This is sort of interesting..and strange...

The other day I was reading some website, about remote viewing
and how some people (even the government) are doing it. I never put much interest into it
but I understand the quantum science behind it on a quantum level.. but will it work in the
macro world? I don’t know.

So I decided to try something of my own, similar to remote viewing future events.
I am starting to experiment with my own version of their method using the target method
described by the string theorist who believes in multiple time lines. ( I don’t believe
in infinite multiple time lines, but I think the future target event idea is a good one.)

What they do is hire a remote viewer to focus on a future targeted event which will
be chosen by another subject some time in the future. The remote viewer draws pictures
and describes what he or she sees for that chosen target. Then, after the actual event
happens, the person choosing the target event picks an event that has already happened,
but he does this two months later. Then they compare the remote viewer’s notes to
what the target event was to see if they were right.

What a remote viewer does is to connect with a person who witnesses and choses the event
and then they try to see what the event is.... but it is an event in the future.

This kind of quantum viewing is based on the non-local nature of events being connected
even over spans of time, not just space.

So, my personal method is the person who choses my target event will have to be me because I think I can connect
with my future self with no problem, and try to see the event.

This is how I am doing it. Each morning I read the headlines on front page of the Pueblo Paper.
That intention to read the front page headlines sets up the future event knowledge for my self in the past to access from my future self.

Last night I focused on an event that would be on the front page of the Pueblo Paper today, and I
came up with an accident that involved a truck, a semi truck on the highway.

This morning, an article on the front page blamed a death on the weather.. I read further and the
accident that took a life had involved a semi-truck and a pick-up. So I counted this first experiment as a success.

So did I just get lucky? Probably.
I am going to continue the experiments on a daily basis for practice.
We will see.

My feelings for tomorrow's paper involves a missing girl who may be dead.

I think it involves a death because out of the several articles on the News paper's front page today, the one about the truck accident was the only one that involved a death, so I am thinking that I am seeing what I feel to be more significant news item, and that is when a death is involved.

Missing or found... I can't decide which it feels like.

You are just foretelling the future. There is no evidence that you can connect the dot. Foretelling will come up with only two options. If it comes it pure luck if it isn't then its pure guess. What about another target not a tragedy, its common.

No, I am not exactly foretelling the future, I am supposedly specifically attempting to connect with my future self who is reading the headlines in the next day's paper.

And yes, that is one method for 'foretelling' the future, but it is done specifically via a target event. (not just some random future event.)

This specific target is one located on the front page of a specific newspaper.

If I succeed in getting good at it maybe I can learn to read the lotto numbers for the next day. LOL

If that so there are many questions to be answered. If it will come true can you write it down also so that i can ask question?

Maybe can be. It just depends upon your focus and determination.

Yes I am going to keep notes and keep practicing.

Sorry to burst your bubble but it doesn't work for that. You have to substitute objects for the numbers.

Tell me more...

The news on front page today was about a shoot out on the streets of Las Vegas where some cars were crashed. Two people died.

I'll call that a miss.

Its ok. Science explains everything but not the fate of others