Topic: Larry King to Moderate "3rd Party" Debate | |
---|---|
|
|
He's still alive?
![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 10/17/12 07:59 AM
|
|
He's still alive? ![]() And more than ever! With him as moderator they won't be able to deny coverage on at least some of the networks! |
|
|
|
Edited by
s1owhand
on
Wed 10/17/12 08:05 AM
|
|
did anybody snopes this yet?!
![]() j/k it appears to be for real....not good for Romney though. might be good for John Stewart... |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 10/17/12 08:13 AM
|
|
did anybody snopes this yet?! ![]() j/k it appears to be for real....not good for Romney though. might be good for John Stewart... It's for real! It will be interesting to see how the MSM downplays this since Larry is still "with" CNN even tho he retired to allow Piers Morgan his show/slot. The majority of those that "do get out and vote" have followed Larry for years and if they hear about this, and it does go mainstream...... Let's just say this could get very interesting! |
|
|
|
did anybody snopes this yet?! ![]() j/k it appears to be for real....not good for Romney though. might be good for John Stewart... It's for real! It will be interesting to see how the MSM downplays this since Larry is still "with" CNN even tho he retired to allow Piers Morgan his show/slot. The majority of those that "do get out and vote" have followed Larry for years and if they hear about this, and it does go mainstream...... Let's just say this could get very interesting! While there is a chance of that happening it is pretty slim. This process is a sham. We need a law passed that forbids the CDP or whatever it is called from demanding the rep and dem candidates sign an agreement to not participate in other debates. |
|
|
|
Addeding to Bored.
They need to dump that 15% popularity rule and allow candidates from all parties to be in the televised debates. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 10/17/12 01:24 PM
|
|
Addeding to Bored. They need to dump that 15% popularity rule and allow candidates from all parties to be in the televised debates. That number will never be broken when the polls are controlled by "chosen questions", asked by pollsters sponsored by the 2 parties and sold by the MSM. It's no accident, and it effectively protects their 2 party millionaire boys club! Gary Johnson, despite their efforts, is polling at over 10% and more in some states. His popularity is growing, and if the Free and Equal debates go mainstream..... We may have some hope yet.. maybe get the change .. that we were promised 4 years ago! |
|
|
|
Addeding to Bored. They need to dump that 15% popularity rule and allow candidates from all parties to be in the televised debates. That number will never be broken when the polls are controlled by "chosen questions", asked by pollsters sponsored by the 2 parties and sold by the MSM. It's no accident, and it effectively protects their 2 party millionaire boys club! Gary Johnson, despite their efforts, is polling at over 10% and more in some states. His popularity is growing, and if the Free and Equal debates go mainstream..... We may have some hope yet.. maybe get the change .. that we were promised 4 years ago! I guess I can take this info on the debate to facebook and hopefully get something going there. What the hell is Ora TV? |
|
|
|
Addeding to Bored. They need to dump that 15% popularity rule and allow candidates from all parties to be in the televised debates. Perhaps if those 3rd-party candidates were to promote more popular ideas, then they'd reach the 15% minimum limit. Folks, politics is a popularity contest. |
|
|
|
Addeding to Bored. They need to dump that 15% popularity rule and allow candidates from all parties to be in the televised debates. Perhaps if those 3rd-party candidates were to promote more popular ideas, then they'd reach the 15% minimum limit. Folks, politics is a popularity contest. I like you Dodo. ![]() |
|
|
|
Hope it's not on a weekend, that ight take him away from one of his well documented swingers parties.
|
|
|
|
Addeding to Bored. They need to dump that 15% popularity rule and allow candidates from all parties to be in the televised debates. They do it to keep massive amount of people who are on the ballot to a few. It would not be possible to have a debate with everyone who is running. Time to be realistic and the wannabe's on the 3rd party ticket will never be in a debate or will get elected to the White House. They are ALL one or two issue candidates who know they stand no chance but are just lining their pocket by trying to get some exposure. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 10/18/12 07:16 AM
|
|
Addeding to Bored. They need to dump that 15% popularity rule and allow candidates from all parties to be in the televised debates. They do it to keep massive amount of people who are on the ballot to a few. It would not be possible to have a debate with everyone who is running. Time to be realistic and the wannabe's on the 3rd party ticket will never be in a debate or will get elected to the White House. They are ALL one or two issue candidates who know they stand no chance but are just lining their pocket by trying to get some exposure. ![]() ![]() What part of "choice" is it that you don't get or are willing to give up in the name of others? With thinking like that, it's no wonder our constitution can be attacked or ignored! |
|
|
|
Addeding to Bored. They need to dump that 15% popularity rule and allow candidates from all parties to be in the televised debates. Perhaps if those 3rd-party candidates were to promote more popular ideas, then they'd reach the 15% minimum limit. Folks, politics is a popularity contest. Perhaps if the media wasn't controlled by the 2 party backers people would have a chance to learn those issues, and not be so uniformed or gullible as to the choices they do have! ![]() I guess some are just too dumbed down, passified, or lazy to research and consider options. Heaven forbid we are offered a choice to confuse fixed issues! |
|
|