The Solution Is Not Negotiations Or UN Resolutions, Only Jihad

"Oh world, oh Muslims everywhere, oh Zionists who are usurping and attacking our holy places, [know that] Allah will punish the Zionists for every drop of blood they have spilled upon the beloved soil of Palestine, even if a long time has passed. [They will be punished for] the massacres in Deir Yassin, in the Cave of the Patriarchs, and in Kana in South Lebanon, for the [spilled] blood of the Sinai War hostages and for the blood [they have spilled] in the Golan Heights, Gaza and [West] Bank. There isn't a foot of Palestinian soil that has not been watered with the blood of the martyrs, and Allah does not forget this blood, for it is said: 'And never think that Allah is unaware of what the wrongdoers do. He only delays them for a day when eyes will stare [in horror]' [Koran 14:42]. Even if Allah delays [their punishment], they will not escape Him, [and he will punish them] after they go too far, just He did to others before them..."

"Oh Muslims, Allah enabled his worshippers, the believers, to fend off oppression and discrimination and promised them victory... It is time for the Muslim nation to unite as one for the sake of Palestine and Jerusalem, since the Jews have [imposed] tyranny over this land, spread corruption in the world, spilled [the Muslims'] blood, tramped their honor and their sanctities, and defiled even what is holy to the Jews themselves. They escalated their tyranny by turning Al-Aqsa into a house of prayer for Jews, [because] they want to share it with the Muslims. If we agree to this, their next step will be to destroy [Al-Aqsa] and build their temple in its place. This deception [of theirs] will lead them to perdition: what they planned for others will be done unto them, and Allah will free the world of their filth and corruption. How different is their crime from [the act of] 'Umar bin Al-Khattab, who preserved the honor of the beloved Al-Aqsa mosque.

"The Muslims must know and the believers must be certain that [the goals of] regaining the holy places and protecting [our] honor and lives from the Jews will never be achieved through UN documents or through negotiations – for the Zionists know only force, and they will not repent their evil ways unless forced to do so. This will be achieved only through holy jihad, through considerable sacrifice and through all forms of resistance. When [the Jews] realize that we [mean to] take this road and raise the banner of jihad for the sake of Allah and set forth into the arena of jihad, it will prevent them from oppressing you..."

Sounds like they want to kill all non muslims.

http://www.meforum.org/1754/peace-or-jihad-abrogation-in-islam

Abrogation and Jihad

How does the theological debate over abrogation impact contemporary policy formulation? While not all terrorism is rooted in Islam, the religion is an enabler for many. It is wrong to assume that more extreme interpretations of religion are illegitimate. Statements that there is no compulsion in religion and that jihad is primarily about internal struggle and not about holy war may receive applause in university lecture halls and diplomatic board rooms, but they misunderstand the importance of abrogation in Islamic theology. It is important to acknowledge that what university scholars believe, and what most Muslims—or more extreme Muslims—believe are two different things. For many Islamists and radical Muslims, abrogation is real and what the West calls terror is, indeed, just.

During the lifetime of Muhammad, the Islamic community passed through three stages. In the beginning from 610 until 622, God commanded restraint. As the Muslims relocated to Medina (623-26), God permitted Muslims only to fight in a defensive war. However, in the last six years of Muhammad's life (626-32), God permitted Muslims to fight an aggressive war first against polytheists,[52] and later against monotheists like the Jews of Khaybar.[53] Once Muhammad was given permission to kill in the name of God, he instigated battle.

Chapter 9 of the Qur'an, in English called "Ultimatum," is the most important concerning the issues of abrogation and jihad against unbelievers. It is the only chapter that does not begin "in the name of God, most benevolent, ever-merciful."[54] Commentators agree that Muhammad received this revelation in 631, the year before his death, when he had returned to Mecca and was at his strongest.[55] Muhammad bin Ismail al-Bukhari (810-70), compiler of one of the most authoritative collections of the hadith, said that "Ultimatum" was the last chapter revealed to Muhammad[56] although others suggest it might have been penultimate. Regardless, coming at or near the very end of Muhammad's life, "Ultimatum" trumps earlier revelations.

Because this chapter contains violent passages, it abrogates previous peaceful content. Muhsin Khan, the translator of Sahih al-Bukhari, says God revealed "Ultimatum" in order to discard restraint and to command Muslims to fight against all the pagans as well as against the People of the Book if they do not embrace Islam or until they pay religious taxes. So, at first aggressive fighting was forbidden; it later became permissible (2:190) and subsequently obligatory (9:5).[57] This "verse of the sword" abrogated, canceled, and replaced 124 verses that called for tolerance, compassion, and peace.[58]

Suyuti said that everything in the Qur'an about forgiveness and peace is abrogated by verse 9:5, which orders Muslims to fight the unbelievers and to establish God's kingdom on earth.

Prior to receiving "Ultimatum," Muhammad had reached agreements with various Arab tribes. But when God gave Muhammad a revelation (2:190-2), Muhammad felt justified in breaking his cease-fire. For Isma'il bin Kathir (1301-73), a student of Ibn Taymiyya and an influential Qur'an interpreter in his own right, it is clear: As jihad involves death and the killing of men, God draws attention to the fact that disbelief, polytheism, and avoidance of God's path as shown by the Qur'an are worse than killing them.[59] This creates license for future generations of Muslims to kill non-Muslims solely on the basis of their refusal to accept Islam.

According to Ibn Kathir in his commentary on Chapter 9:5, Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, the first caliph, used this and other verses to validate fighting anyone who either did not pay religious taxes to the Muslims or convert to Islam. Ibn ‘Umar Ibn al-Khattab, one of the hadith transmitters, quoted Muhammad as saying, "I have been commanded to fight the people until they testify that there is no deity worthy of worship except God and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God." He testified that Ad-Dahhak bin Muzahim, an authentic transmitter of hadiths, said that the verse of the sword "abrogated every agreement of peace between the Prophet and any idolater, every treaty, and every term." ‘Awfi cited Ibn ‘Abbas, who argued that "Ultimatum" obviated earlier peace treaties.[60] The Shafi‘i school took this as a justification for killing anyone who abandoned prayer and for fighting anyone who refused to pay increased religious minority taxes.[61]

Such interpretations resonate. Muhammad Sa‘id Ramadan al-Buti, a contemporary Al-Azhar University scholar, wrote that "the verse (9:5) does not leave any room in the mind to conjecture about what is called defensive war. This verse asserts that holy war, which is demanded in Islamic law, is not a defensive war because it could legitimately be an offensive war. That is the apex and most honorable of all holy wars. Its goal is the exaltation of the word of God, the construction of Islamic society, and the establishment of God's kingdom on earth regardless of the means. It is legal to carry on an offensive holy war."[62]

Defensive warfare in Islam is nothing but a phase of the Islamic mission that the Prophet practiced. After that, it was followed by another phase, that is, calling all people to embrace Islam. Even for People of the Book, there can be no role except conversion to Islam or subjugation to Muslim rule. Hence, Muhammad's statement, "They would not invade you, but you invade them."[63]
Modern Revisionism of Jihad

David Powers, a well-known researcher of classical Islam, agreed that 9:5 abrogates no less than 124 verses that command or imply anything less than a total offensive against the non-believers. However, he says the verse is itself considered to be abrogated by the conditional clause with which it concludes: "But if they repent and perform the prayer and pay the alms, then let them go their way."[64] But such a condition is not magnanimous: When infidels repent and perform the Muslim prayer and pay alms, it means they have become Muslims. Once they are Muslims, there is no need to slay them. The clause thus becomes more coercive than conditional. It suggests than a non-Muslim must convert to Islam or be slain.

Still, no verse is more frequently cited by contemporary Muslims preachers and analysts to depict Islam as peaceful and compassionate as 2:256, "Let there be no compulsion in religion." For Sheikh Abdur Rahman, the chief justice of Pakistan, this verse is one of the most important, containing a charter of freedom of conscience unparalleled in the religious annals of mankind.[65]

Muhammad offered this verse in his first year of residence in Medina when he needed the Jews' support. Nahhas, with the authority of Ibn ‘Abbas, said: "Scholars differed concerning 2:256. Some said it has been abrogated by 9:73 for the Prophet compelled the Arabs to embrace Islam and fight those that had no alternative but to surrender to Islam. Other scholars said that 2:256 had not been abrogated concerning the People of the Book. It is only the infidels who are compelled to embrace Islam."[66] Suyuti does not see 2:256 abrogated by 9:73 but rather interprets 9:73 as a case of postponing the fight until Muslims become strong. He argues that when Muslims were weak, God commanded them to be patient.[67]

This is also the case of sura 9:29, which deals with Jews and Christians. Fighting them is mentioned after the clarification regarding fighting the idolaters (9:5). This verse (9:29) was revealed when Muhammad was commanded to fight the Byzantines and prepared the expedition to Tabuk. Ibn Kathir declared: The order is to fight the People of the Book until they pay the jizyah (protection tax) with willing submission and feel themselves subdued. Had they been true believers in their religions, that faith would have directed them to believe in Muhammad because all prophets commanded them to obey and follow him. Yet when he was sent, they disbelieved in him even though he is the "mightiest of all messengers because it suits their desires and lusts, and because they disbelieved in the master, the mightiest, the last and most perfect of all prophets."

Ibn Kathir continues: "This honorable verse was revealed with the order to fight the People of the Book. After the pagans were defeated, the people entered God's religion in large numbers, and the Arabian Peninsula was secured under the Muslims' control."[68]
Conclusions

The issue of abrogation in Islam is critical to understanding both jihad and da'wa, the propagation of Islam. Some Muslims may preach tolerance and argue that jihad refers only to an internal, peaceful struggle to better oneself. Western commentators can convince themselves that such teachings are correct. However, for learned Muslim scholars and populist leaders, such notions are or should be risible. They recognize that, in practice, there is compulsion in Islam. They take seriously the notion that the Qur'an teaches not just tolerance among religions, but tolerance among religions on the terms of Islam. To understand the challenge of the current Islamist revival, it is crucial for non-Muslims and moderate Muslims alike to recognize that interpretation of Islamic doctrine can have two faces, and that the Medinan face may very well continue to overshadow the Meccan face for a major portion, if not the majority, of contemporary Muslims.

Waging Jihad To Restore Jerusalem Is A Duty Incumbent Upon All Muslims

"Oh people of the world, know that the importance we ascribe to Al-Aqsa stems from many fundamental truths, including:

"1. It was the first qibla, [i.e., the direction] in which the Muslims and the Prophet [prayed] for almost 16 months after the hijra...

"2. It is the gateway to Paradise, to which the Prophet traveled and through which he ascended to heaven.

"3. The Prophet Muhammad prayed there, leading the [other] prophets in prayer...

"4. Al-Aqsa is one of the three mosques that [the Muslims] are commanded to visit, which gives every Muslim in the world a right to visit it and make pilgrimage to it, just as he visits the Holy Mosque [in Mecca] and the Mosque of the Prophet [in Medina]. This obligates the Muslims to make sure that the area [of Al-Aqsa] is under their rule and control, so that the way to Al-Aqsa is safe and open to [Muslim] visitors and so nobody prevents them [from coming]. If others have holy sites in this area that they make pilgrimage to, then Islam respects [these holy sites] and preserves them, for Islam is the only religion that allows other religions to exist under its rule without imposing upon their followers anything that is contrary to their beliefs. Islam recognizes these religions and allows their followers to perform their rituals.

"5. Jerusalem and Palestine are Muslim soil and land that was conquered by the first Muslims – especially Jerusalem. The Second Caliph 'Umar bin Al-Khattab received the keys to the city and prayed in it, and all the [Christian] priests and monks placed the Tomb of the Sepulcher under his protection. He acted as the tolerant verses [of the Koran instructed him to], and this was recorded in the annals of history. He refused to pray in the Tomb of the Sepulcher, out of fear that one day Muslims would say ''Umar Al-Farouq prayed here' and would turn the church into a Mosque. So he came out of the church and prayed outside it.

"This land remained under Muslim rule almost until today. The Muslims seldom lost control of it, except on a few widely-separated occasions, and [only] for a few decades [at a time], after which they quickly recaptured it, and all the people were pleased and happy with the just and tolerant [rule] of Islam.

"In light of all the above, there is a general consensus among Muslim scholars that Jerusalem is Islamic, that nobody has the right to give up any part of it, and that waging jihad to recapture it is a duty incumbent upon all Muslims, Arab or non-Arab – for all [Muslims] are required to defend the holy places, chief among them [Al-Aqsa]. The world, and especially the Zionists, must not forget the words of [the 35th Ottoman Sultan] 'Abd Al-Hamid, who said that neither he nor any other king, sultan or emir was authorized to give up or sell even an inch of Palestine, even in return for [all] the treasures of this world, because it is Islamic waqf for ever."

http://www.jpost.com/International/Article.aspx?id=199451



The Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini was later the notorious Nazi who mixed Nazi propaganda and Islam. He was wanted for war crimes and the slaughter of Jews in Bosnia by Yugoslavia. His mix of militant propagandizing Islam was an inspriation for both Yasser Arafat and Saddam Husein. He was also a close relative of Yasser Arafat and grandfather of the current Temple Mount Mufti. "Arafat's actual name was Abd al-Rahman abd al-Bauf Arafat al-Qud al-Husseini. He shortened it to obscure his kinship with the notorious Nazi and ex-Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Muhammed Amin al-Husseini." Howard M. Sachar, A HISTORY OF ISRAEL (New York: Knopf, 1976). The Bet Agron International Center in Jerusalem interviewed Arafat's brother and sister, who described the Mufti as a cousin (family member) with tremendous influence on young Yassir after the Mufti returned from Berlin to Cairo. Yasser Arafat himself keeps his exact lineage and birthplace secret. Saddam Hussein was raised in the house of his uncle Khayrallah Tulfah, who was a leader in the Mufti's pro-Nazi coup in Iraq in May 1941.

The Muslims Will Never Negotiate Over Jerusalem And Al-Aqsa; Every Sacrifice Is Worthwhile For Their Sake

"The Holy Mosque and the Al-Aqsa Mosque are equally valuable, so one cannot be separated from the other. Whenever the Holy Mosque is evoked, Al-Aqsa is also evoked, for it is said: 'Exalted is He who took His Servant by night from the Holy Mosque to Al-Aqsa Mosque' [Koran 17:1]... Al-Aqsa is second only to the Holy Mosque among the mosques worth visiting[2]... Al-Aqsa is the very life of the Muslim nation, not just a historical [monument] that the strong winds of time shall erode or that the Muslims shall gradually forget as the occupation continues. For Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa are planted deep in the Muslims' [hearts], and the love and sanctity [of Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa] flow in their veins and fill their hearts. [The Muslim nation] will never consent to negotiate over them, and any sacrifice it must make for them, in blood or money, is considered a small price to pay. By Allah, we love them more than our own souls, and no Muslims would hesitate to sacrifice his soul for them."

"Islam is the religion that Allah chose for all of mankind... As for... Abraham, the Father of the Prophets, the Jews and Christians have tried to claim him as their own and to [claim] the honor of being associated with him, and then Allah informed them firmly that we [Muslims are the ones who] have the honor of claiming him, and that he is the father who gave us the name 'Muslims'...

"[As stated in Koran 5:97,] Allah made his Holy House [the Ka'ba] a support for the people. It is the pillar upon which the world is founded. The world will not know happiness, security and stability until it is under the guardianship of the Islamic shari'a. [For] Allah guaranteed the existence of the shari'a, in order to protect the people every time war, occupation and the usurpation of the nations' resources sap their strength. [He did this] out of compassion for the people in light of the tyranny and dictatorship of the rulers, for Islam is the [people's] only means to obtain equality, honor and social justice..."

No, they are fairly happy with slaves.

and young girls?

And infant boys.

This shows how stupid the Muslims and Muslim Brotherhood is and how blind they are by their hatred. First of all of Israel wanted to get rid of Al-Aqsa it would have been destroyed and leveled in the 1960's.

The Waqf Ministry of Jordan held control of the al-Aqsa Mosque until the 1967 Six-Day War. After Israel's victory in that war, instead of the government taking control of the al-Aqsa Mosque, Israel transferred the control of the mosque and the northern Noble Sanctuary to the Islamic waqf trust, who are independent of the Israeli government.

the 1969 arson attack, Israel employed architects, technicians and craftsmen in a committee that carry out regular maintenance operations and help restore the Mosque. Some activities included refurbishing abandoned structures and renovating.

Muslims and Palestinians living in East Jerusalem are allowed to enter and pray at the al-Aqsa Mosque without restrictions.

Many rabbis, including Israel's chief rabbinate since 1967, have ruled that Jews should not walk on the Temple Mount. Israeli governmental restrictions only forbid Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount. Although the Israeli Supreme Court has supported individual (as opposed to group) prayer, in practice Israeli police bar a Jew from praying "in any overt manner whatsoever on the Temple Mount, even if he is just moving his lips in prayer."

As long as they are under 10 years old.

Hey Do.
They can use infants closed legs to get their nut. Just as long as they don't penetrate the anus or vagina.
They can use boys or girls.

Article Eight: The Slogan of the Hamas
Allah is its goal, the Prophet its model, the Qur’an its Constitution, Jihad its path and death for the case of Allah its most sublime belief