Taormino to speak on feminist pornography
Tuesday, Nov. 27, 2012, 4:30 p.m. · Wallace Hall, Room 165
e-mail | print
Author and director Tristan Taormino will speak on " Feminist Porn: The Politics of Producing Pleasure " at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. 27, in Wallace Hall, Room 165. She will discuss issues of gender, sexuality, race and class in pornography, and argue that feminists must disrupt normative depictions in the medium and create new kinds of imagery.
http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S35/33/59K07/index.xml?section=announcements
Subsequently, she directed Tristan Taormino's House of *** for Adam & Eve,
which shows a number of " porn stars" (from famous to unknown).
The Feministing Five: Tristan Taormino.
Tristan Taormino is a feminist pornographer and sex educator, and the author of half a dozen books, including the acclaimed The Ultimate Guide to Anal Sex for Women . Taormino is also the editor of the annual anthology Best Lesbian Erotica , which she has worked on for many years. For nine years, she was a syndicated sex and relationships columnist for The Village Voice , and she still offers relationship and sex advice to readers at her website. She is also responsible for the new DVD “The Expert’s Guide to Female Orgasm,” which, according to Miriam’s review earlier this week, is very, very hot.
Taormino has her own film production company is called Smart *** Productions, which allows her the freedom to make feminist porn. Taormino’s pornography is feminist, by her definition, because it focuses on female pleasure, and because she strives to make porn that humanizes the performers and takestheir desires into account. This is partlybecause this is the kind of porn Taormino believes in,and partly because she knows there’s a segment of the porn-watching publicwho are “tired of seeing videos where the women either don’t come or their orgasms are clearly fake.” To that end, Taormino makes porn with a “focus is on fresh and accessible performers, hot, spontaneous sex, realchemistry and real orgasms for everyone.”
Taormino also travelsthe country speaking and giving workshops, and she’sgoing on tour next month. Check out her schedule to see if she’s coming to a citynear you.
And now, without further ado, the Feministing Five, with Tristan Taormino.
Chloe Angyal: How did you get into feminist pornography and sexeducation?
Tristan Taormino: Well, I was supposed to go to law school, and that didn’t happen. I went to Wesleyan University in the early nineties, and it was this hotbed of activism, and I did a lot of LGBT activism and lived in a special interest house called Womanist House. I really imagined that Iwas going to go on to law school to do public service for people who didn’t have access to the system. And I had really good grades, and a really great resume and recommendations, and I had average LSAT scores and everyone told me notto worry. But in the spring of my senior year, I was rejected by all thirteen schools that I appliedto. I was in a panic, and I went to see my thesis adviser, Professor Claire Potter, and I was crying, saying, “This was the plan, this was the plan, I have no plan now!” And she said, “Tristan, I don’t think you want to go to law school, and I don’t think you want to be a lawyer. I think you want to write about sex. And I think you’re really good at it.” I had written about sex in my senior thesis project, which was about lesbian sexuality, but it neveroccurred to me that it could be a job. I got off the wait list for one school, and she encouraged me to defer admission for a year and figure out what I wanted todo. I never went to law school, and that amazing teacher really changed the course of my life.
I started writing about sex as fiction, really writing about my own sexual experiences and changing people’s names and descriptions to protect their privacy. In 1996 I started my own zine. It was called Pucker Up, and it was all about sex and gender and radical sexuality and identity. People contributed fiction and non-fiction, and poetry and photos. That kind of put me on the map, and from that I got my job doing the anthology Best Lesbian Erotica for Cleis Press. At that point, there just wasn’t a lot of lesbian erotica on theshelf, so it was a risk for them, for sure. After I’d been working with them for a year, they sent out a call saying that they were looking forproposals for books about a single sex topic. They didn’t want a broad sex how-to book, they wanted to know what single sex topic we would focus on if we could. I thought about that question and I had the answerright away, which was that I wanted to write a book about anal sex, and I wanted it to be for women. They didn’t anticipate that that’s what I’d say, and I didn’t think they’d anticipated that this would be the first book they would publish in this series that they went on to do, but they’re a queer, feminist, sex-positive press, and they really believed in it when bookstores and others were a little bit freaked out aboutit.
So I started teaching workshops all about anal sex, based on my book. I got up in front of a room full ofpeople, most of themstrangers, I talked about anal sex, and the very first time I taught a workshop was a light bulb moment, like, “This iswhere I’m supposed to be, and this is what I’m supposed to be doing.” So fromthere I expanded my repertoire of teaching, I went on to write my column for The Village Voice , and then I wanted tomake a video versionof my book. I knew I wanted it to be reallyexplicit, and I knew that would automatically put it in the territory of porn, of hardcore, explicit sex. I pitched it to a bunch of reallymainstream adult companies. All of them turned me down, and then John Stagliano called a couple of months later and said he wanted to make the movie. So I made my movie The Ultimate Guide to Anal Sex for Women . I kept doingmy sex education work, and then in 2005 I came back to porn, because I felt like there still wasn’t enough educational porn out there. I wanted to see if I could put my own stamp on it, and I was also interested in making porn that wasn’t necessarily educational, that wasn’t framed as educational, but that represented the kind of porn that I wantedto see but didn’t feel was on the shelf.
CA: Who is your favorite fictional heroine, and who areyour heroines in real life?
TT: I think it’s the Wicked Witch of the West, from Wicked the book and the musical. She’s also known as Elphaba, orthe Green Witch. She’s always struck me as a really strong character. She’s an outcast, yet she has this tremendous confidence and self-assurance to stand up for what she believes in. She defies The Wizard, with a capital W. Andshe does it not by pitting herself against another woman who’s different from her, but by joining forces with this other woman, who’s different and has hada very different life experience. And I was raised by a gay man, so I love musicals.
My heroines in real life are easily. Susie Bright, Betty Dodson,Annie Sprinkle, Nina Hartley. These are women who really broke ground in the field of feminist porn,queer porn and feminist sex education. I feel like, individually, each of them kicked down somany doors, and thatI wouldn’t have the career that I do without all the work that they did, and that they continue todo. These are womenwho are still writing, teaching and educating, and creating really necessary work, and are really the founders of the modern sex-positive movement.
CA: What recent newsstory made you wantto scream?
TT: A better question is, is there a recent news story that doesn’t make me want to throw my computer across the room? It’s a little depressing, and there are times whenI have to turn away from CNN because it makes me so crazy. The one that comes to mind is that at thevery end of the year, there was this Gallup poll released on the most admired women on 2010. And Sarah Palin was on the list. And I think she was second – above pretty incredible, kick-*** women. I’m still entirely baffled by how Sarah Palin is onthe national political stage. I’m sure she’s a nice enough person, but she has a political background that’s sketchy at best – there’s a lot of rumors and scandals swirling around her political career in Alaska. She’s not thatbright, and I personally want my leaders to be smarterthan me. And she spouts this pseudo right wing-feminism,and it’s entirely perplexing to me that people buy it. I guess I just can’t understand what people see in her, because I don’t see it.
CA: What, in your opinion, is the greatest challenge facing feminism today?
TT: There seem to be a lot of them. On the one hand, there are some amazing youngfeminists. They’re a different generation than I am, and they’re living in a different time, and we need to really listen to them. But onthe other hand, thereare all these young women who I meet at colleges who don’tidentify as feminists. And I feel like they take for granted some of the things that past generationsreally fought for. They don’t have a sense of history. It’s like everyone skipped Women’s Studies 101. So I’m perplexed about whyyoung women shy away from this label, “Feminist.” And the irony is that feminists fought so hard and made so much change – they sort of fought for your right to be so blasé about not identifying as a feminist. And that’s aweird paradox to me.
The other piece of it is that the why our media culture is now,everything feels very black and white. Everything feels structured around debates. And to me, feminism is about complexity and different voices, and it’s about me and Catherine MacKinnon both considering ourselves feminists, and disagreeing, rabidly, about some major issues. I feel like feminism is about nuance and layers, and I don’t know how to translate that into the media culture wehave now, where it’s all about soundbites and where you stand.You’re on one side or the other. I was interested to see Jaclyn Friedman take on Naomi Wolf and provide this nuanced point of view. She said, “Do I think the charges against Julian Assange are politically motivated?Yeah. But do I think that there’s also some really ****ed up **** being said about rape? Yeah!” But in some ways, there’s no room in mainstream media outlets to say that. You’ve got to be on one side or the other.And that’s not my idea of feminism, and I feel like feminism is in conflict with this entirely soundbite-driven media culture.
CA: You’re going to a desert island, and you’re allowed to take one food, one drink and one feminist. What do you pick?
TT: Chocolate shortbread cookies from Soma in Toronto, freshly squeezed lemonade and the feminists who are in my Buddhist book club – Alice, Amber and Wyndi.
http://feministing.com/2011/01/08/the-feministing-five-tristan-taormino/