Why Does The CDC Own a Patent on Ebola ‘Invention?’ Ebola Man Made?

http://topinfopost.com/2014/08/05/why-does-the-cdc-own-a-patent-on-ebola-invention-ebola-man-made

2 cured in the US.

UN claims, Ebola out of control in Africa.

The truth is that there are millions of plants, animals, insects, germs, virus', and other lifeforms that we haven't discovered yet. Most of them are in the rainforests. One day, we could discover the one that kills us all.

This thread reminds of a trip to Edna, Texas to go camping and I was thinking about going swimming in the lake. I went over to the water and found a big sign that said "Warning! Flesh Eating Bacteria! Swim at your own risk!"

I didn't go swimming and wondered about the people who did!

Anything is possible.......we had an Ebola scare here in Australia only yesterday......so "they" are either worried or just trying to scare us again..

That's not what the article I read says, though it's close to what the article I read is trying to get people to believe:

http://www.naturalnews.com/046290_ebola_patent_vaccines_profit_motive.html


It clearly states it's NOT the strain currently circulating in Africa; it came from Uganda.

It clearly states THIS man-made strain used a STRAIN of ebola (there are several) in its manufacture.

It then goes on to say that the U.S. government got the patent to use it as a monopoly source in developing money-making vaccines.



Quite the contrary...by the CDC placing a patent on it, it removes the pharmaceutical companies, who HAVE been cashing in on "cures", from developing anything close to it and getting a patent and turning it into a "cash-for-cure" venture. By placing a patent on it, it allows them TO deliver vaccines to Africa in their planned-and-hoped-for 3-month window, after they finish their unprecedented lack-of-animal-and-straight-to-humans trials with their drugs they "own".


Everyone can remove their tin-foil hats and let their heads breathe for a few moments, now.

What tinfoil?

Where Does the Virus Come From?
The exact origin, locations, and natural habitat (known as the natural reservoir) of Ebola virus remain unknown.

It could be man made and introduced to animals.

Africa being the testing grounds.

It could be a whole bunch of things, including dropped off during previous alien visits to our planet and God's latest plague sent upon the inhabitants of His one-and-only inhabited and favorite planet.

Until proof of anything to contrary (supposition and fantastical ponderings are NOT "proof"), I'll go ahead and go with the information from the authorities from WHO ("World Health Organization"), ignoring the *fact*, of course, that they, too, are all part of the grand conspiracy and are working in cahoots with the CDC, who is funded by the US Government, via secretly funneled monies from the CIA, who is owned and operated by the New World Order, of which President Obama is the founding member, as he's been alive for 300+ years, because not only is he not a naturally-born U.S. citizen, he's not even a naturally-born native of our planet.



My ignorance IS my bliss, thankyouverymuchfornoticing.

Excused.

WHO ain't got a clue to the origin.
All they clan guess is dome type of animal is it's host.

Isn't WHO da who what cl aimed swine flu was the next pandemic?

@ willing2:

Touche...sorta.


What's the reputable, non-conspiracy-tainted source for all YOUR accepted-as-Gospel knowledge, beliefs, and ponderings? You post a lot of stuff, presented as fact, in both your threads and your posts, but I've never noticed you citing many legitimate, reputable sources.

But I have noticed, figuratively-speaking, that when others refute your presented-as-fact facts BY citing legitimate, reputable sources, you smugly dismiss them as part of 'the conspiracy'.



Is there NO established knowledge on the planet that you CAN accept as truth and fact or is what's true and factual to you, that which simply sounds/feels good all the while it's flying in the face of reality?


I realize that what I've written may appear to be "an attack", but it surely isn't intended to be. I'd like to have intelligent conversations, which flow back-and-forth, with an exchange of ideas - some in concert and agreement and others in conflict and disagreement - without being on the receiving end of "That's hogwash!" each time I present evidentiary links and thoughtful responses.

It smacks of 'what pops off the top of your head' has more validity than what I type...and cite...and for which I provide back-up documentation


simply because male fingers are typing your thoughts and female fingers are typing mine.

This is where and it's also all over the net.

Not one person has been able to say ebola originates from a NATURAL source.

http://ebola.emedtv.com/ebola-virus/ebola-virus.html
WHO. Pigs Fly.

WHO is not a legitimate, reputable source but emedtv.com is. emedtv.com is owned and operated by Clinero, Inc., which was founded in 2004.

http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=53076767

From that page: "(Clinero's) Web site eMedTV.com provides demographic, display, and video healthcare advertising services."



Not one reputable source has not been able to say/prove that it DIDN'T originate from a "NATURAL" source. All reputable sources say its origin is unknown, including the "legitimate and reputable" advertising services site you'd cited.


So, because - factually-speaking - it hasn't been determined to be a naturally-occurring virus, you're going to run with - and accept as Gospel - that the CDC *man*ufactured all strains of ebola and is currently infecting certain regions of Africa with one of them at the bequest of the U.S. government as Weapons of Mass Destruction, because there's no hyperbole in any of that.



Got it.

Don't look like it.

My title was a question. Not a statement.

Let me type that a little slower. Q U E S T I O N.

Got it?

Good.

^^^ Your quote.

Note: no question marks; periods were used, ergo "statements".

If "It could be man made", it is equally "could be" naturally-occurring, yet you've yet to make a single post even considering that possibility and poo-pooing anyone who is reminding you that it's a just-as-equal-possibility it's naturally-occurring, to support your "statements" that the CDC created it as a Weapon of Mass Destruction - with no hyperbole intended, of course - and by using more legitimate and reputable sources, like eMedTV.com (an advertising services site owned by Clinaero, Inc.) than the World Health Organization could ever hope to be.





You're welcome.

Yeppers, the WHO is credible, alrighty-gee-golly-wow.

GENEVA — The World Health Organization says the swine flu outbreak is moving closer to becoming a pandemic.

WHO flu chief Dr. Keiji Fukuda told reporters on Wednesday that developments in the disease are moving the agency closer to raising its pandemic alert to phase 5, indicating widespread human-to-human transmission.

He said the health body was monitoring the situation but was not yet ready to move the pandemic alert level up from its current level of 4, which means it is being passed among people.

Phase 6 is the highest in the scale and is for a full-scale pandemic.

Fukuda said there was no evidence the virus was slowing down.

@ willing2:

You ARE aware that the "world" is a much bigger place than that which is contained within the 4 boundaries of the United States, right?

Merriam-Webster: "occurring over a wide geographic area and affecting an exceptionally high proportion of the population."

WHO: "A pandemic is basically a global epidemic -- an epidemic that spreads to more than one continent."

"The CDC's definition of a flu epidemic relates to the percentage of deaths in a given week caused by influenza and pneumonia."

http://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/features/what-is-pandemic



If people aren't dying from it, it's not an "epidemic"; there can be a "pandemic" in which not a single person in the U.S. is infected by - nor dies from it.



With that (new) understanding, what part of the WHO's news release is factually incorrect and which source(s) do you have to prove it is errant and invalid?

This part is false, >>>>>Fukuda said there was no evidence the virus was slowing down.

And,it was proven the regular flu kills off more folks than the swine flu scare did.

Now. How many cases since the pandemic scare have ya heard of over the news?

@ willing2:


Earlier (and repeatedly), I asked you for citations to credible sources for your statements-presented-as-fact, because you were figuratively saying, "Hogwash!" to everything I present while including citations to legitimate and reputable sources. I stated that it appears that you believe what YOU say carries more validity simply because male fingers are typing, as opposed to my female fingers.

Rather than include citations, you simply changed your pro pic from a man to a woman.


In another thread, you quoted me and stated that "(I) type like a troll". I called you on it. You then claimed you weren't talking about me...even though you'd quoted me, when making your post AT me.


In yet another thread, you followed me, quoted me, removed all of the words of my reply, save one - a directly-quoted (complete with quotation marks) derogatory term that was used by the OP of the thread in his op. You did this deliberately to make it appear that I had introduced the ban-worthy word TO the discussion and then made your post, letting me know of its ban-worthiness.


In this thread, in my last post to you, I specifically asked you to provide a citation to a legitimate source that proves the released statement from WHO was errant and invalid; you chose, instead, to simply reiterate that it is wrong, and included no citations, legitimate or otherwise...not even to a site which provides advertising services, from where you get (at least) some of your legitimate and reputable information.


I told you earlier that I am here to enjoy intelligent discourse - whether it be in agreement or disagreement. You - repeatedly and seizing every available opportunity - have chosen not to/proven yourself incapable of honoring my request for an intelligent conversation.


YOU will get no more of MY participation in your failed attempts to have one.

But, because I am gracious, I WILL directly address your last question to me (something you've rarely done with my questions of you):



None. It's all part of the New World Order's plan to manipulate and control all of what idiots, such as myself, believe is factual and reality-based but that only people such as yourself, who refuse to have intelligent conversations, are smart enough to see through.


Well, that...and I don't subscribe to the news channels/news sources of the other 195/196 countries in the world, so I'd hardly be aware of epidemics that are on their way to becoming pandemics. A pandemic occurring in Nauru, Tuvalu, and Palau ('more than one country in the same geographic area') with people dying from what was simply a flu epidemic is hardly news-worthy, here. Until, of course, a suspected carrier lands at SFO or JFK; THEN it'll be on the news.


Here in the U.S. we're very ethnocentric and only concerned with that which directly affects us.


YOU know.

Back on topic.

Africa should be quarantined til this outbreak is eradicated.
Quarantine

Quarantine, also known as enforced isolation, is usually effective in decreasing spread.[65][66] Governments often quarantine areas where the disease is occurring or individuals who may be infected.[67] In the United States, the law allows quarantine of those infected with Ebola.[68] During the 2014 outbreak, Liberia closed schools.[69] Those who have been exposed to someone with the disease should be closely observed for 21 days.[70]


WHO is notorious for false flags.

False Flag Alert!- WHO declares H1N1 official flu pandemic
GENEVA — The World Health Organization declared a swine flu pandemic Thursday — the first global flu epidemic in 41 years — as infections in the United States, Europe, Australia, South America and elsewhere climbed to nearly 30,000 cases. The long-awaited pandemic announcement is scientific confirmation that a new flu virus has emerged and is quickly circling the globe. WHO will now ask drugmakers to speed up production of a swine flu vaccine. The declaration will also prompt governments to devote more money toward efforts to contain the virus. WHO chief Dr. Margaret Chan made the announcement Thursday after the U.N. agency held an emergency meeting with flu experts. Chan said she was moving the world to phase 6 — the agency's highest alert level — which means a pandemic, or global epidemic, is under way. "The world is moving into the early days of its first influenza pandemic in the 21st century," Chan told reporters. "The (swine flu) virus is now unstoppable." On Thursday, WHO said 74 countries had reported 28,774 cases of swine flu, including 144 deaths. Chan described the virus as "moderate." According to WHO's pandemic criteria, a global outbreak has begun when a new flu virus begins spreading in two world regions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dG3DTL2tXn8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGLHrrEKOYk