks of military action in Syria, Moscow is right to be concerned. What would be the consequences of this use of force? The White House, at this point, does not inspire confidence that they have a well thought out plan for success. Quite the opposite. Russia would rather support Assad in Syria as they know he will maintain stability and their access to the Mediterranean, his human rights abuses and war crimes be damned. The alternative is worse in their eyes.

I’ve said all along that you have to look at results of President Obama’s actions versus what he says. The result in the Middle East is nothing short of disaster. It makes you wonder about the administration’s agenda.

Now you have Hillary Rodham Clinton wanting to be commander-in-chief and she stood at the podium as the bodies came home and knowingly lied to the families of the dead diplomats and soldiers. She denied assistance to the ambassador as he begged for months for more resources to protect his people and his mission. The phone rang at 2 a.m. and she ignored it to take money from the highest bidder. The prospect of her living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW doesn’t exactly inspire confidence. I don’t think she is necessarily pro-jihadist but she is definitely pro-whatever-brings-the-Clintons-more-money-and-power. If it’s China, some Arab sheik or Russia looking for uranium, it doesn’t matter. She doesn’t have the best interests of the country at heart.

You can easily say that American policy in the Middle East has been nothing short of extreme incompetence. But I have a disturbing feeling gnawing at my gut that there is more to it. There is something else that dare not to be mentioned, at least in the liberal media. As I said, you have to look at the results of Mr. Obama’s actions and not listen to his words. What are these results? I believe any thinking person would say a disastrous caliphate being stood up in the Middle East, Iran getting a nuclear weapon and threatening Israel’s existence, increased terrorist attacks in the United States, a refusal to call Islamic terrorism what it is, China hacking entire departments of classified data and ripping us off blind, terrorists streaming across the southern border, illegal immigrants being resettled in large numbers without the knowledge of the states or local communities, the American military on its way to levels not seen since before World War II, et cetera, et cetera.

It makes you wonder, doesn’t it? What could be the agenda allowing all of this to happen? Or should I say, encouraging all of this to happen? Yesterday, Judicial Watch released FBI files that said the most senior and trusted adviser to the president of the United States’ immediate and extended family was tightly connected to communist organizations and Soviet spies. Wait, what? Say that again? You’re joking right? Unfortunately, no, I’m not.

Can I see that birth certificate again please ?

Read more:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/25/l-todd-wood-can-i-see-birth-certificate-again-plea/#ixzz3e6WvssP1/
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

all you have to do is look on are shores
America has changed so much and next to none of it is like it was supose to be when they signed those papers long long ago
now it is lead by corrupt people that are not in the lead for us but in the lead for themselvs
who start wars for money
and are taking away are rights by leaps and bounds

<shrug> dont get me started

Iraq: stable? Are you f'n kidding me? Apparently you've never been there. Gw started the war in Iraq. He didn't find anything but sand and oil he had no way to get. Stable. More people were beheaded in Iraq between 911 and Jan 2009 than since. Obama and his administration inherited 2 wars. People said they wanted us out of there and Obama KEPT his word unlike W. He calls the idiots what they are,
Do YOU want to validate isil as the righteous kingship of Islam and all the middle east? They are 100% evidence of a power vacuum. Those idiots don't represent all Islamic people and if they did why would Iran be fighting them off in Iraq? Because Iran (not exactly our best ally) doesn't want those idiots to take control of the country who used to be their WORST ENEMY. Because they don't represent Islamic faith or any country. That's why.

a) I reject the implication that this is representative metaphor for Obama administration policy.

BUT !!

b) Yes.
It's called "setting backfire", and paradoxically, is a perfectly conventional method of "fighting fire with fire".

That's one example of intentional arson, they also set fires to burn out undergrowth or brush in forests. They also set fires in training facilities using all types of accelerants so they have experience when the real fires have to be put out. I have personally witnessed firedogs (U.S. Army firefighters) take on a
C-130 engine and fuselage fire where the accelerant was jet fuel. Hero. There is no other word that describes them.

anyone remember this?

Obama responded: "The analogy we use around here sometimes, and I think is accurate, is if a jayvee team puts on Lakers uniforms that doesnt make them Kobe Bryant." (For the nonsports fan, JV stands for junior varsity, and it usually means a high school or college's secondary team.)

and then came:

Keep in mind I wasnt specifically referring to (Islamic State)," Obama replied. "I've said that, regionally, there were a whole series of organizations that were focused primarily locally, weren’t focused on homeland, because I think a lot of us, when we think about terrorism, the model is Osama bin Laden and 9/11."

Politifact says:

Obama said his JV comment "wasnt specifically referring to ISIL." He was not specifically asked about Islamic State, but it's� pretty clear this is the group that was being referenced in the conversation. The transcript backs this up, as do news events from the time of the discussion.

We rate the statement False.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/sep/07/barack-obama/what-obama-said-about-islamic-state-jv-team/

just more proof that those "truth" websites are run by the same lying liberals... to bad the public liberals can't see the forest for the trees...

You have nothing but third hand third party opinion. You still haven't answered any of the questions. Going back after a situation has changed, doesn't make a non policy remark in an interview into a lie. Before the Obama administration KILLED OSAMA BIN LADEN, if asked anyone would say that the search for him must continue. No he's dead, should we keep looking and did anyone asked about the search lie when asked? Things change. The power vacuum sucked in something worse than al-Qaeda. Once we left Iraq under OBAMA, they focused where we did, in Afghanistan. We took out too many of them and after Bin Laden their own people laughed at them. They fizzled out. Now recruits join isil instead. They had a different agenda, an agenda destructive enough to make Iranians come to the rescue of their worst enemy and the few American troops on the ground in Baghdad because they know our airstrikes our retraining rearming and the Iraqis are not enough to hold back or defeat isil. Bash democrats all you want, republicans started the wars, republicans ordered every troop moment since and they still are.

What more proof is needed,
that ACORNs grow into mighty
squirrel feces?

Oh, please. Do you REALLY think that the entire right wing of the Republican Party is in on the deception of the Obama birth certificate?

Really?

Because in order for ANY of this nonsense to have any factual basis, you have to recognize that the entire Republican Party has gone along with it all for EIGHT FULL YEARS.

This is the party that actually spent millions of our tax dollars, to IMPEACH Clinton for screwing around on his wife. And you claim that they decided to do NOTHING to try to force someone out of office with an ACTUAL reason to do so?

Gimme a break.

Go away, and come back after you have something that at least makes the most rudimentary sense. Not this kind of kid stuff.

Besides, the fact that his birthplace was in question means that someone else had to request a notarized copy which would have been stamped signed and dated by the notary present in Hawaii at that time.

SERIOULSY ---
For one of the most corrupt - highly sued - over the top - bloviating - self-absorbed - narcissistic - Sheriff Depts. in our last 20 years the award would go to >>>>>

Top Ten Reasons to recall Joe
The staff at Arpaio.com has polled citizens and employees of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and has complied this Top Ten Reasons NOT to vote for Arpaio.

***1:With Arpaio, real law enforcement takes a backseat to publicity stunts.
As an example in one of Arpaio's latest stunts, and at a time when there were 12 unsolved execution-style murders in the county, he staged a massive prostitution round-up publicity stunt.

This two month "sting operation" involved over 350 deputies that were pulled off other investigative details and patrol that resulted in 80 cases that have all been declined for prosecution by the Maricopa County Attorney's Office.

Nicholas Hentoff of Phoenix wrote in a letter to the Editor of the Arizona Republic" If Joe Arpaio continues to spend the county's scarce law enforcement dollars on chasing consenting adults engaged in private sexual activity, while child murders and sexual assaults remain unsolved, he should be the one to explain to the next grieving mother why her child's killer has not been caught, prosecuted and put in prison. And the taxpayers should send him a message by electing a new sheriff who doesn't treat public funds as his private public relations piggybank."

2: He lives in a fantasy world of self-importance.
His claims of arresting Elvis Presley, breaking the French Connection, and being in weekly shoot-outs suggest a serious mental problem.

Some of his other claims include:
Arpaio: Invented the idea of housing inmates in tents.
Truth: This is untrue, the Arizona Department of Correction has used tents for decades. Facilities in other states also used tents before Arpaio.

Arpaio: Claims credit for feeding green bologna (surplus food) to inmates
Truth: Jails and prisons here in Arizona and all over the country feed surplus food to inmates and done so for many years.

3: Millions of tax dollars have been wasted on lawsuits

Lawsuits brought against Arpaio by employees, former employees, inmates, and the families of dead inmates have cost the county millions and Arpaio has misled the public about the cost to taxpayers of lawsuits.

The case of Scott Norberg, who died in jail, is a good example. Arpaio has frequently said the $8.25 million settlement cost the county nothing and was covered by insurance. What he does not say is that, at the time of the settlement, the county had a $1 million deductible.

Because of these lawsuits, the deductible for the sheriff's office insurance coverage has increase from $1 million to $5 million per incident.

4: He is responsible for a critical and dangerous shortage of personnel in both the jails and patrol.

This condition is unsafe for the officers, the inmates, and the public. This situation leads to more lawsuits which results in more millions of tax dollars wasted.

Arpaio has created a critical and dangerous shortage of deputy sheriffs needed to perform fundamental law enforcement services in the unincorporated areas of the County.

Deputies that could be assigned to patrol, are assigned instead as personal bodyguards for Sheriff Arpaio.

Detention officers, desperately needed in the jails, are assigned to the labor-intensive, publicity-producing chain gangs in order to get Arpaio on more TV news programs.

Projects that bolster Arpaio's ego, satisfy his need for publicity, and insure his personal safety are all fully staffed. Unfortunately, at the same time on the streets and in the jails of the county, lives are placed at risk by Arpaio's self-serving abuse of authority .

Also Sheriff Arpaio has the largest executive staff of any police agency in Arizona and perhaps the United States . By comparison, the Los Angles County Sheriff's Department, the nation's largest, has half as many on the executive staff. The millions spend on excess executive positions should be used to hire employees that could be assigned where really needed.

5: Hundreds of current sheriff's office employees, represented by a number of employee organizations, have expressed a vote of no confidence in Sheriff Arpaio.

Police officers associations throughout the State of Arizona have voted "no confidence" in Joe Arpaio as Sheriff! These include; State of Arizona Fraternal Order of Police, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge Five, Maricopa County Deputies Association, Arizona Cops.

If the police officers in the State of Arizona have no confidence in Joe, why should you?

6: The self proclaimed "Toughest Sheriff in America " is too fearful to debate other candidates.

There have been several debates scheduled this year between the candidates that are running for the Office of Sheriff. All the candidates have appeared minus one, Joe Arpaio.

Why is Joe so afraid to debate his policies in public with the other candidates? Could it be that he couldn't read from his "scripted" speech that he has given hundreds of times before other public gatherings where he makes his outlandish claims to fame.

Several years ago Sheriff Arpaio visited the outlying patrol districts of the Sheriff's Office to what was suppose to be a "question and answer" meeting between his employees. Instead at each of these four meetings he started out with his canned political speech telling the deputies how important he was and that they depended upon him for their jobs. At District's Two and Three, he was politely asked by Patrol Sergeant's in attendance if he could answer questions from the deputies. He hesitantly stated that he wasn't prepared to answer any questions but would try. He was then asked basic questions that involved officer safety issues, the lack of training, and pay issues. Arpaio fumbled trying to answer, and on several occasions sidestepped the question entirely. Weeks after these meetings, the deputies and sergeants that asked these questions to Sheriff Arpaio were transferred to newly created positions within the office. One assignment was being stationed in the basement of the main jail on graveyard to answer a telephone that never rang, and another to the property room, inventorying items in storage.

7: Arpaio routinely abuses his authority for personal, political, and vindictive reasons.

Two Republicans and an Independent running against Arpaio have all alleged abuses of power on the part of Sheriff Arpaio. In 2002, the county settled a lawsuit out of court with former employee Steve Barnes for wrongful termination after he blew the whistle on questionable tactics by the sheriff's office.

Barnes claimed that Arpaio's office wiretapped former Arpaio aide Tom Bearup and that it had targeted County Attorney Rick Romley for surveillance. Bearup, W. Steven Martin and Dan Saban, all running for sheriff against Arpaio this year, have also reported that they have been followed and harassed by sheriff's deputies.

Another example would also be the arrest of Nick Tarr, otherwise known as "Joe Arizona". In 2020 there were three hot propositions involving Indian gaming in Arizona, Nick's "Joe Arizona" character supported racetracks having slot machines, Sheriff Joe was supporting a proposition that kept Indian gaming on Indian land. For Halloween Nick decided to campaign in downtown Phoenix dressed as an officer. He went into his prop closet can came out with an old uniform shirt from DPS, his trademark "I Love Arizona" t-shirt, and a pair of Arpaio's pink boxer shorts.

Dave Hendersott, chief Deputy of the Sheriff's Office spotted Nick and he called DPS twice to have them come out and give Nick a citation. DPS officers came out and decided there was no crime. Undaunted, Hendershott then ordered his own deputies to arrest Tarr of impersonating an officer.

The charges against Tarr we later dropped and Tarr now has a lawsuit against the Sheriff's Office.

8: Many community leaders and concerned organizations have looked beyond the smokescreen to see the corruption and incompetence of the Arpaio administration.

Sheriff Joe used to boast of 80% approval ratings amongst the voters of Maricopa County . But as the truth gets out about how he really runs one of the nations largest Sheriff's Offices, his popularity is taking a nose dive! Currently the O'Neal survey lists his approval rating at only 35%

As an example, the Son's of Italy dropped Arpaio as being a "Top Cop" cited controversy over allegations of people dying or being seriously injured while being held in Arpaio's jails. "I just believe that law enforcement officers, like Caesar's wife, must be above suspicion," De Sanctis said, making reference to William Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar." "There's too much controversy right now for us to include Sheriff Arpaio in our report," she said.

9: Sheriff Joe Arpaio has deceived, misinformed and outright lied to the public!

He lies about his personal history, the cost of lawsuits, the effectiveness of his programs, and the money he claims to have saved taxpayers. He takes false credit for posses, chain gangs, tent jails, feeding surplus food to inmates, and pink underwear.

There are numerous examples that we can find where Sheriff Joe has outright lied to the public.

As an example, Arpaio spent over $10,000 in tax payer money to have Arizona State University study recidivism in his jail system. ASU found that there was no change in the rate at which inmates returned to the jail. Joe has discounted this study as false and continues to claim that his jail program has reduced crime in the valley.

Another claim is that Sheriff Joe has saved county tax payers millions of dollars because of his innovative programs. Then why can't he control his budget? Why was he $7 million dollars in the hole in 1999/2000/2001 and where did the money go? Why was Loretta Barkell put into the Finance Director with a title of Deputy Chief? Because the BOS put her there and told Chief Hendershott that if he got a handle on the budget he would get his raise.

10: Arpaio's self-serving and ego-driven actions have severely damaged relations between the sheriff's office and other government organizations. .

Joe Arpaio filed a law suit against the BOS over the money and he hired outside attorneys to represent him. Joe and County Attorney Richard Romley have never got along in any way. He has never advised the City of Phoenix P.D. of his "Joe Shows" or asked if they wanted help and just moved in.
http://www.arpaio.com/top-ten/index.php
****************************

***Cold case file my happy arse; those 'BARNEY FIFE' wanna-be's can't be caught doing their REAL JOBS and this moron is making claims that he's found a crack/lie in POTUS's birth certificate!

Blows the mind what some HUMANS will swallow when they've been fed such heinous BS from former POTUS and still deny their culpable lies and facts that should have had that president impeached!
SMH --- gullible and SHEEPLE-PEOPLE

***********************
Fact: POTUS - Nixon lied and was caught many times over - resigned to save face and to disappear prior to being told to 'GET OUT'

Fact: POTUS - Ronald Reagan lied..."I did not order arms & ammunition to be sold/sent to the Contras"; and despite ignoring what Congress had told him 'NO, you can't be doing that'. Ego busting dear Ronald Reagan did it anyway! That's an impeachable offence and then he sold ARMS & WEAPONS to IRAN - used the excess over payment to purchase those Arms & Weapons for the Contra's and allowed Oliver North to take the dive for his illegal actions!

Fact: POTUS - GHWB #43 - "Read my lips: no new taxes" and then did exactly the opposite {but on the scale of lies and truth --- that seems to fall into the cracks} and where exactly was GHWB during all those high level meetings about the Contra & Iran arms deals? Gee, now that's a story all in it's self...but no problem it seems to not matter greatly to those that want to nit-pick about a birth certificate --- LMAO

Fact: POTUS - Clinton - "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"; and we allowed a mentally driven AG with a vendetta to push that issue with such great gusto it cost us tax payers 80 million dollars!!! And Clinton still left office with a budget excess...LMAO

Fact: POTUS - GWB "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" and >>> The 935 lies of George W. Bush / Yes, you already knew. But now they're actually quantifiable. http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/morford/article/The-935-lies-of-George-W-Bush-Yes-you-already-3296633.php
*******************************

And here we are again reading some more utter BS rehash about a 'BIRTHER' fretting issue because the 'BIRTHERS' tin foil hat wearing crowd just can't let it go!

WOWSERS...I've not had such a hearty LMAO moment in such a long-long time.

2old

And suddenly a hush came over the crowd.....

When asked about the post-Iran contretemps, I said repeatedly on a number of radio shows this week that if I had to choose who was the bigger liar, Obama or Khameni, there was no contest - Obama.

Obama is a liar. Pathological. Is there anything he hasn't lied about?

You can keep your doctor.
The Benghazi attack was the fault of a YouTube video.
There was no stand down order.
Islam is peace.
Obama on IRS Scandal: "Not Even A Smidgen Of Corruption"
"My position hasn't changed" on using executive authority to address immigration issues.
Says his comment about extremists being a JV team "wasn't specifically referring to" the Islamic State.
Afghanistan is the good war.
The "most realistic estimates" for jobs created by Keystone XL are "maybe 2,000 jobs during the construction of the pipeline."
"My father served in World War II"
"No more Illegal Wire Tapping of American Citizens"
"Throughout, we have kept Congress fully informed of our efforts" to create a legal framework on counterterrorism.
"Over the last four years, the deficit has gone up, but 90 percent of that is as a consequence of" President George W. Bush's policies and the recession. (Fast and Furious began in 2009,)
"The only time government employment has gone down during a recession has been under me."

He is a pathological liar. The Iranians may scam the talks in order to buy time to build their nuclear arsenal, but Obama is the liar.

So I ask you, who do you believe?

EXCLUSIVE: Iranian Parliament Releases "Factsheet" for Revision of Lausanne
Statement
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13940126001122
- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/04/list-of-obamas-lies-and-iranian-fact-sheet-that-completely-contradicts-white-house.html/#sthash.SqJ14B4W.dpuf

A perfect analogy.

You gotta be frikken kidding me

Again? Still be beating the dead Birth document horse?

Haven't you heard? there are serious flag issues going on!


That, and he's been leading for for close to 8 years, give it a break already

The date of certification on the birth cert is 2007. Why did it take so long to make it public? He was elected in 2009.

and whats this Barry Soetoro stuff and the fake social security number?

AP- WASHINGTON D.C. - In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obamas qualifications for the presidency, the group Americans for Freedom of Information has released copies of President Obamas college transcripts from Occidental College. Released today, the transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school. The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship. This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obamas detractors have been seeking.
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/occidental.asp#PbLHtRT1GLvzVtPC.99


Maybe Obamas propensity for lying created such doubts?

Yes the Ukraine, Chechnyen and Chernobol are such sterling examples that have earned the Russians their bragging rights.


not to mention their own less than remarkable record in India Pakistan, and Asia Minor ...