100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: IF YOU ARE MASTER MIND THEN PROOF IT..... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
what of this one guys.............. 2.3 + 2.3 = 4.6 2.3 rounds down to 2 2.3 rounds down to 2 again 4.6 rounds up to 5 therefore 2+2=5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't khow what it effect on people. But we khow that it is my work it take a loss of period of time then it comes. And it is correct that's the proof of 2 2=5. It is also based on all rule of mathamatics. Thank you have a nice day. . By. SHESH NATH . HERE THIS LESSION OF MINGLE IS END. No, the alleged "proof" is based on errors. Let we take a value, 20=20 applying -ve sin on both sides, -20=-20 or, 16-36=25-45 adding (9\2)^2 on both sides we get, 4^2 + (9\2)^2-36 =5^2 + (9\2)^2-45 Stop. Let's re-write that last equation. 4-squared - 36 + (9/2) squared = 5 squared - 45 + (9/2) squared. Now, what is 9/2? Answer: 4.5. What is 4.5 squared? Answer: 20.25. which is formula of (a-b)^2,
No, it isn't. This is where the alleged "proof" starts to go wrong. then we can get (4-(9\2))^2=(5-(9\2))^2
Another way of writing that last equation is (4-4.5)squared = (5-4.5)squared or (-0.5)squared = (0.5)squared now taking root on both sides we get,
4-(9\2)=5-(9\2) Wrong again. 4-(9/2) does not equal 5-(9/2) 4-(9/2)= -0.5 5-(9/2)= 0.5 since here in both sides (9\2) then it is cancel out and then we can written as,
2 + 2=5 proved. You can't cancel out the (9/2) on both sides because 4-(9/2) does not equal 5-(9/2). The only way that you get 2+2=5 is by making a mathematical error. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't khow what it effect on people. But we khow that it is my work it take a loss of period of time then it comes. And it is correct that's the proof of 2 2=5. It is also based on all rule of mathamatics. Thank you have a nice day. . By. SHESH NATH . HERE THIS LESSION OF MINGLE IS END. No, the alleged "proof" is based on errors. Let we take a value, 20=20 applying -ve sin on both sides, -20=-20 or, 16-36=25-45 adding (9\2)^2 on both sides we get, 4^2 + (9\2)^2-36 =5^2 + (9\2)^2-45 Stop. Let's re-write that last equation. 4-squared - 36 + (9/2) squared = 5 squared - 45 + (9/2) squared. Now, what is 9/2? Answer: 4.5. What is 4.5 squared? Answer: 20.25. which is formula of (a-b)^2,
No, it isn't. This is where the alleged "proof" starts to go wrong. then we can get (4-(9\2))^2=(5-(9\2))^2
Another way of writing that last equation is (4-4.5)squared = (5-4.5)squared or (-0.5)squared = (0.5)squared now taking root on both sides we get,
4-(9\2)=5-(9\2) Wrong again. 4-(9/2) does not equal 5-(9/2) 4-(9/2)= -0.5 5-(9/2)= 0.5 since here in both sides (9\2) then it is cancel out and then we can written as,
2 + 2=5 proved. You can't cancel out the (9/2) on both sides because 4-(9/2) does not equal 5-(9/2). The only way that you get 2+2=5 is by making a mathematical error. Yep! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not really. However there are false proofs of untrue mathematical statements, based on false assumptions or faulty reasoning.
For example, below is a 'proof' that 1=0 (http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=1006051531250) If you can prove that 1=0, then you can prove that 2+2=5, or indeed that practically anything equals anything else. Can you spot the fallacy? Let a & b each be equal to 1. Since a ^ b are equal, b^2 = ab (eq.1) Since a equals itself, it is obvious that a^2 = a^2 (eq.2) Subtract equation 1 from equation 2. (a^2) - (b^2) = (a^2)-ab (eq. 3) We can factor both sides of the equation: (a^2)-ab equals a(a-b). Likewise, (a^2)-(b^2) equals (a + b)(a - b) (Nothing fishy is going on here. This statement is perfectly true. Plug in numbers and see for yourself!) Substituting into the equation 3, we get (a+b)(a-b) = a (a-b) So far, so good. Now divide both sides of the equation by (a-b) and we get a + b = a b = 0 But we set b to 1 at the very beginning of this proof, so this means that 1 = 0 Read more: Is it possible to prove that 2+2=5? | Answerbag http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/471599#ixzz2Qe9fpgyf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
numbers don't phase me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
numbers don't phase me. What if they are numbers on your pay check? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not really. However there are false proofs of untrue mathematical statements, based on false assumptions or faulty reasoning. For example, below is a 'proof' that 1=0 (http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=1006051531250) If you can prove that 1=0, then you can prove that 2+2=5, or indeed that practically anything equals anything else. Can you spot the fallacy? Let a & b each be equal to 1. Since a ^ b are equal, b^2 = ab (eq.1) Since a equals itself, it is obvious that a^2 = a^2 (eq.2) Subtract equation 1 from equation 2. (a^2) - (b^2) = (a^2)-ab (eq. 3) We can factor both sides of the equation: (a^2)-ab equals a(a-b). Likewise, (a^2)-(b^2) equals (a + b)(a - b) (Nothing fishy is going on here. This statement is perfectly true. Plug in numbers and see for yourself!) Substituting into the equation 3, we get (a+b)(a-b) = a (a-b) So far, so good. Now divide both sides of the equation by (a-b) and we get a + b = a b = 0 But we set b to 1 at the very beginning of this proof, so this means that 1 = 0 Read more: Is it possible to prove that 2+2=5? | Answerbag http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/471599#ixzz2Qe9fpgyf you are all ri8. It is correct in the same way as, 'where a lot of true is found, where a little false also found.' or ''Har sahi chez me ek galat chez bhi hota hai.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2+2=5
1(2+2)=(2.2)+1 1(4)-(4)=1 1=1 »quite possible. Haha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2+2=5 1(2+2)=(2.2)+1 1(4)-(4)=1 1=1 »quite possible. Haha I thought that Filipina hamsters were too busy eating chocolate to do math tricks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2+2=5 1(2+2)=(2.2)+1 1(4)-(4)=1 1=1 »quite possible. Haha I thought that Filipina hamsters were too busy eating chocolate to do math tricks. Haha i dont know how i come up to that. I hate math but i found trigo and proving interesting too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2+2=5 1(2+2)=(2.2)+1 1(4)-(4)=1 1=1 »quite possible. Haha Second line is incorrect, once again, math errors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2+2=5 1(2+2)=(2.2)+1 1(4)-(4)=1 1=1 »quite possible. Haha Second line is incorrect, once again, math errors. Are you trying to spoil the little hamster's fun?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why yes, yes I am.
It's tit for tat (because she's too young for me is her crime). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why yes, yes I am.
It's tit for tat (because she's too young for me is her crime). But she is so adorable. Bad at math, but adorable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why yes, yes I am.
It's tit for tat (because she's too young for me is her crime). But she is so adorable. Bad at math, but adorable. If she would post a bikini picture I could sigh over, all would be forgiven.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you're willing to accept in any way, shape, or form. that 2+2=5
Then I propose this, I'll sell you four items. Then you can pay me for five. When you say "Hey why am I getting charged, For an additional item?" I'll write this equation out for you. 2+2 = 5 That's about as mastermind as this nonsense is going to get. Any Takers? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you're willing to accept in any way, shape, or form. that 2 2=5 Then I propose this, I'll sell you four items. Then you can pay me for five. When you say "Hey why am I getting charged, For an additional item?" I'll write this equation out for you. 2 2 = 5 That's about as mastermind as this nonsense is going to get. Any Takers? it is a mathmatical forms not real, your think is nonsense to get it in real life. The mathematcs rule are not wrong in during proof. You can also see in page of yahoo.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Lord!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you're willing to accept in any way, shape, or form. that 2 2=5 Then I propose this, I'll sell you four items. Then you can pay me for five. When you say "Hey why am I getting charged, For an additional item?" I'll write this equation out for you. 2 2 = 5 That's about as mastermind as this nonsense is going to get. Any Takers? it is a mathmatical forms not real, your think is nonsense to get it in real life. The mathematcs rule are not wrong in during proof. You can also see in page of yahoo.com There is no mathematical proof that 2+2=5. The alleged "proof" is the result of mathematical errors. |
|
|
|
|
