No kidding, you get the feeling that some of these people would jump off a bridge if a "scientist" said you could survive doing so. I mean.......screw the facts right?

Why don't I study? That's your answer for everything. You think you are so much smarter than everyone else because you have a degree in something. Please.

I know what sound is.

I have seen and heard, buildings being demolished in person in Las Vegas. They are not all that loud that the actual explosions can be "heard for miles."

I have heard truck tires blow out on the highway five blocks from my house that shook the whole town that were louder.

Of course the noise level in my town is low compared to what the combined noise level in a big city like New York would be.

Your argument that detonations taking out some columns would be heard for miles is just not true. The noise level in New York at that time was very high. Some people did claim to have heard explosions but all those testimonies were ignored or rationalized away by NIST investigators. They simply omitted all testimony about people who heard explosions.

And you have no idea what kind of explosive charges might have been used. They don't necessarily have to be your garden variety professional demolition explosives. They could have been something altogether different.

Now if and when I see another towering inferno or 40 to 50 story building collapse because of a fire, then I might start to believe its possible.

No one claimed to hear cascading explosions consistent with a demolition. Yes the sound would have been caught on all thw videos where the collapse itself is audible. Yes I have a degree in engineering and know more about science then u

Well as much as you and others think you know, I am still not convinced that a fire can take down a building like that.

And your conclusions still do not explain why all testimony about any explosions being heard were ignored and left out of the 9-11 commission report, either.

Neither am I convinced that airplanes could take down the twin towers.

Perhaps we should send our engineers and architects to Russia to find out how they are building sky scrapers so much better than ours.

Well its not hard to grasp that people that don't understand things are not convinced by them. Go back in time and try to explain to a Viking that lightning isn't Thor and his hammer and he will feel the same way. It doesn't make it less true.

thats what they said... i'm not real sure why building 7 is so important to the CT'ers anyway, whether they did it intentionally or not, what does it matter? with the damage done to the complex as a whole, that building would have been torn down anyway...

pot-kettle?... you should look up the definition of "fact"

If you had seen the movie you would know what he could do with that hammer!

Not really, I know what the facts are, I could careless what the media may try to spin them as. It's you that needs to learn them, not me.

so what are your facts?

I'll explain it to you then.

1. Building 7 is important because it was not hit by a plane, which is the excuse/cause given for the collapse of the twin towers.

2. Building 7 was not hit by a plane, and it collapsed anyway, and they are claiming that it was not demolished on purpose so now they have to try to convince people that the fire caused the building to fall. (They are not very convincing)

If it had been only the twin towers that fell, it would have been a whole lot easier to successfully sell the story that the reason for the buildings collapse was that they were hit by planes driven by terrorists. BUT building 7, also fell into its footprint in a very neat and professional manner that resembled a controlled demolition and it was NOT HIT BY A PLANE.

So somebody had a lot of splainin' to do.

And they got together all their writers and 'splainers that are on the government payroll and they took a while, but eventually they came up with some explanations that a few people bought lock stock and barrel, but by the time they did that, the conspiracy theorist had over run the Internet.

Clearly the propaganda 'splainers need to be quicker on the draw for any future terrorists events they want to have. They are clearly out gunned by the conspiracy theorists.

People like Jeannie and I have been TRYING to tell you the facts of the matter forever......if you weren't listening before, why should I expect you to listen now? I'm not gonna keep rehashing something just for you to ridicule it, no point in wasting the truth like that.

ok, in that statement, you had 2 actual facts:
Building 7 was not hit by a plane
it collapsed anyway

the rest is mostly observational viewpoints...your looking for reasons to prove them wrong, and skipping the things that could say they're right... critical thinking would be to look at both viewpoints from equal and different angles... i can see where building 7 is a little fishy, but it makes no difference when they tore it down, no life was lost when it fell...

lol... i wouldn't want you to waste the "your" truth on anyone...

yep,and it's you who has the 'splaining to do,since you obviously think Engineers are Buttholes!


This is actually what happened!
But you haven't heard it from me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC

1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
2) inability to quench ground zero heat with water
3) red hot/molten steel at ground zero
4) missing core columns from ground zero (vaporized during destruction)
5) spreading of sand at ground zero consistent with attempts to limit radiation
6) washing of steel recovered from pile consistent with radiation decontamination
7) extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting access to radioactive steel
8) extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation
9) extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles
10) disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris
11) disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from WTC debris
12) disappearance of elevator doors, office doors, office cubicle walls, toilets and sinks from WTC debris
13) several floor fragments fused together in “meteorite” object
14) bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during destruction
15) multiple blast waves during destruction of tower
16) large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destruction
17) small backpack-sized fission nukes exist
18) fission-nuke technology well-established
19) low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments and China syndrome
20) EMP formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial burning)
21) Description of heat in WTC blast cloud
22) Extensive cover-up of ground zero air by EPA
23) High rate of cancers, including thyroid cancer typically associated with radiation exposure, in ground zero responders
24) Melted, hanging skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire
25) Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC basement reported by Pecoraro
26) Steel beam bent in U, without cracking, evidence of extreme high temps
27) Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface
28) Extreme overall devastation of two massive towers and blasted out Ground Zero aftermath
29) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical DEW theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (EMP, extreme pulverization of tower into dust) but denies nukes at all costs
30) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical thermite (super nano-thermite) theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (molten steel, china syndrome) but denies nukes at all costs
31) Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust— evidence of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes
32) Pyroclastic debris cloud during WTC destruction
33) Upwards jutting debris trails reminiscent of debris trails formed during underground nuke test
34) Small bright flashes during destruction of both towers
35) Extremely compacted ground zero debris

i thought it was some Jews dancing around with a palladium micro fission blaster, aimed at building 7... Cheney did it... bush had a detonator in his pocket while he was at the school...cabal...the bankers...NWO did it... anyone with a Jewish-sounding name was involved... oh, and my favorite, Zionists...(they were the masterminds of everyone listed above...)

Don't forget the MASTERMIND,Gladys Kravitz!





and she was Party to this!

http://www.scribd.com/doc/49630990/Dimitri-Khalezov-The-Third-Truth-about-911-WTC-Nuclear-Demolition-13-Free-Chapters-v3-2011

You haven't heard that from me either,OK?

you really haven't got a Clue about Explosives and their Application,do you?