Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: Flight 11 ? or -- a plane or drone with a missile -- videos
Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Thu 08/30/12 04:49 PM
The word "debunked" is over used. If someone presents an opinion and what they think is "evidence" they claim they "debunked" something.

alleoops Joined Sat 08/06/11 Posts: 10832	Thu 08/30/12 05:21 PM
Or, as they say in Texas, bidness eh bidness. They say that here too. Oh.

HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Thu 08/30/12 10:27 PM
The word "debunked" is over used. If someone presents an opinion and what they think is "evidence" they claim they "debunked" something. Is this your latest tactic? If you prefer 'disproved' I'll use that instead. Either way, the claims that no plane hit the Pentagon are false.

HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Fri 08/31/12 05:30 AM Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Fri 08/31/12 05:55 AM
Documentary evidence for the existence of Flight 11. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc01.pdf http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc05.pdf I know this will discounted as evidence, but no amount of proof will lead the cult members away from their conclusions. This is for those with an open mind.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 08/31/12 01:01 PM Edited by Jeanniebean on Fri 08/31/12 01:04 PM
The word "debunked" is over used. If someone presents an opinion and what they think is "evidence" they claim they "debunked" something. Is this your latest tactic? If you prefer 'disproved' I'll use that instead. Either way, the claims that no plane hit the Pentagon are false. At this point, the whole debate and subject of 9-11 is the very least of our problems. The rest of the house of cards is coming down... soon. http://mingle2.com/topic/show/335390

HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Fri 08/31/12 02:15 PM
The word "debunked" is over used. If someone presents an opinion and what they think is "evidence" they claim they "debunked" something. Is this your latest tactic? If you prefer 'disproved' I'll use that instead. Either way, the claims that no plane hit the Pentagon are false. At this point, the whole debate and subject of 9-11 is the very least of our problems. The rest of the house of cards is coming down... soon. http://mingle2.com/topic/show/335390 This is your topic, right?

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 08/31/12 02:18 PM
The word "debunked" is over used. If someone presents an opinion and what they think is "evidence" they claim they "debunked" something. Is this your latest tactic? If you prefer 'disproved' I'll use that instead. Either way, the claims that no plane hit the Pentagon are false. At this point, the whole debate and subject of 9-11 is the very least of our problems. The rest of the house of cards is coming down... soon. http://mingle2.com/topic/show/335390 This is your topic, right? I mean to say that this thread is dead now, unless you defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory just want to talk amongst yourselves. I have said everything I need to say to you guys. We, in America have much much bigger problems.

HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Fri 08/31/12 02:21 PM Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Fri 08/31/12 02:23 PM
The word "debunked" is over used. If someone presents an opinion and what they think is "evidence" they claim they "debunked" something. Is this your latest tactic? If you prefer 'disproved' I'll use that instead. Either way, the claims that no plane hit the Pentagon are false. At this point, the whole debate and subject of 9-11 is the very least of our problems. The rest of the house of cards is coming down... soon. http://mingle2.com/topic/show/335390 This is your topic, right? I mean to say that this thread is dead now, unless you defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory just want to talk amongst yourselves. I have said everything I need to say to you guys. We, in America have much much bigger problems. So, head in the sand time, eh? Fingers in ears singing, lalalalalala? You're right though, this thread is dead. I proved the flight existed, thus endeth the thread.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 08/31/12 03:28 PM
No my head is never "in the sand." That would describe you. I know the reason for 9-11. Business is business. And 9-11 was REAL GOOD FOR BUSINESS.

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Fri 08/31/12 06:43 PM
No my head is never "in the sand." That would describe you. I know the reason for 9-11. Business is business. And 9-11 was REAL GOOD FOR BUSINESS. so do we... 19 pissed off muslims hijacked 4 planes and flew 3 of them into buildings...

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Fri 08/31/12 09:06 PM Edited by Jeanniebean on Fri 08/31/12 09:06 PM
No my head is never "in the sand." That would describe you. I know the reason for 9-11. Business is business. And 9-11 was REAL GOOD FOR BUSINESS. so do we... 19 pissed off muslims hijacked 4 planes and flew 3 of them into buildings... That is not a reason. That is an unsupported CONSPIRACY theory. The REASON is: BUSINESS IS BUSINESS.

HotRodDeluxe Joined Sun 05/06/12 Posts: 2743	Sun 09/02/12 04:21 AM
No my head is never "in the sand." That would describe you.