Topic: Castro & the Communist Conspiracy that Killed JFK Canada Fr
smart2009's photo
Sun 08/05/12 02:55 AM
“Still it cried, ‘Sleep no more!’ to all the house: ‘Glamis hath murder’d sleep, and therefore Cawdor Shall sleep no more, Macbeth shall sleep no more.’” - Wm Shakespeare, Macbeth II. ii. 53-55
Cliff Kincaid’s recent article about the JFK assassination is well worth a thoughtful reading. If nothing else it will certainly arouse the naysayer’sand deniers. Let us have it out once and for all on this subject and pursue where evidence takes us.
If the Kennedy Assassination was settled history, there would not still be such outcry and disbelief in the general public. The whole truth is still out there. Two thingsare certain: PresidentKennedy was killed by a Communist Assassin, and, America has not beenthe same since this happened. It was a deft stroke by the International Communist movement against American Constitutionalism and Exceptionalism. Ironically, instead of expelling this Left-Ideology from our shores and our culture, we have allowed it to flourish.
I have many sympathies with Cliff Kincaid’s report. I have reviewed much of what he reports over the years, but I am no studied expert. Rather, I am simply a casual and informed observer. The body of evidenceis intriguing and all but obvious on the surface. But what liesunderneath? The International Communist movement is famous for doing the outrageous. They do it, then they deny it, then project the deedonto others, and slink back under theirrock. The Left Media wanted America to think the assassination deed was done by the American Right. ThenOswald’s Communist connections came out ... most unfortunate for the Liberals.
Oswald’s connectionswith the Soviet Union and Cuba wereundeniable. Should we instead believe the denials of the inveterate, unmitigated, lying communist tyrants? Incredibly [at least tome] I have even heard it suggested instead that the Texan Vice President, LBJ had Kennedy eliminated. Obama might act like this type of thug perhaps,but LBJ? ... never. If he wanted to get rid of JFK there were more salacious scandals to expose and ruin the man andLBJ knew where all ofthe skeletons of bothparties were buried. LBJ was a role model for Dallas’ J.R. Ewing.
Most Kennedy Assassination investigations head initially down the road of accusing the Right of wicked Fascist-Conservative deeds, but even the most crudely prepared political philosophy student knows that Fascism and Conservatism arepolar opposites. Failing this effort, they then conclude that Lee Harvey Oswald was a “lone wolf” with scarce mention of his extensive communistties. Is not “lone wolf” a favorite term these days as well? Did not Janet Napolitano warn America of “lone wolfterrorists” among returning war veterans early in her tenure in a Federal Government Document? Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords’ shooter was eagerly misreported by the Media as most assuredly being someRight-wing nut, until the Leftist Looney perpetrator was apprehended and identified. You get the point. The smear lives on but the Left-media never apologizes for their slander and libel ... the entire Left slinks away, the unapologetically “move on.”
Some truth: John Kennedy was a Liberal, but he was also a rock-ribbed American Patriot. John Kennedy and Barry Goldwater were amicable Senate colleagues. They had talked together of some daydebating one another as presidential candidates in such a way as to show clearly the two visions to Americans. Imagine what a civil and erudite discussion of ideas and contrasts of Liberal-Conservative we might have had in 1964 had Goldwater run against Kennedy. Instead LBJ would not debate Barry Goldwater and LBJ chose to smear him with Bill Moyer’s vicious “Daisy Commercial” on TV, and and others with racial themes and innuendo.
Today, continuing in the LBJ Tradition, smear, innuendo, and slurs are stock and trade of the Modern Progressive Democrat Party! The despicable Left led bythe likes of the OliverStone smear-machine, and others, still come up with even more fanciful Right-wing Conspiracies in the FBI, CIA and plotting by evil “Kennedy-haters,” and “grassy knoll” shooters ... ya-da ya-da. We of the GOP: the “stupid” but peaceful Party. They: the Party of the1968 Leftist and Race riots, with a continued legacy down to and including modern anarchists and the#OWS Movement. Whenever we have Progressives in the Presidency[ FDR, LBJ, JEC, BHO] there is bitter division and mean politics from the Left aimed at the Right. Judge for yourselves. This Left-wing hatred of Republicans and Conservative Democrats is the poison that gives riseto Class and Racial Warfare in America. It is the raison d’être of the Revolutionary Left. How can it not lead to violence and assassination?
I believe that Mr. Kincaid is onto something worth pursuing. The proof is in the pudding. The Left does not change. They are still trying to cover up their evil deeds. Consider 1968, when Sirhan Sirhan killed RFK. The SDS supported Palestinian causes and anti-Semitism strongly even then. That anti-democratic communist, and unrepentant terroristdynamic duo, Bernadine Dohrn andBill Ayers, still spout this very same anti-Israel garbage and Communist ideology, even as they bundle money for Obama’s re-election. Did anyone really ever investigate investigate the Ayers-Dohrn SDS connections to Islamic terrorists in the late 1960s and early 70s with an eye towards prosecution for terrorism, sedition, or possible treason during wartime? Of course not. And some still wonder why no one will truly investigate Mr. Obama’s skeletons either. I vividly Remember the German Baader-Meinhof Gang, Black Septembrists [ever notice how the Islamists conduct their rampages in September?] and dead Israelis in Germany when stationed in Nurnberg in in 1972. Do we honestly thinkthat that movement was isolated and thatit ended? Dream on.
Terrorists like Dohrn and Ayers can hide these days behind a tenured professorship or by writing children’s books. Jane Fonda hides behind her divaexercise videos. This all needs to stop. For how much longer, and why, do we continue to play this charade of protectingFidel and Raul Castro,and worshipping at the altar of that Cuban Gulag-butcher,Che Guevara? How long do we persecutefriends in Honduras and Columbia while playing footsy with dictators like Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua and leaders of Bolivia, Venezuela, Brazil and Argentina?Why do domestic terrorists and seditionists and traitors get the free run of the house in America to profit from their evil deeds? This has nothing to do with “their” free speech. “Their” free speech ispreaching the overthrow of our Constitutional form of government and replacing it with a Communist or Socialist one. That is not free speech, that is sedition. As long has we continue to buy into the nonsensical Leftist-romantic mythology about Communism and their stinking ideological thinking as being co-equal or morally equivalent totraditional Constitutional Republicanism, then we are doomed to a continued downwardspiral toward serfdom in the United States. They will still be tenured and rich. You will be poor and in a re-education camp.
Perhaps in the biggerpicture of that era, the truth was papered over in 1963in order to prevent such public outrage as might spark a direct regional or global war/confrontation with Communist expansionism. I was only 14 at the time, but I remember the table talk and the news broadcasts of the day. It was a possibility. But why continue to coddle that devil in Havana and all of his Communist cronies here and abroad almost fifty years later? Now is the time to get the truth out.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/47884

smart2009's photo
Sun 08/05/12 03:02 AM
Nina Rhodes-Hughes agrees, if called, to testify about a second shooter
Rhodes-Hughes: Sirhan Sirhan was not the only shooter in the pantry
Sirhan was the only person charged and convicted in RFK assassination
Witness says FBI altered her account of RFK shooting
Los Angeles (CNN) -- Awoman who witnessed the 1968 assassination of Robert F. Kennedy says she has agreed to testify for Sirhan Sirhan's new defenseteam.
Nina Rhodes-Hughes insists Sirhan was not the only gunman firing shots when Sen. Kennedy was murdered only a few feet away from her at a Los Angeles hotel. She says there were two guns firing from separate positions and that authorities altered her account of the crime.
"What has to come out is that there was another shooter to my right," Rhodes-Hughes has told CNN."The truth has got to be told. No more cover-ups."
As a federal court hasbeen preparing to rule on Sirhan's current legal challenge to his conviction in the Kennedy murder, Rhodes-Hughes says she has been contacted by Sirhan'slead defense lawyer, New York attorney William Pepper. "He asked me if indeed I would testify that there was another shooter and I said yes, I would," she said. Rhodes-Hughes says she has not been contacted by the California attorney general's office, which represents the other side in the Sirhan federal court case.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/08/justice/california-rfk-second-gun/index.html

no photo
Sun 08/05/12 08:16 AM


Jack Ruby (Oswald's assassin) makes a statement to reporters after he has been permitted a new trial. He says :
Everything pertaining to what's happening has never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts, of what occurred, my motives. The people had , that had so much to gain and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I'm in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world.