http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2015/03/obamas-treason-is-new-patriotism.html


When Republicans complained that Obama refused to talk about Islamic terrorism, he accused them of playing into the hands of ISIS by demanding that he identify the enemy we're fighting.

When they spoke out against his Iranian nuclear sellout, he accused them of "wanting to make common cause with the hardliners in Iran".

Those hardliners would presumably toe a harder line than Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who responded to Obama's outreach in his first term by saying, "The Islamic peoples all over the world chant "Death to America!"" and who stated last year that "This battle will only end when the society can get rid of the oppressors "front with America at the head of it."

(The Supreme Leader of a country which stones teenage rape victims and rapes teenage girls so that they don't die as virgins, also claimed that "The European races are barbaric.")

If the moderate Supreme Leader that Obama is dealing with wants Death to America, what could the real hardliners want for America that's even worse than death? A third term of Obama?

Meanwhile Joe Biden, Obama's number two, accused Republicans of undermining Obama. This would be the same Biden who threatened to impeach President Bush if he bombed Iran's nuclear program and who blasted Bush and the idea of an Axis of Evil at a fundraiser in the home of a pro-Iran figure.

Biden undermined President Bush's efforts to rein in Iran's terrorism by voting against listing the Revolutionary Guard, which was supplying weapons to help the Taliban kill American soldiers, as a terrorist group (a position he shared with Kerry, Hagel and Obama) and berating Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for not negotiating with Iran and Assad.

The toadying of "Tehran Joe" to Iran had already reached its absolute lowest point when Biden responded to the terrorist attacks of September 11 by suggesting, "Seems to me this would be a good time to send, no strings attached, a check for $200 million to Iran."

The administration that Biden is part of has instead been releasing $490 million a month to Iran.

Biden, along with Kerry and Hagel, became notorious as the Tehran Trio during the Bush years for their advocacy for Iran and Assad, and their appearances at pro-Iranian lobbying groups and fundraisers despite criticism from Iranian democracy advocates. Biden, Kerry and Hagel, Obama's VP, the Secretary of State and the former Secretary of Defense, all appeared at American-Iranian Council events, a group whose founder stated that he is "the Iranian lobby in the United States."

Treason doesn't get more treasonous than that.

Obama and Biden, along with their political allies, are trying to spin their shameless pandering to a terrorist state as patriotic and opposition to it as treasonous. The New York Daily News denounced senators opposed to an Obama deal giving Iran the ability to develop and deploy nuclear weapons as "Traitors". The administration's social media allies hashtag dubbed Republicans opposed to Iran's nuclear weapons as #47Traitors.

Traitors oppose terrorists getting nuclear weapons. Patriots like Joe Biden not only support it, but they blast a president trying to stop it while collecting $30,000 at a pro-Iranian fundraiser.

"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?" Sir John Harrington cynically observed. "Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

But the Elizabethan courtier left out that when traitors rule, patriotism becomes treason. Obama commits treason and taunts his critics as traitors.

Republicans who want to see American leadership rise to the challenge of ISIS and Iran are accused of collaborating with ISIS and Iran by an administration that willfully lied and misrepresented the growth of ISIS for as long as it could and that is now doing the same thing for Iran's nuclear threat.

Obama lied and claimed that ISIS was no threat even when it was taking over entire cities. Only overt genocide by ISIS forced him into his current stumbling action against it. Now the same sports fan who dubbed ISIS a "Jayvee" team not worth bothering with accuses Republicans of playing into its hands.

Sensible people consider letting a terrorist group win to be "playing into its hands". Left-wing apologists for terror however claim that fighting terrorists "plays into their hands". In the same inverted worldview in which patriotism becomes treason and treason becomes patriotism, what terrorists want most is for you to bomb them to oblivion while what they fear most is that you'll just stand there and let them kill you.

Now Obama suggests that critics of his Iran nuclear sellout are playing into the hands of some imaginary hardliners who want America to bomb its nuclear program. These imaginary hardliners, like the imaginary terrorists, want to sabotage their own efforts to achieve their goals. And only Obama stands between them and the failure of their terroristic and nuclear ambitions. That's why he's a patriot.

And if you can follow all that, you qualify for a gig as the State Department's new spokesperson.

Ignoring terrorists is patriotic. Fighting them is unpatriotic. Dealing with their actual beliefs is unpatriotic. Pretending that they have no beliefs, no matter how impossible it makes it to predict their actions and fight them, is patriotic. Stopping Iran from getting nuclear weapons is unpatriotic. The patriotic thing to do is to cut a deal that will let Iran go the way of North Korea.

Through the intercession of Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton struck a non-binding agreement with North Korea on its nuclear weapons program. Like Obama's Iran deal, the Senate never got to ratify it. Secretary of State Madeline Albright stated that "he framework agreement is one of the best things that the administration has done because it stopped a nuclear weapons program in North Korea." It didn't.

During his original campaign, Obama said, "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon." That should sound familiar. Bill Clinton said during his first term in office, "North Korea cannot be allowed to develop a nuclear bomb." North Korea could and did. Bill Clinton knew all along that it could and would.

The rhetoric from back then also sounds familiar. Congressman Obey warned that Republicans dropping millions in fuel oil for North Korea was "mindbogglingly reckless." The Honolulu Star-Bulletin urged "Stop GOP Meddling in Foreign Affairs." Gore ranted that Republicans were "determined to wreck a presidency in order to recapture it" and accused them of "isolationism and defeatism".

The Republicans were right. North Korea got the bomb and a lot of freebies from American taxpayers. The men and women responsible for supporting that disastrously treasonous policy slimed them for it. Now we're in a repeat with many of the same politicians and pundits arguing that the only way to stop Iran from getting the bomb is by not doing anything to stop it from getting the bomb.

The first rule of treason is to call the other guy a traitor. Having aligned with everyone from Castro to the Supreme Leader of Iran, Obama has to make it seem as if it's the Republicans who are the traitors.

An administration of political hacks who spent the Bush years undermining the White House in every way possible short of officially defecting to the enemy now claim that dissent from their policy is treason. And they top that by reversing the motives of Iran and ISIS so that instead of wanting to destroy America, they really want to be criticized by Republicans and prevented from getting nuclear weapons.

This gibberish shouldn't be able to fool any thinking person, but the idea that Kim Jong-Il wanted food, not nuclear weapons, when his entire policy had been the exact opposite, shouldn't have gotten by anyone with an elementary knowledge of history and at least a single living brain cell.

But it did.

No one wants to be a member of a party of traitors or of a government of traitors. Clinton and Obama didn't accidentally stumble into their policies. They were guided by a deep rotten belief that the United States was always wrong and that the enemy, no matter how evil, had a legitimate grievance.

They can't admit to this treasonous idea, even though they repeat it constantly in various forms, so their only defense is to claim that their treason is patriotism and that anyone who disagrees is a traitor.

I got it now had to read the whole thing ... + look up your link which no one on that blog has replied to ... I am not saying what your are saying is not legit but why wasn't this brought up somewhere the public could know more about it ... you got me I don't understand what or why they would do that but would not be the first time giving things like weapons to our enemies... would it ... as we find this out later on ...

treason is not just war, it's anything that can harm the country as a whole...

spies are charged with treason with no war...

like no weapons of mass destruction ...

really?

they sold Saddam the weapons, they knew they were somewhere, like Syria... so then, an uprising by rebels against Assad? and who does our country back in that? The rebels.... after we gave them money and weapons to help overthrow Assad, they turn in ISIS...

bush, obarry, different sides of the same coin

Quote by mightymoe:
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2015/03/obamas-treason-is-new-patriotism.html
===========================

I was looking at the source used for the OP and found the original website to be...http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dgreenfield/obamas-treason-is-the-new-patriotism/

One of the websites FrontPageMag.com links to at the link I posted is under the heading of "Jew Hatred".

They also link to ...http://www.blackbookoftheamericanleft.com/...

Hmmm... the...american...left....Imagine that?

Here is the contents of their "About" page.

About
Learn more about the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

Biography
Learn more about David Horowitz

Books and Booklets
Summaries of David Horowitz’s books and links to purchase the online bookstore.

Articles Archive
Access to David Horowitz’s articles, highlighting the most recent articles.

Replies to (Leftwing) Critics
David Horowitz replies to (Leftwing) Critics.

Debates with and about the Left
David Horowitz debates with and about the left.

Horowitz in Depth

Read the Analyses of David Horowitz’s Books
Watch David Horowitz on C-SPAN’s “In Depth”
Multimedia
Videos and audio files of David Horowitz’s media appearances.

Bibliography
A complete retrospective of all of David Horowitz’s works, including books, columns, and articles.

Request David as a Guest Speaker
David Horowitz is not only a respected author, but also regularly appears on television and radio. David may also available to speak at your event upon request. For more information, please click here to contact Elizabeth Ruiz.
-----------------------------------


David Horowitz to put it mildly is a notorious Islamophobic hate monger. His work has been widely debunked all over the web.

Front page mag also links to 'Jihad Watch"; Robert Spencer's infamous hate mnongering website.

Robert Spencer also having been widely debunked all over the web.

Sort of makes me wonder....why all of this promotion of hate?



Cui Bono ... (Latin for "Who benefits" ?)




Has 0bama committed treason by not willing to start World War 3 for the Bank of Rothschild? Or, for Goldman Sachs?

The Bank of Rothschild being the principal owner of the Federal Reserve in America. Goldman Sachs takes a cut of the pie as well.

Cui Bono....

Here's a headline from today...

Senate Dems Prepared to Defy Obama, Oppose Iran Deal
http://news.antiwar.com/2015/03/15/senate-dems-prepared-to-defy-obama-oppose-iran-deal/

Absoflippinglutely unbelievable.

It is very obvious these people have been given their "30 pieces of silver" by both AIPAC and Israel, and are taking the money, and running away from a reasonable deal with Iran.

Did these folks get the memo that Russia has just recently signed a military agreement with Iran?!?

I will guarantee you: an attack against Iran will surely draw Russia into the fray militarily.

And the US military, at this time in its history, doesn't have the money, the manufacturing, or the troop strength to guarantee a positive outcome to a war against Russia; and that is what makes the military option so scarily dangerous.

I don't like 0bama either; but his not starting WW3 for the Rothschilds or GS isn't treason.

It's simple, common sense.


Cui Bono.