100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: Odumbocare Before Supreme Court Again | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
alnewman
on
Thu 03/27/14 10:57 AM
|
|
or should that be still. In this instance it is Hobby Lobby vs the dumb bimbo in charge of Odumbocare.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in the ongoing battle over the new health care law’s contraceptive mandate, with the majority of the justices reportedly expressing skepticism over the White House’s decision not to accommodate for-profit companies with religious qualms over the requirement. The majority of the justices questioned, in particular, the Obama administration’s contention that companies and corporations do not hold or retain religious rights in the eyes of the federal government, Politico reported. Maybe some god fearing corporations can stop this madness. Read the whole thing: Early Reports Are Pointing to Some Very Good News for Hobby Lobby in Supreme Court Contraception Case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have no god fearing corporations in action. We also don't put parties into power that give anything else other than "pro provider" systems, not "pro people" systems for healthcare.
Getting something functional for the people will not come from parties that keep reaganomics, vote pro corporate, vote for rights losses, keep lobbyists, keep the FED, keep up an agenda of warfare/meddling for exploitable resources. http://www.gp.org/committees/platform/2010/social-justice.php#999378 and just in case it comes up... http://www.gp.org/committees/platform/2010/economic-justice.php#245108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have no god fearing corporations in action. We also don't put parties into power that give anything else other than "pro provider" systems, not "pro people" systems for healthcare. Getting something functional for the people will not come from parties that keep reaganomics, vote pro corporate, vote for rights losses, keep lobbyists, keep the FED, keep up an agenda of warfare/meddling for exploitable resources. http://www.gp.org/committees/platform/2010/social-justice.php#999378 and just in case it comes up... http://www.gp.org/committees/platform/2010/economic-justice.php#245108 Man,you really have to forget your quasi-Socialism and start fresh! A Corporation is in business to make money for it's Investors,not perpetuating some altruist/Socialist Policies! You want to have the Cake and eat it too,but that is physically impossible! Stop dreaming about some "Benevolent" Sovietsystem! It would be built on Blood like all those other Utopias! Starnesville is the final destination! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have no god fearing corporations in action. We also don't put parties into power that give anything else other than "pro provider" systems, not "pro people" systems for healthcare. Getting something functional for the people will not come from parties that keep reaganomics, vote pro corporate, vote for rights losses, keep lobbyists, keep the FED, keep up an agenda of warfare/meddling for exploitable resources. http://www.gp.org/committees/platform/2010/social-justice.php#999378 and just in case it comes up... http://www.gp.org/committees/platform/2010/economic-justice.php#245108 Read much? Definitely not the article of the OP. And just what makes you think an intelligent person with any semblance of critical thinking skills would want to surrender one form of socialism for another? An intelligent being would be inclined to want and shake them all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Man,you really have to forget your quasi-Socialism and start fresh! A Corporation is in business to make money for it's Investors,not perpetuating some altruist/Socialist Policies! You want to have the Cake and eat it too,but that is physically impossible! Stop dreaming about some "Benevolent" Sovietsystem! It would be built on Blood like all those other Utopias! Starnesville is the final destination! Speaking of Starnsville, I just watched Ayn Rand on Donahue in 1979. I loved it when she called at that bimbo that believed but was educated. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3u8Jjth81_Q |
|
|
|
|
