Holder plays the race card! Then states "Don't go there buddy!" to Sen Gomer during questioning about his contempt charge by congress for failure to provide requested documentation on his Fast & Furious scandal causing the deaths of 2 US Border agents and dozens of Mexican citizens.

He then goes on to state in the video that he and the presidents actions shouldn't be questioned, blaming a racial Repulsicon agenda, rather than the many scandals they find themselves caught in, unwillingness to address or document, as requested by congress, the documents leading to the contempt charges, instead bringing up only the "birther" issue as his/their defense.

But then, 2 liberal black commentators, a liberal black caucus, and the liberal owned MSNBC couldn't be bias could they?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyECKEQ-7xI

MSNBC biased, never, that is just one of those conspiracy theories started by those "Zimmerman" people.

But here is an interesting fact, Under Article I:



Nowhere in the constitution does it extend that proposition to either the executive nor the judiciary. But what was extended to the executive under Article II was:



Now how can the supposed top lawyer in the nation claim not to know this? For the average citizen, ignorance of the law is no excuse but for an attorney or judge, it is downright repugnant according to the supreme court and acts as a determent to the entire legal system. As to the judiciary under Article III:



"Good behavior"? The only questions here are what is good behavior? And just how is it enforced? The answer to both is the "people".

They're not alone in the bias department. Fox is the flip side of that coin, but they do stand alone against the majority of media networks under ownership by liberal controlled corporations, and the VERY liberal movie and entertainment industry.

Sharyl Attkisson: When I'd Begin Getting Under The Surface of an Obama Scandal, CBS Would Pull Me Off

"There is unprecedented, I believe, influence on the media, not just the news, but the images you see everywhere. By well-orchestrated and financed campaign of special interests, political interests and corporations. I think all of that comes into play."

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/sharyl-attkisson-when-id-begin-getting-under-surface-obama-scandal-cbs-would-pull-me

It's not hard for Fox to be #1 when they are the only network with a truly Repulsicon agenda, everyone under one tent.... Fair and Balanced (as long as you agree with them)..... BUT.... the viewers are abandoning the MANY sinking ships of the liberal networks in BIG numbers! Most liberal network ratings are down by 50%, some actually turning to Fox, but more and more seeking alternative media outlets on the internet.

Disney LOVES Obozo! If Tinkerbell ever dies Obozo will assume the role of Disneys' new favorite fairy..... They'll call him Weenie! They already have a puppet called Pinocchio, but he could always be a stand-in if needed!

Fox in general is just the flip side of the liberal coin. But they do like to keep things stirred up to a degree.

But I do like:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgGlFlVVhVQ Judge Napolitano How to get fired from Fox Business in under 5 minutes.

Fox is WAY better than MSNBC which is just a joke.

PMSNBC?

NutcaseNBC!

FAUX is better? LOL

NONE of the anti-Christ media outlets in America are worth a plugged nickel. Many if not most of the anti-Christ media outlets in Europe are not worth a plugged nickel either.

I can see though that practicing the false left/right paradigm and/or divide and conquer tactics are of paramount importance here. To some people.

It's a practice I see right through as though it were glass.

Fox is but a joke from the opposite direction. Still hides all info that the owners don't approve of. They are just to keep the illusion of choice in the politic alive.

But they are all extremely useful to help determine just what is trying to be hidden. It is the alternate media that brings things up along with the mass media that tries to hide those facts that leads the prudent one down the right paths to discover the truth.

But sadly, that is such a little used ability, albeit the current state of affairs and proliferation of idiots indoctrinated in the ways of unthinking.

I ask again, please leave religion out of it. There is another forum for that. Here, suffice to call it "fascist" or "corporate" media please.

I have no qualms with anyone who wishes to believe in or follow a religious teaching, it works for some, but this is a political forum, not a "religious" one.

We are seeing the results of such actions affecting many segments of our culture in bad ways enough already.

Talk about Hobby Lobby or the Little Sisters of Mercy, fine, that's current events, and about 1st amendment rights, but please, don't adulterate the other threads with unrelated ideology others have their 1st amendment right to find offensive.

Religion? Religious? Huh? What?

Oh wait...yeah, I guess Satanism could be considered a "religion". Satanism being the only "religion" practiced by the various media outlets in America.


You mentioned that before on your ...L.A. Sheriff's Deputies Mistakenly Kill Tosh 2.0 Production Assistant...thread, but I didn't understand you.

An "anti-Christ" is an atheist, Sojourning_Soul. "Anti-Christ media" means an atheist media.

Not a "religious media".

Sorry for any confusion.

It is based on religious ideology. It has it's place, I respect that, please respect my right to object to its inference into conversation of which I wish to involve myself.

I was raised the son of a pentecostal missionary. I can probably quote more scripture than most. There is much good to be found there, but that can be said of any ideology/theology/teaching, even satanism.

The hypocrisy is my objection. Few actually live it as they speak it, or it is written.

Being a personal issue, and an inalienable right, guaranteed by our Constitution, I defend its presence in the lives of others, however, I take offense when I have asked to not have it be a part of mine and it is forced upon me to participate in pursuits of my own personal enjoyment..... such as this forum of "current events, news, and politics"

There is a "General Discussion" forum you are more than welcome to start such a thread in, but ask anyone who has been here any length of time..... such threads soon turn ugly, build animosity and are scrubed quite quickly from the forum.

It is TOO personal an issue! THAT is why the founders guaranteed its inherent right by law!

We'll just have to agree to disagree then.

Sometimes I refer to the media as the JMSM.

Trouble is, in this forum here at mingle I have found there is a certain word that one must not ever ever say out loud.

Why?

Because using that word seems to greatly offend those who ARE that particular word, Gnomesayin?

Btw? I live in East Texas. There are more Pentecostals than you can shake a stick at in East Texas and it is THEY who refer to the media as the "AC media".


That's where I got the term from. It's odd to me how you object to it.

Must be a different kind of Pentecostal, I'm thinking.

Yep, we'll agree to disagree, but I will respect your right to not have your threads flagged because of my usage of a NON PC word.

Quote by SS:
There is much good to be found there, but that can be said of any ideology/theology/teaching, even satanism.
==============================================

ORLY?

There is much good to be found in Satanism, eh?

ORLY?

Since I know you're not going to explain that, I won't ask you to.

I won't even go there.

My friend, I have been here many years since the site started as "Just Say Hi". After my accident I forgot my user name and created SS in '09.

I warn you for your own protection, agree or not, be aware of the problems of such inference or topic here.

Many threads have taken that trip to be scrubbed (or worse) due to personal attacks that ALWAYS ensue.

It most often turns into a gunfight before the cowboys leave the corral! One or more are always lookin for a fight!

I wish to avoid that

Argue the issues of 1st amendment rights, policy, politics, whatever ..... but keep it focused on that...... please

That's what happens when one chooses to gamble somewhere...where the deck is stacked against them.

I'm a member of several forums. You wouldn't think it to look at me...but,...My posts, comments, and threads are read by many people all around the world.

Given what I tend to post about; i.e. controversial topics often covered up by the JMSM; I have to admit I am an internationally hated man.

That's ok.

Somebody has to tell the truth.

Used to be if I wasn't called an "anti-semite" 50 times a day; then that was a slow day for me. LOL

Some people have no appreciation for the truth; the truth messes up their propaganda too much.

They HATE me for that. LOLOL

I agree with many if not most of your opinions to varying degrees. You get it! Excellent! But the best message is one that says something to everyone, not just those who already agree with you.

Quote by Sojourning_Soul:
I agree with many if not most of your opinions to varying degrees. You get it! Excellent! But the best message is one that says something to everyone, not just those who already agree with you.
=================================

Often times, a certain segment of society isn't going to agree with me anyway.

Why?

Because they literally CAN'T. They're not allowed to.

Here we are touching on religion again, but have you ever heard of the Talmudic Law of Moser?

Moser = Informer

It's basically the Law of the Informer.

Believe it or not; members of a certain Abrahamic "religion"; i.e. Talmudists; are PROHIBITED by a certain law in their Talmud; to "inform" on their fellow Talmudists to a non Talmudist.

Just a simple agreement on nearly any issue constitutes "informing" and that person would be shunned thereafter.

If not beaten...or, worse.