Mater, have you ever actually read a book? Or, do you get all of your information from blogs?

I collect antique books.

"Conspiracy theory", and "conspiracy theorist", were both terms that were in use, during the u.S. civil war, and especially after Lincoln's assassination.

Christians In Action, may have brought the terms back into vogue.
But, they sure as Hell, didn't invent or coin either term.

Funny you should mention this because, I think Conrad works for the Bilderbergs.

i read from time to time, last book i read was called go ask alice, its a good one. the CIA starting using "conspiracy theorist" in the 60s as a derogatory word, to make people who question the truth look bad.

nope, probably just close minded, thats all.

No, He's a hit man for the NWO.

whos his handler? razor ramon?

No, Jesse Ventura

Would usa be a better place if wrestlers were in the white house? Coz that will happen soon...lol

JESSIE VENTURA 2016!!!!

Mater, agreed. Go ask Alice, is an entertaining read.

In 1967, the C.I.A., was headed by
George Herbert Walker Bush.

Later, as potus, many of us knew
George H. W. Bush, simply as, "Twinkie".

As potus, Twinkie brought terms,
such as, "wouldn't be prudent, at this juncture", into vogue.

Twinkie, didn't invent, create, or coin
any words, terms, or phrases.

Genesis 06.15, and then Twinkie begat Dubya...

honestly it cant get much worse. jesse ventura would make a good president.

yea go ask alice was a good time.
haha twinkie

“Conspiracy Theory”: Foundations of a Weaponized Term
Subtle and Deceptive Tactics to Discredit Truth in Media and Research

Conspiracy theory” is a term that at once strikes fear and anxiety in the hearts of most every public figure, particularly journalists and academics. Since the 1960s the label has become a disciplinary device that has been overwhelmingly effective in defining certain events off limits to inquiry or debate. Especially in the United States raising legitimate questions about dubious official narratives destined to inform public opinion (and thereby public policy) is a major thought crime that must be cauterized from the public psyche at all costs.

Conspiracy theory’s acutely negative connotations may be traced to liberal historian Richard Hofstadter’s well-known fusillades against the “New Right.” Yet it was the Central Intelligence Agency that likely played the greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. In the groundswell of public skepticism toward the Warren Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the CIA sent a detailed directive to all of its bureaus. Titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report,” the dispatch played a definitive role in making the “conspiracy theory” term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question.

This important memorandum and its broad implications for American politics and public discourse are detailed in a forthcoming book by Florida State University political scientist Lance de-Haven-Smith, Conspiracy Theory in America. Dr. de-Haven-Smith devised the state crimes against democracy concept to interpret and explain potential government complicity in events such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the major political assassinations of the 1960s, and 9/11.

“CIA Document 1035-960” was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York Times. The directive is especially significant because it outlines the CIA’s concern regarding “the whole reputation of the American government” vis-à-vis the Warren Commission Report. The agency was especially interested in maintaining its own image and role as it “contributed information to the [Warren] investigation.”

The memorandum lays out a detailed series of actions and techniques for “countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.” For example, approaching “friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors)” to remind them of the Warren Commission’s integrity and soundness should be prioritized. “[T]he charges of the critics are without serious foundation,” the document reads, and “further speculative discussion only plays in to the hands of the [Communist] opposition.”

The agency also directed its members “[t]o employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose.”

1035-960 further delineates specific techniques for countering “conspiratorial” arguments centering on the Warren Commission’s findings. Such responses and their coupling with the pejorative label have been routinely wheeled out in various guises by corporate media outlets, commentators and political leaders to this day against those demanding truth and accountability about momentous public events.

No significant new evidence has emerged which the [Warren] Commission did not consider.
Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others.
Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States.
Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they light on some theory and fall in love with it.
Oswald would not have been any sensible person’s choice for a co-conspirator.
Such vague accusations as that “more than ten people have died mysteriously” [during the Warren Commission’s inquiry] can always be explained in some natural way e.g.: the individuals concerned have for the most part died of natural causes.

Today more so than ever news media personalities and commentators occupy powerful positions for initiating propaganda activities closely resembling those set out in 1035-960 against anyone who might question state-sanctioned narratives of controversial and poorly understood occurrences. Indeed, as the motives and methods encompassed in the document have become fully internalized by intellectual workers and operationalized through such media, the almost uniform public acceptance of official accounts concerning unresolved events such as the Oklahoma City Murrah Federal Building bombing, 9/11, and most recently the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, is largely guaranteed.

The effect on academic and journalistic inquiry into ambiguous and unexplained events that may in turn mobilize public inquiry, debate and action has been dramatic and far-reaching. One need only look to the rising police state and evisceration of civil liberties and constitutional protections as evidence of how this set of subtle and deceptive intimidation tactics has profoundly encumbered the potential for future independent self-determination and civic empowerment.

and you would actually vote for him?

hes a constitutionalist, so yes i would vote for him. navy seal, mayor, governor. he'd have my vote.

People that raise outlandish conspiracies discredit themselves. As time has gone on it seems the more outlandish the claim the more publicity that person gets on the so called alternative media.

yea alot of conspiracy's are complete BS. im not gonna say that every conspiracy theory is true, far from it, but some deserve more investigation.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200909/field-guide-the-conspiracy-theorist-dark-minds

http://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-23/edition-7/truth-out-there

like which ones...

was jefferson airplane the author?