Topic: Idiocy of the lesser of two evils | |
---|---|
Alan Keyes points out the idiocy of the lesser of two evils argument Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4R4KtYVF-74&feature=youtu.be Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR8NgxGD1sA&feature=youtu.be |
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Wed 10/03/12 06:20 AM
|
|
Ya' know, SS.
After looking over the situation, I noticed Ron Paul played a similar game as Ross Perot. Run for a while and fade away. I did believe Paul was sincere. The similarities of the way the two ran are just too coincidental. Also, the President game that got oBummer elected was give us an idiot for an idiot. McCain played the idiot part very well. Barry won. This time it's Romney. He's doing stupid things. Not as blatantly as McCain did but, at the right time to make Barry look a little credible. I wouldn't put it past Soros and other big money, like-thinkers to be donating millions to put on these shows. I know it's illegal for one person to donate over a certain amount to any candidate. The way to get around that is the one with the millions to give out, donate it in other peoples or companies names. In all reality, Soros could own and be paying for both losers. If I had proof, I'd probably be relocated to somewhere near ole Jimmy Hoffa. |
|
|
|
Ya' know, SS. After looking over the situation, I noticed Ron Paul played a similar game as Ross Perot. Run for a while and fade away. I did believe Paul was sincere. The similarities of the way the two ran are just too coincidental. Also, the President game that got oBummer elected was give us an idiot for an idiot. McCain played the idiot part very well. Barry won. This time it's Romney. He's doing stupid things. Not as blatantly as McCain did but, at the right time to make Barry look a little credible. I wouldn't put it past Soros and other big money, like-thinkers to be donating millions to put on these shows. I know it's illegal for one person to donate over a certain amount to any candidate. The way to get around that is the one with the millions to give out, donate it in other peoples or companies names. In all reality, Soros could own and be paying for both losers. If I had proof, I'd probably be relocated to somewhere near ole Jimmy Hoffa. The corruption and manipulation of a 2 party system putting forth our choices has been like a fly in your soup for over 2 decades. You see it swimming around, you know it's there. The logical person would complain and ask for a new bowl of soup. Others will remove the fly and eat the soup anyway, or push it aside, grumble and complain, but not want to make a scene (conditioned party followers.... R&D). Then there are those who are just too busy with themselves, their lives, buying the whole of it without question, thinking it wouldn't be served if it was bad for you by the servers, trusting, won't even look, or even consider the possibility, and simply eat it with a smile on their face. It may be bitter, but it was just one bite.....right? They never consider that one bitter bite, might be the warning the whole bowl has been contaminated, containing something life threatening..... these are the most dangerous, average voters, who trust the media to make their choices for them. Boob tubers! A coin may have 2 opposing sides, but it's the same coin no matter which side comes up on a toss, our how you lay it on the counter! The results and what it buys you are the same, or a gamble at best on a toss! If a gamble "worked for most people", there wouldn't be any casinos! That's our bought and paid for 2 party system the video refers to. Two choices, perhaps, but it's the same metal thru and thru! |
|
|