Spot the irony in this thread.

Explain the irony. I don't get it.

His opinion is here nor there. Self evident rights, like his freedom of speech, are not to be infringed. Me? I'd rather suffer at the hands of a hotty news reader. I filter it all through my intuitive opinion anyway.

I have no problem with him using his "freedom of speech." What I have a problem with is why anyone even listens to him, or why he is getting all the exposure he is getting. He's a Brit right? He should mind his own British business and stop trying to tell Americans what they should do in America.

Americans should stop putting him on their television and stop listening to him.

He's just a tool for an agenda. His opinion is sponsored by fill in the blank. His audience already made up their mind. It's the same as watching highlights in slo-mo. His guests are invited to confirm that gun owners are all crazy. Consider it a chess move; the powers that be are thinking at least 3 moves ahead.
Anger is the expected response. Dead children are the pawn. It's beneath consideration in my mind to feed the fire. We are in the throws of self evident rights being compromised with both brute and so called legal force. Like they say; it's the one you don't see coming that gets you.

Here's one. Immigration reform and housing loans. The only reason housing is one the rise is for investors. Let's say that as one hand washes the other amnesty is granted if the illegal will occupy these houses none of us could get a loan for. Now we have a flooded labor market that will supress wages for the average Joe. The reason it will float is because the bleeding hearts love it and the elitists love it.
And all the while most of us agree there's nothing wrong with legal, gradual immigration. But we're considered racists by the two spectrums to our left and right. The right passed all the laws the left needs to hammer the nail in the coffin. We need to think higher thoughts, respectfully.