1 2 3 5 Next
Topic: SPECIAL POLICE OFFICER BULLETIN
no photo
Thu 01/16/14 07:34 PM



http://inspirationalstorytellers.com/the-elephant-and-the-rope/
The Elephant and the Rope

There is a story about a man who, as he was passing some elephants, suddenly stopped, confused by the fact that these huge creatures were being held by only a small rope tied to their front leg. No chains, no cages. It was obvious that the elephants could, at anytime, break away from their bonds but for some reason, they did not.



He saw a trainer nearby and asked why these animals just stood there and made no attempt to get away. Well, the trainer said, when they are very young and much smaller we use the same size rope to tie them and, at that age, it's enough to hold them. As they grow up, they are conditioned to believe they cannot break away. They believe the rope can still hold them, so they never try to break free.



The man was amazed. These animals could at any time break free from their bonds but because they believed they couldn't, they were stuck right where they were.



Yeah that does describe some here.

no photo
Thu 01/16/14 07:37 PM





yes,

ones right to 'drive a car' ends with anothers 'right to pursue life' by not being KILLED due to the drivers incompetence or incapability


its no infringement for others to 'travel',, but it is an infringement for the impaired or incapacitated or unknowledgable (of street directions and driving rules) to be DRIVING VEHICLES,,,



You are clueless!

How does operating a vehicle without a license or registration make a person a bad driver or risk to others?

Perhaps we should all drive tanks!

I didn't say anything about disobeying the rules of the road. Those are offenses you can be stopped and charged for.

We are talking about owning and operating, not breaking the law.



its a risk to others if there is no verification that one knows how to drive,,,,

its an issue of public safety, the 'right' for those of us in the public to continue to pursue life and happiness by feeling safe on the roads,, to require (Test) that people actually know HOW TO DRIVE Before driving,,,


Driving is as common as a TV anymore. Kids are put on the streets with "permits" laugh not knowing how to drive every day.... do we ban them too? You just like being coddled and paid, told what to do, what's right, what's wrong.

Sad life. A slave mentality. Things never change when a culture is adopted/adapted thru propaganda and programming. Those that fight it and want something better are the ones you call crazy. The Sons of Liberty had to overcome a whole slew of people who thought like you before they ever fought the crown for our independence. Those who believe as you will cause it to happen again!

You've been well trained. Not so educated.

I kind of like using my brain, self accomplishments, freedom and the liberty of actually enjoying something, rather than a leader who tells me I didn't build it, a corrupt govt that tells me I can't do it, and then takes away my abilities to do so thru unlawful/unconstitutional regulation and law.


people need to learn to drive, it is incumbent that the licensed driver is held responsible while they are in the car, permits are for six months, not for a lifetime, and MOST Drivers on the roads have licenses and not permits,,


now, whether they USE what they learned well is another question, and YES when they break the laws of the road, even after passing a test, they should have legal consequence,, which they do

unfortunately, I am not permitted to respond to personal insults and attacks, so I will skip my response to those,,,,and the ASSumptions about what I like

I Don't assume that I have the right to do whatever makes me happy though, that's for sure,,,,I Take into account how actions affect others and how actions EN MASSE would affect things as well

I Am doing the things I 'want' to do, I just do them legally

no one prevents me from doing the legally either,


a society of no law would be a chaotic one,, as well as one where everyone just did whatever made them 'happy'


if MAN Created it, man controls it,, that's life,,,,

those things man create usually take funds to do so and require revenue and resources,, also life

and I may want to toss a piece of gum on the road, and it not 'harm' anyone, but if everyone is able to do it in their 'pursuit of happiness', it may lead to the unhappiness of many others who aren't happy looking at it


there are a lot of things in life like that where 'happiness' isn't so simple when it affects the 'happiness' of others,, this is one of those cases


its not intelligent, in my opinion, to hand just anyone a gun or to just allow anyone behind a ton of metal that can move at speeds up to 100mph,, it would impede on my 'happiness' to worry about my safety in a society where that was the accepted norm,,,,


as a citizen, Im sure my 'happiness' should be no more or less an issue than anyone elses ,,,laugh



The definition of a slave to be sure.

no photo
Thu 01/16/14 07:38 PM




You want your rights but wish to infringe on or limit those of others

(kind of like those who wish to have the 'right' to happiness by allowing unskilled drivers access to cars, while infringing upon the 'right' to life of those put in danger by such a 'right')




Aren't you glad soldiers will fight and die defending them for you..... so you don't have to.

(what soldiers fight for is personal to the soldier isn't it? many do it because it is a job, many never planned to do it,,,soldiers aren't all the same in their motivations,, and when is the last time a soldier died defending my 'rights'? what war have we been in in the last 50 years that had to do with those?)


So how do you show them thanks? By giving them away or allowing them to be abused or taken in your ignorance


I Show them respect by thanking them, the same way I Thank teachers when I See them, or doctors when I See them, or firefighters, or police officers,,etc,,


,,plenty of people with important jobs that I Respect,, and when I See them, I Tell them thanks PERSONALLY







Excuses, excuses but no real substance.

no photo
Thu 01/16/14 07:40 PM

whoa relevance?

did someone provide statistics in this thread? Anyone?

opinions,, opinions and more opinions,, everyone is entitled,,,


Yeah, one side of this argument is pure opinion and an incorrect one at that.

no photo
Thu 01/16/14 07:49 PM

to travel is to move from one place to another, which we have a God given 'right' to do all day long

however, we were never bestowed by God a 'right to drive'



it is not constitutional right, to drive a car , only to TRAVEL,,,,


First, there are no constitutional rights, never has been, never will be.

Second, I have a right to do anything I please, I'm not a citizen under the 14th Amendment and have not traded any rights for privileges. I do have a drivers license because I operate commercial vehicles, but that will end in 6 months and I will surrender my license and rescind any inherent contract.

Thirdly, when I am in my personal vehicle, I am traveling and will call an officer to task if he impedes my rights. I love messing with traffic magistrates, you could say a lot more entertaining than the idiot boxes most are glued to. They totally understand the concept of a Writ of Quo Warranto and want me out of their presence as quickly as possible. And lo and behold the one that doesn't understand but most are quickly corrected by the head magistrate.

Someday, you may have a clue but not this time.

no photo
Thu 01/16/14 07:58 PM
Edited by alnewman on Thu 01/16/14 07:58 PM





because there are laws ABOUT an activity doesnt mean there is a law giving a RIGHT to that activity,, so the point is not invalid at all


there are minimum wage laws, but minimum wage is not a RIGHT, it changes,, rights do NOT

an obsession with arguing for the sake of arguing leads to constant distractions,,,


oh good grief, for the sake of avoiding more nitpicking and back and forth, in the context of THIS discussion, I am and have been debating 'natural rights',, as opposed to 'legal rights'



one never changes, the other does,,,

I just realized the 'ammo' provided to those who just revel in arguing and belittling by not being more specific as to the original CONTEXT of my statements,,,





But you are understanding neither so all is mute. First, there is lawful and then there is legal. Both apply to you but only lawful applies to me. You are bound by the 14th Amendment and I am bound by nothing. You are a citizen with privileges, I am a people with rights.

Until you understand these basic principles, you haven't a clue of what you are talking about, just pure rhetoric, conjecture and innuendo.

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

no photo
Thu 01/16/14 08:02 PM





Laws have NOTHING to do with Rights!
Rights are not given by Laws!
Rights are inherent in People!
Read your Bill Of Rights!



how can there be an 'inherent' right to drive when cars don't occur naturally?....

the creator didn't give us cars, so how could God have given us the 'right' to drive a car,,,

smh

now, 'traveling' is something people have done long before cars that can be said to be 'inherent' as a right



Total bull, no basis in reality for any of the statements in reply to laws and rights. The first quote is correct in every aspect except for rights are laws.



the first quote states rights are inherent in people


for it to be inherent in people it would have to be inherent in the FIRST PEOPLE

therefore, driving a car is not INHERENT IN PEOPLE,, although traveling (moving from place to place) is


Your statement is a contradiction unto itself and therefore is totally invalid, in every concept.

no photo
Thu 01/16/14 08:05 PM




How unbelievable
so pursuit of happiness should be interpreted as 'whatever pleases us is our right?

rofl rofl rofl



At last a true statement within limits.



and isnt it those 'limits' that people dont agree on?

who gets to decide those?


If you do not know the limits, you do not understand rights. But then, you are very comfortable with privileges, another concept you are having trouble understanding. But I can help there, take what you understand as rights and relabel it privileges and you will understand one principle at least.

1 2 3 5 Next