We used to discuss proton decay ...

Might have to take that Guy with a good dose of Sodium Chloride!

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Michio_Kaku

What are women and men? Such a small hormonal change drawn out to exaggerated proportions. It hasn't feared history. I think just how the English language is, there is no good term for mankind, one must use he as not referring to sex but to mankind in totality. In that sense, I think the word history is totally fine unless the English language changes to make a up a gender neutral word. People have tried, but nothing sticks. My own word is digs. Like what is up my digs? it can be both, but saying digs went to the library just sounds like a launch of a first comic trying to invent its own slang. His story I think means he in the sense of man.

But that is not the point of the thread entirely. See, history is written by the winner, haven't you heard that? Most rulers were guys simply because there was a big power struggle. I don't know if it started out sexist in all cases, it could be just a power group of any kind maintaining their control, but the majority turned out that way to be male lead and lofty about it. Witches for example were likely just people, women who were in tune with themselves and aware enough to challenge poor church organization and doctrines. The males felt frightened by the power threat, that their power would be stolen, and so this sensitive and in touch group of women were persecuted. It was an act on the same level as genocide, and likely stunted spiritual growth of not only those lost lives and individuals, but the kids who would have been born with such an aptitude, not to mention that it killed an atmosphere of tolerance in a way that still hasn't been recovered. This is a stain in history.

One history that did feature a prominent role of women was Viking society. There, women often set treaty terms and took offers to the table via men in their lives. Read up on Scandinavian history to see the part women played in their history.

Today, there is still not equal opportunity in science and most of society. With out this, history likely won't have a fairer view. Without religion featuring the female aspects of life, the view people have of the world will be limited and one-sided, missing so many aspects of reality. If you go deep enough, it is not about man or woman, but about the characteristics of both that we share and need to utilize at different points in a natural way of life. But this is not to say that women of history don't need restored and that new pavement shouldn't be trod for greater ease of contribution to the world.
Tyson Degrasse spikes it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inz1sdhsMCU

There was also a group of aboriginals somewhere that was male dominated because they had knowledge that only men could know and that was key to survival of the tribe or people. When the interviewer in the documentary asked the head male, he said if there was anything to know, it had long been lost, it was just that way so that the males weren't forced to be under the women's thumbs and ruled over. I hope people will see that there is no need for such a divide. It is usually an insecurity on the guys side, or a bloke that sees an insecurity which leads to recalls being written by men worried about how they look in the story.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152349469754947&set=a.398595699946.178151.38140379946&type=1&theater

This is weak.

You don't know what he is or is not looking for.

He responds to your comment with an emoticon, and you jump immediately to suggesting he's not interested in a discussion - any discussion - and further suggest that he's looking for men to agree with him.

That is an awful lot of projection.

Maybe he just isn't interested in a discussion with you in particular. Who knows?

IKR?

lol

Edit:



That deserves another 'IKR?'