2 Next
Topic: Will Hussein fold and abolish Freedom of Speech?
s1owhand's photo
Wed 09/19/12 01:55 PM







who would know that it was threat of violence that stopped the article?

who would even know about the article IF NOT for their advertising that they are going to post it 'in spite of'

my opinion is its an UNNECESSARY political statement that puts others in harms way selfishly...


Freedom of speech is freedom to express your opinion without fear
of retribution because others disagree.

Freedom of the press is the right to publish dissenting opinions
as long as they do not threaten anyone physically.

If someone tells you that you cannot express an opinion because they
will come after you then either you are stifled in expressing that
opinion and the bullies win or you express your opinion anyway and
demand that the bullies accept your right to express yourself.

In France, the US and the rest of the free civilized world the
bullies have to accept all others rights to express themselves
freely. Too bad for those who wish to suppress free speech. They
can likewise peacefully express their disagreement.

Now that's civilized.





there is nothing particularly 'civilized' about ridiculing people or their beliefs

although its common and accepted in our culture and protected legally


as I said, it seems childish to me to do something JUST BECAUSE someone else doesnt want you to


It would be like me eating spinach (which I find disgusting) just because someone else threatened me with violence if I didnt


There are some things that have multiple reasons for self censoring, or avoiding,, and refusing to do so just because someone else threatens you is actually pretty childish,,, in my opinion

I just will never find the sense in it...


They are not doing this just because someone else doesn't want them to do it in my opinion. If someone told them they did not want them
to eat spinach I doubt there would be a run at the supermarket.

laugh

(you may be a super-taster by the way)

They are publishing this to make a point that they insist on
maintaining their freedom to comedically skewer whomever they
want and they insist on their rights being protected. And that
is also big news particularly at this time and it will sell a
lot of magazines and also will make the authors champions for
a just cause. It also isn't very polite but you know...Neither
is chopping somebody's head off.





'do whatever I Want' = selfish



Do you feel that way towards extremist Muslims?


yes


skewer whomever you want does not equal "do whatever i want"

this means feel free to lampoon a political, religious or
historical figure - anyone of them based on their views.

that's free speech - it harms no one but allows for frank and
open discussions even on contentious subjects. free speech
is legal in open societies and in fact essential to having a
free society in which we debate publicly policies and regulations.

"do whatever i want" means not to accept anyone else's laws
or restrictions. robbing or honor killings or wife beating
- these are very harmful and do inflict a great deal of harm
on others and society.

so i disagree vigorously that the French magazine is saying we
should do whatever we want. on the other hand, the radical Islamists
are trying to force their backwards morals and repression on
everyone else. the radical Islamists are saying "we will do whatever
we want" - we will kill those who disagree with us and insult us
in some way according only to their twisted perceptions.

ohwell

2 Next