What a revealing insight!
I deduce your derisive, disrespectful "obarry" reference is to President Obama.

The reality is, I defend the truth, and advocate for conservative political values.

Yet in your mind, that's:

You flatter Obama, and to some extent me, I suppose.

I'm too s a v v y to identify myself in the negative; by what I am not.
We are defined by what we are, and I am politically & fiscally conservative. Not only talk the talk, but walk the walk. The only debt I carry is that which accrues between billing periods on my credit cards. I pay no interest on them; so basically it's the bank giving me interest free loans each month.
I own my diesel tractor, my motorcycle, my car, my home, and my estate free and clear; no mortgage, no loan.
I do it. And Uncle Sam should too.

I'm most likely far to the right of you, and unquestionably of our Republican congressional leadership, both loony lefties to me.
- Neither has advocated repealing all U.S. federal entitlement programs: that means Social Security, and all the rest of it.
Speaker Boehner (R-OH) doesn't advocate that.
Majority Leader McConnell (R-KY) doesn't advocate that.

I don't consider the VA an entitlement. I consider it an earned benefit; and I advocate preserving that, and that alone.

- I advocate surplus budgets and paying off the debt.
Rand Paul is the only one I know of that might support that. Is he "tea party"?

- The root word of "conservatism" means to conserve. What I intend to conserve is out 18th Century most noble principles. And they are articulated wisely by our Founders:

I cyber-indulge you here mm because I am in some sense a patient man. I'm relatively new here, just tonight eclipsing the 300 post count.
I don't need to explain myself to you.
I don't need your validation.
And patient though I may be, I don't have the time to bring you up to speed on reality.

I merely offer you these very generous didactic insights so you in exchange will address my policy positions; and stop trying to confuse our fellow members by you so grossly misrepresenting my positions with false labels and little else.

If mislabeling is the best you can do, perhaps a children's forum would be more your speed.

well, you can spend another hour writing another 8 paragraphs explaining why you don't need to explain or validate yourself, but i probably won't read it either... people can "consider" themselves whatever they want, it makes no difference.... your a liberal, even tho you can't force yourself to admit it...

What a insipid response. You put words in my mouth so you can shoot them down? Do you even understand of what a straw man argument consists?

Rogue nations should be boycotted, shunned, blockaded if necessary to ruin their economies. Iran was close to caving when Obama started cutting them slack. The "negotiate or war" argument never existed.

However, in this case, war might actually be necessary. Iran is the number one sponsor of State terrorism and is expected to use a nuke if it can get it's hands on one. It is using the "negotiations" as a ploy to stall for time. Eventually, soon, they will have the bomb and then they will fall into the realm of North Korea but with an extra dose of hate for others, not the nations you have chosen as comparisons.

When they get the bomb, they will use it. That's what were dealing with. We do it now or suffer down the road.

liberals don't understand that... they think we can sit, hold hands and sing kom-by-ya and everything will be ok...

Iran should be turned into radioactive obsidian.

i think they should take out Iran before they(Iran) take out Israel...

or at least a pretty place.