Topic: President vows to "do what's necessary" in Syria and Iran
no photo
Tue 05/07/13 09:16 AM

A multitude of opinions that say nothing, especially to those who dominates events.

metalwing's photo
Tue 05/07/13 09:25 AM
I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."

Toodygirl5's photo
Tue 05/07/13 11:03 AM

I have to be honest here and accept that it is us Europeans that are gunning for a fight in Syria. The US is self sufficient in oil I believe but Europe have to depend on middle east oil. We are arming Islamic Jihadists and foreign mercenaries to do our killing for cheap oil. We Europeans are guilty of murder for oil. America is helping Europe but we are at the head of the unjust destruction of a sovereign country. We have sold our souls for a barrel of oil.


Very Interesting! surprised

HappyBun's photo
Tue 05/07/13 11:16 AM
Edited by HappyBun on Tue 05/07/13 11:19 AM

I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."
That is a very simplistic way of looking at the promlem. This isn't about the people of Syria. This is a blatant attempt to break up the power bloc of Syria Iran and Lebanon. Remember China and Russia are on the side of Syria. The West are on the side of Al Qaeda and the terrorists.

no photo
Tue 05/07/13 01:06 PM


I have to be honest here and accept that it is us Europeans that are gunning for a fight in Syria. The US is self sufficient in oil I believe but Europe have to depend on middle east oil. We are arming Islamic Jihadists and foreign mercenaries to do our killing for cheap oil. We Europeans are guilty of murder for oil. America is helping Europe but we are at the head of the unjust destruction of a sovereign country. We have sold our souls for a barrel of oil.


Very Interesting! surprised



Then Britain needs to negotiate with Russia.

For hundreds of years, Britain has benefited from Russia’s friendship against major threats to both countries. But today, the undoubted huge benefits of having hundreds of billions of dollars in Russian oligarchs’ flight capital based in London conflicts with BP’s massive and continuing business partnership with Russian oil majors.

, British Petroleum has been doing big business in Russia through its TNK-BP joint venture with Russian partners. BP is now closing a sale of its share in the company to Rosneft, in return for which the British oil giant will get a 20 percent equity stake and a board seat.


Read more: http://english.ruvr.ru/2013_03_20/Britain-and-Russia-forget-they-are-friends/




no photo
Tue 05/07/13 01:09 PM

I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."


The people were simply protesting. They were not starting a revolution until some outsiders decided to stage a coup.

Solution: Bring in the mercs and Al Qaeda to fake a revolution.

Kill a bunch of civilians and blame it on the current government.




HappyBun's photo
Tue 05/07/13 01:23 PM
Edited by HappyBun on Tue 05/07/13 01:23 PM


I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."


The people were simply protesting. They were not starting a revolution until some outsiders decided to stage a coup.

Solution: Bring in the mercs and Al Qaeda to fake a revolution.

Kill a bunch of civilians and blame it on the current government.




Now that is the truth of the matter in simple terms,

metalwing's photo
Tue 05/07/13 04:44 PM


I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."
That is a very simplistic way of looking at the promlem. This isn't about the people of Syria. This is a blatant attempt to break up the power bloc of Syria Iran and Lebanon. Remember China and Russia are on the side of Syria. The West are on the side of Al Qaeda and the terrorists.


"This isn't about the people of Syria."?

There isn't much to say against logic like that.

HappyBun's photo
Tue 05/07/13 05:16 PM



I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."
That is a very simplistic way of looking at the promlem. This isn't about the people of Syria. This is a blatant attempt to break up the power bloc of Syria Iran and Lebanon. Remember China and Russia are on the side of Syria. The West are on the side of Al Qaeda and the terrorists.


"This isn't about the people of Syria."?

There isn't much to say against logic like that.
Why not have a stab at it in your own words. All in your own time tell us about the involvement of America /United Kingdom/Nato/Qatar/Turkey/China/Russia/Israel/Saudi Arabia.

HappyBun's photo
Tue 05/07/13 05:18 PM



I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."
That is a very simplistic way of looking at the promlem. This isn't about the people of Syria. This is a blatant attempt to break up the power bloc of Syria Iran and Lebanon. Remember China and Russia are on the side of Syria. The West are on the side of Al Qaeda and the terrorists.


"This isn't about the people of Syria."?

There isn't much to say against logic like that.
Please use the entire post if you want to make smart comments.

no photo
Tue 05/07/13 05:38 PM

People are turning off their TV's because they are tired of paying for 45 mins of corporate commercials and only getting 15 mins of programming. The truth is starting to be heard....realized....as the propaganda industry starts to fall.


My mom pays $67.00 per month for cable television. There are more and more commercials every day. More commercials than programming. It drives me crazy sometimes. All she does is sit there and watch that boob tube.



Faith in the media is dead and dying as they fail to have the power they once wielded over public opinion.

Congress and the media industry are trying to pass CISPA and other bills for control of the internet.


Yep, the truth is out of control. LOL


The house of cards is coming down! The media glue that holds it all together is losing its grip.

The smart phone and social networking rise is bursting the bubble of lies the media spins.


The only people watching and believing the television are those over the age of 70.

Another thing I have noticed lately is sports shows are encroaching on the few channels I do like to watch. Basketball, baseball, football, wrestling. I hate that crap.

Then there are those stupid reality shows and stupid shows about guys hunting alligators, or pawn shop shows. I want to shoot the television like Elvis did.

frustrated frustrated


HappyBun's photo
Wed 05/08/13 02:03 AM




I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."
That is a very simplistic way of looking at the promlem. This isn't about the people of Syria. This is a blatant attempt to break up the power bloc of Syria Iran and Lebanon. Remember China and Russia are on the side of Syria. The West are on the side of Al Qaeda and the terrorists.


"This isn't about the people of Syria."?

There isn't much to say against logic like that.
Why not have a stab at it in your own words. All in your own time tell us about the involvement of America /United Kingdom/Nato/Qatar/Turkey/China/Russia/Israel/Saudi Arabia.
I forgot to add Jordan and the UAE to that list.

no photo
Wed 05/08/13 03:02 AM
More like they vow to do what's necessary for THEMSELVE'S. They always do.

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 05/08/13 04:44 AM





I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."
That is a very simplistic way of looking at the promlem. This isn't about the people of Syria. This is a blatant attempt to break up the power bloc of Syria Iran and Lebanon. Remember China and Russia are on the side of Syria. The West are on the side of Al Qaeda and the terrorists.


"This isn't about the people of Syria."?

There isn't much to say against logic like that.
Why not have a stab at it in your own words. All in your own time tell us about the involvement of America /United Kingdom/Nato/Qatar/Turkey/China/Russia/Israel/Saudi Arabia.
I forgot to add Jordan and the UAE to that list.

Yep,everyone who is allied to that Evil West!
Durchsichtig my Man!:laughing:

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Wed 05/08/13 05:10 AM

The necessary thing for us to do..... stay the hell out of foreign affairs!

metalwing's photo
Wed 05/08/13 03:34 PM




I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."
That is a very simplistic way of looking at the promlem. This isn't about the people of Syria. This is a blatant attempt to break up the power bloc of Syria Iran and Lebanon. Remember China and Russia are on the side of Syria. The West are on the side of Al Qaeda and the terrorists.


"This isn't about the people of Syria."?

There isn't much to say against logic like that.
Please use the entire post if you want to make smart comments.


Perhaps you didn't notice. the first post above about the commentator's remark was made by me. The entire context of the discussion from which I quoted was "The people of Syria" and what could have been done earlier to help them.

You have an amazing ability to twist anything you read to mean anything you want.

HappyBun's photo
Wed 05/08/13 05:42 PM





I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."
That is a very simplistic way of looking at the promlem. This isn't about the people of Syria. This is a blatant attempt to break up the power bloc of Syria Iran and Lebanon. Remember China and Russia are on the side of Syria. The West are on the side of Al Qaeda and the terrorists.


"This isn't about the people of Syria."?

There isn't much to say against logic like that.
Please use the entire post if you want to make smart comments.


Perhaps you didn't notice. the first post above about the commentator's remark was made by me. The entire context of the discussion from which I quoted was "The people of Syria" and what could have been done earlier to help them.

You have an amazing ability to twist anything you read to mean anything you want.
You edited my post to suit your comment. Now it is not too late to rectify that so would you like to give us your opinion on my original post. Thank you

metalwing's photo
Wed 05/08/13 05:45 PM






I heard an interesting remark on the commentaries this weekend.

"If we had gone in when we found out the people were being killed and were rising up against a brutal dictator, we would have been on the side of the people. Just regular people like you and me. But now, if we go in we are on the side of Al queda, the muslin brotherhood, and the rest who have joined the fight."
That is a very simplistic way of looking at the promlem. This isn't about the people of Syria. This is a blatant attempt to break up the power bloc of Syria Iran and Lebanon. Remember China and Russia are on the side of Syria. The West are on the side of Al Qaeda and the terrorists.


"This isn't about the people of Syria."?

There isn't much to say against logic like that.
Please use the entire post if you want to make smart comments.


Perhaps you didn't notice. the first post above about the commentator's remark was made by me. The entire context of the discussion from which I quoted was "The people of Syria" and what could have been done earlier to help them.

You have an amazing ability to twist anything you read to mean anything you want.
You edited my post to suit your comment. Now it is not too late to rectify that so would you like to give us your opinion on my original post. Thank you

You didn't have an original post. You made a meaningless false statement concerning my post.

HappyBun's photo
Wed 05/08/13 05:49 PM
You edited my post in reply to yours. Why did you feel the need to do that?

metalwing's photo
Wed 05/08/13 05:59 PM

You edited my post in reply to yours. Why did you feel the need to do that?


I quoted your false statement. Unless you were aware of the commentary to which I referred, you have no basis in fact to make such statements.

You apparently take any given statement by others and twist the meaning to whatever degree is necessary to make your points. This pattern is easily recognized and is commonly referred to as intellectual dishonesty. A very good example, in this case, would be your use of the term "my original post", when in fact, none of your statements were original posts of any kind, only responses to my post. To you, I guess you think it makes your point stronger, but in reality it just looks like you have trouble paying attention and telling the truth.