100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: Sandy Hook Cover-up in full swing... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
If the Connecticut General Assembly is successful, we will never know details of what happened at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown on December 14, 2012.
Bill drafting in secret to hide Sandy Hook records The Hartford Courant is reporting that the Connecticut governor’s office is working in secret with General Assembly leaders to create a bill that would withhold records related to the police investigation of the Newtown elementary school massacre. Victim photos and tape recordings of 911 calls could all become impossible to obtain or any reason. “There is complete agreement regarding photos etc., and audio tapes, although the act may allow the disclosure of audio transcripts,” a assistant to the Chief State Attorney, Timothy J. Sugrue, told the Hartford Courant. The bill hasn’t come out from behind close doors as of yet. There has been no committee review nor has it gone through any routine legislative proceedure. Gubernatorial chief of staff Mark Ojakian said in a statement, “A lot of people, including our office, have heard the concerns expressed by the families of Newtown victims, and are exploring ways to respect the families’ right to privacy while also respecting the public’s right to information”. The real question now is, why would such information want be to withheld? Is there any legitimate reason for the state to hold the information from the investigation in secrecy? Right after the shooting happened questions immediately rose about how truthful the narrative coming from the state of Connecticut and the popular media really was. The questioning even drove Connecticut police to release a statement saying only the information coming from them was accurate and anyone information coming from else where should be ignored. Its hard to see this as anything but a cover up due to its lack of sensibility. This bill and those involved should be added to the investigative information as possible suspects of a cover up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who was the suspect, found in the woods, wearing cammo, sitting in the front seat of a cruiser, let go only after a short questioning?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the Connecticut General Assembly is successful, we will never know details of what happened at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown on December 14, 2012. Bill drafting in secret to hide Sandy Hook records The Hartford Courant is reporting that the Connecticut governor’s office is working in secret with General Assembly leaders to create a bill that would withhold records related to the police investigation of the Newtown elementary school massacre. Victim photos and tape recordings of 911 calls could all become impossible to obtain or any reason. “There is complete agreement regarding photos etc., and audio tapes, although the act may allow the disclosure of audio transcripts,” a assistant to the Chief State Attorney, Timothy J. Sugrue, told the Hartford Courant. The bill hasn’t come out from behind close doors as of yet. There has been no committee review nor has it gone through any routine legislative proceedure. Gubernatorial chief of staff Mark Ojakian said in a statement, “A lot of people, including our office, have heard the concerns expressed by the families of Newtown victims, and are exploring ways to respect the families’ right to privacy while also respecting the public’s right to information”. The real question now is, why would such information want be to withheld? Is there any legitimate reason for the state to hold the information from the investigation in secrecy? Right after the shooting happened questions immediately rose about how truthful the narrative coming from the state of Connecticut and the popular media really was. The questioning even drove Connecticut police to release a statement saying only the information coming from them was accurate and anyone information coming from else where should be ignored. Its hard to see this as anything but a cover up due to its lack of sensibility. This bill and those involved should be added to the investigative information as possible suspects of a cover up. So, what is the source of the OP? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is an excerpt from a post published at http://courantblogs.com/capitol-watch
Gov. Dannel P. Malloy Friday defended a secretly drafted bill that would block public disclosure of some of the records compiled in the investigation of the Dec. 14 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown. . .
Malloy said he supports the legislation, which hasn’t yet come to a vote, because the massacre was “a terrible thing” and there’s been “a lot of wacky coverage in the block world. … And, you know, listen, I’m going to stand with the parents. I want to protect them. I don’t think these pictures should be released, and I’m with them.”Police departments never release grisly crime-scene photos under existing law; they only become part of the public record if introduced as evidence in a trial, and generally are not published by news organizations even then. . . Malloy said that a reporter who asked about the disparity issue “wants to widen it” to cover non-Newtown cases, and “we’re trying to keep it as narrow as possible with respect to the hellacious events of Dec. 14 in Newtown.”He was asked if carving out Newtown from normal freedom of information procedures would feed the paranoia of so-called “truthers” who have made Internet videos suggesting that law enforcement authorities have hidden the truth about the massacre. He responded: “They’re nuts anyway, OK?” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "source" is the Internet. I found several articles.
The cover-up is not about the grizzly photos. They want to suppress all information about the crime. Why? What are they covering up? If they have nothing to hide and if this was not some black flag exercise of terrorism with an agenda and if all they are telling us is the truth, what is there to cover up? And yes... WHO WAS THE GUY THEY CHASED INTO THE WOODS? OR WERE THERE TWO GUYS? We want THE ANSWERS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "source" is the Internet. I found several articles. Then post the URL to the article that that is quoted in the OP. They want to suppress all information about the crime.
Nonsense. That is not what is being proposed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "source" is the Internet. I found several articles. Then post the URL to the article that that is quoted in the OP. They want to suppress all information about the crime.
Nonsense. That is not what is being proposed. FYI If you want to know the exact source of anything posted all you have to do is copy a sentence or two from the post and google it. There are quite a number of Internet sources quoting the same information. I don't think the "source" of the information is important. What is being done and said is that they want to (again) "protect" the families and their privacy. I say bull crap and double bull crap. They want to protect and control completely the flow of public information and they want to pick and choose what is released. The idiot law enforcement even wanted to arrest anyone who questioned their story and posted anything different from their story. He wanted to suppress FREE SPEECH, AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION. That alone demonstrates their mentality. There is something being hidden and covered up about that incident. The public is sick of being lied to and sick of the propaganda and bull crap. We are also sick of being told we can't ask questions or publish information that contradicts the official report. Now who the hell did they chase into the woods, and who did they have locked up in a police car and why? Why can't we get a strait answer to our questions? |
|
|
|
|
