Liberals will always shoot the messenger as well as ignoring the message..... even if it is important or shared by the many.

Obozocare is a prime example

i'm so amazed how liberals can't see barry for what he is... they had no problem calling out bush, and barry is 37 times worse than bush, and yet they won't see any of it....

I know right. I knew Obama was more of the same when he let those criminals off for war crimes. What we have is more of the same with the exception that Obama does not openly declare war on the middle class as Bush and Cheney and all republicans do.

The first thing Obama should have pushed for was the elimination of the patriot act, that is the tool they use to bludgeon us with while creating a global police state.

i don't agree with you much, but i do agree with you here... the PA should have been abolished a long time ago...

Its pretty much a given our next Potus will be a Dem due to the total wacked out nature of the republicans. Lets just hope its not Hillary. It would be another repeat.

back to reality now... no, barry has sucked as bad/worse than GW did... no telling who will win, because they all suck right now...

Best for President in 2016!

I hope Ross Perot resurfaces.

Wasn't the abolition of the Patriot-Act one of Obama's promises?


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/earl-ofari-hutchinson/did-obama-break-his-campa_b_288112.html

Then-Senatorial candidate Obama in 2003 branded the Patriot Act "shoddy and dangerous" and pledged to dump it. He made the pledge in response to a candidate's survey by the National Organization for Women. Obama reneged on the pledge. But he did work to shave off some of the more blatantly outrageous constitutional abuses in the Act by imposing some civil liberties protections in the gathering and use of intelligence, on the use of torture in interrogations, and requiring at least some semblance of due process in court proceedings. But that paled in significance when Obama in a letter and with little fanfare and comment routinely let stand most of the still noxious provisions in the Act.

Business and citizens groups can still have their records examined by the government with minimal checks on how the information can be used and more particularly used against. Individuals often based on flimsiest of evidence can still be targeted for monitoring and surveillance if suspected of being a potential terrorist. Organizations and individuals can still be slapped with so-called roving wiretaps (taps that can be placed on an individual or group anywhere, anytime) again based on the flimsiest evidence or suspicion.

The other provisions in the Act that are just as legally questionable and constitutionally suspect are still firmly in place. Obama has given no hint that he'll change them.

The best known and most controversial is the executive order that grants wide latitude loosely defining what and who is a "terrorist combatant," where and how long that individual can be held (indefinitely) and how they should be legally disposed of (none of the standard constitutional protections).

yep,some day you might even elect the right Candidate!
Like,"The Next Right Candidate"!
Keep on dreaming!

Judge Nap and Mike Lee..... makes sense, will never happen

Judge Nap has the knowledge and qualifications to be POTUS, and Mike Lee as VP could learn much and eventually become a great POTUS after serving as a VP under him

Mike Lee has the best Constitutional voting record in Congress

Soros will spread around a Billion Dollars if necessary to get his Candidate into the WH!

You forgot his buddies Bloomberg and Buffet, but then you have the Rockefellers and Bushes, Gates and Addlesons on the other side.

People let money decide their vote, then they biotch when their vote tends to favor money when in power....

Idiot voters!