Thank you alnewman!!!

And I am tempted to check out each and every volume and place it in the sewer.

So.... When the sewer system backs up, people will ask. Why is it back up? Answer, same reason the court system is backed up, just a load of crap.

alnewman..... You're my kind of American.

The most useless American is a conformist. I don't think alnewman is a conformist.

Actually the correct question is what rights were instilled, or an even more basic question, what is a right and what does the constitution have to do with it?

Well... since the courts took the unconstitutional action of judicial review does it really matter anymore what rights were instilled?

Our rights are revised and usurped by the courts at their whim..

Political appointees with no recourse for expulsion..

Sir, if you were to fully understand your rights you would recognize them for what they actually are, pure works of fiction that do not apply to you. And you can not check books out of a law library, they are there for reference with a good copy machine to duplicate what you need to build your case.

As to the first part, let me explain a right. It is inherent into all men, instilled by their creator all the way back to the invention of time. A right was a right before any government was ever considered must less constituted.

So what rights do you have? Any little thing you desire right up to the border of interfering with the rights of another.

And then there are the pris juris court systems. But that would require days to explain so let me leave it at this. By what authority do those mythical beings have to do what they do? I would submit the pure idiocy of those that stand before them. To fully understand this statement would require a lot of study on the part of the people.

And last but not least, lawyers, those professional leeches that get rich on the stupidity of the public at large. But there is one thing that scares the bejesus out of the intelligent ones, an individual that knows the law and has no commitment to that private union that controls our nation in violation of the constitution both in separation of powers and titles of nobility. Now I say intelligent ones because the stupid ones never catch on all the way to their legal demise.

.. is this country doomed..hmm. I think you need to broaden your scope a bit.. maybe a bigger bigger picture..lol

.I think that's about the size of it.. Yeah that's big enough good. Lol lol is this country .doomed...you spring a leak in your boat.. You don't worry about the leak.. you worry about saving.the boat..come on people really..

Ahh, but I am a conformist, I conform to the belief of free men. Men over government, government is but my servant.

I conform, to the constitution that founded this government and I am committed to return it to the contract as written.

As a result I have spent the past four years studying law and I am having the time of my life.

And that has been pretty obvious from the substance of your replies.

If an adult has a RIGHT to participate in sexting with a child because the child can delete or ignore the text....then is it acceptable to take sexual advantage of a mentally ill person who agrees to have sex?

The mental capacity of a person, whether it's maturity or metal illness, should be taken into consideration when determining the what is actually a right. If a child was exposed to sexually explicit language by a parent that child would be removed from the home even if the child participated in the same type of language.
The parent would be charged with abusing a minor, the parents right to freedom of speech wouldn't be a defense....sexting with a child should be treated the same way.

Save the boat? I would prefer to let it and all the little termites sink. I'll swim to shore and build a new boat out of a wood not so susceptible to termites.

time to start getting the shoe mounted camera's out!

Any (PROVEN, BEYOND A DOUBT) perverse act aimed at children should be automatic life or death.

Adult females, cover yourselves if ya don't want to attract that sort of attention.

And just how would that be a right? It isn't!!! That is a violation of a parents rights, the rights of their children not to be molested.

This is one of the main problems of this country, nobody understands basic rights but they feel to be the judge of another in the removal of the rights of other people.

But the good news, rights are unalienable and can't be removed, only enslaved.

Ah, trespass upon the person, penalty could be death determined by a jury of his peers.

and how do you come about that conclusion in regards to it being a violation of the parent's rights based on a literal interpretation of the first amendment?

And what would the amendments have to do with it? The amendments bestow no rights what so ever. To those that depend on the amendments for rights have no rights, their rights have been enslaved and at best are subject to the 14th Amendment for their privileges.

I meant a mentally ill adult, not a mentally ill child, agreeing to have sex. I should have been more specific. But it doesn't change the fact that taking advantage of an individual, through speech or physical contact, who doesn't have the reasoning ability of a rational mature adult is wrong and is abuse. Abusing anyone isn't a right, regardless of the method.

If the amendments dont matter then why did they bother including article V?

I wont disagree with that.