Community > Dating & Relationships

Topic: question for the ladies
ridewytepony Joined Sun 04/14/13 Posts: 3697	Sun 05/19/13 06:33 PM
Huh? Pulling the foreskin back is an inconvenience? What does that even mean? Anywayit happens automatically and doesn't need any "pulling back", so I think that the mistake you are making there is thinking that it's something that you need to do so a guy can get it up. No, I wouldn't get a circumcision and studies show that sex is better if the guy has a foreskin. ..lol..your hilarious! Thats to funny you couldn't be serious could you. Maybee its a trick that helps perk some guys up for round two quicker than a sensual slow hand.. Circumcision was brought in through the Catholics to stop self-abuse It did help! as i'm :pitchfork down to three times a day now So it was to take away the stipulation, be a deterrent.

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Sun 05/19/13 06:42 PM
I prefer circumsized,,,, but no one physical factor makes or breaks it once love is involved,,,except for gender,age, and relation, for me I honestly would skip over the uncircumsized if known in advance though, just for the sheer inconvenience and my experience being satisfying already with just circumsized partners,,, How is him being uncircumcised an inconvenience for you? pulling the foreskin back,,,of course he could do it too,, but Id rather skip it all together,, given the choice,,, LOL! That is an inconvenience for you? Damn.

ashryn Joined Sat 03/12/11 Posts: 383	Sun 05/19/13 07:45 PM Edited by ashryn on Sun 05/19/13 07:50 PM
no preference...i've been with a guy who was and a guy who wasn't...both were great! as for the pulling down the foreskin...never had to pull anything...it pretty much popped out on its own

sweetestgirl11 Joined Fri 09/12/08 Posts: 30087	Sun 05/19/13 08:17 PM
no I can't imagine having the time or inclination to be the least bit concerned it functions either way

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Sun 05/19/13 08:27 PM
no I can't imagine having the time or inclination to be the least bit concerned it functions either way Seriously. It isn't a big deal. I think some people worry about cleanliness, but if he knows how to clean himself (which is a basic thing he should have learned at a young age), there won't be an issue.

sweetestgirl11 Joined Fri 09/12/08 Posts: 30087	Sun 05/19/13 08:32 PM Edited by sweetestgirl11 on Sun 05/19/13 08:32 PM
no I can't imagine having the time or inclination to be the least bit concerned it functions either way Seriously. It isn't a big deal. I think some people worry about cleanliness, but if he knows how to clean himself (which is a basic thing he should have learned at a young age), there won't be an issue. one can always offer instructional services I agree. not an issue either way (the instructional services part could be fun)

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Sun 05/19/13 08:36 PM
If I have to teach a guy how to clean himself, there's a big problem.

mg1959 Joined Thu 04/05/07 Posts: 7872	Sun 05/19/13 09:00 PM
I'm traveling so I can't, but I'm waiting for someone to post the picture of Peter Sellers standing in front of the fan in "the pink panther".

suzzy888 Joined Mon 05/06/13 Posts: 1	Sun 05/19/13 10:52 PM
Everyone afraid to tell ya eh. Its ok if hes not cut as long as hes a clean guy because stuff can be brewing under that skin. Guys are more sensitive so maby its better for him. For me its not as good as a cut one and i would give a better blow job to a cut one too. Much cleaner and sexy. But its not a deal breaker if i really like the guy. I had a friend who got it done and thought it was great and felt better with the girls. Each their own though.

TawtStrat Joined Fri 11/16/12 Posts: 3581	Mon 05/20/13 03:41 AM
Huh? Pulling the foreskin back is an inconvenience? What does that even mean? Anywayit happens automatically and doesn't need any "pulling back", so I think that the mistake you are making there is thinking that it's something that you need to do so a guy can get it up. No, I wouldn't get a circumcision and studies show that sex is better if the guy has a foreskin. ..lol..your hilarious! Thats to funny you couldn't be serious could you. Maybee its a trick that helps perk some guys up for round two quicker than a sensual slow hand.. Circumcision was brought in through the Catholics to stop self-abuse It did help! as i'm :pitchfork down to three times a day now So it was to take away the stipulation, be a deterrent. Yes, I'm serious, it acts like a seal and helps to keep the vagina lubricated. This means that you can get more hours of fun before she starts to tell you that she's getting sore and wants you to stop.

hurricanelover1 Joined Tue 05/14/13 Posts: 2	Mon 05/20/13 04:35 AM
Well let me say this, being uncut is not a problem me, the ladies have giving me blow job and never thought nothing of it, they day i have a pretty Dickand head be red *** a cherry, people just not use to men being uncut,i am and i keep my self clean and you don't have to pull no skin back because when it get hard your head come out by itself

foundibtc Joined Sun 05/19/13 Posts: 1	Mon 05/20/13 08:02 AM
I was married to a man that was not, I had no problem with it. You just have to keep it clean, which means you must pull the skin back when you are in the shower and clean it. This also means after intercourse. I think it all comes down to personal preferance.