100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Judge nails Iran, AlQaeda for 9/11 with $6 billion penalty i | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Can anyone shed light on where the 6Billion Dollars is coming from?  Yeh, since Al Qaeda is a pure fiction invented by the CIA. And Bin Laden is dead. That judge is on drugs. The move is considered a symbolic gesture without expectation of collection of penalties for the relatives.  Symbolic of what? Lies? Propaganda in support of the official account of 9-11 that has not been proven? There is no credible evidence of any of it. If you want to understand the symbolism, talk to family members of 911 victims....Although I strongly empathize with them, they can answer your question far better than I... It was a hollow meaningless gesture in support of a atrocious lie. Very Hollow and Totally Meaningless. Sorry to have to say it but. Only In America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone shed light on where the 6Billion Dollars is coming from? Yeh, since Al Qaeda is a pure fiction invented by the CIA. And Bin Laden is dead. That judge is on drugs. The move is considered a symbolic gesture without expectation of collection of penalties for the relatives. Symbolic of what? Lies? Propaganda in support of the official account of 9-11 that has not been proven? There is no credible evidence of any of it. If you want to understand the symbolism, talk to family members of 911 victims....Although I strongly empathize with them, they can answer your question far better than I... If anyone understands symbolism it is me. It symbolizes support for a fact that has NOT been proven. Not all of the "family members" agree with the official account but most of them were paid handsomely to keep quiet about that. I empathize with them too, but I will not be manipulated with sentiment when it comes to the truth. It was a hollow meaningless gesture in support of a atrocious lie. Maybe symbolism has personal meaning to the family members, just as it does to you..Their pain and suffering is not your's to judge, that's for damn sure.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“I never was in this for the Symbolic money. I wanted accountability,” she said. “The money willnever bring back my husband, so I don’t care about it.” Ellen Saracini Why would you delibertly misquote Ellen Saracini and highlight it in bold print? Saracini said she doesn't care about the money. "I never was in this for the money. I wanted accountability," she said. "The money will never bring back my husband, so I don't care about it." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok so lets see if I have this right.
It wasn't Afghanistan that we invaded. It Wasn't Iraq that we invaded. It was Iran that we still wish to invade that did 911. I got it now. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Wed 08/01/12 01:28 PM
|
|
Can anyone shed light on where the 6Billion Dollars is coming from? Yeh, since Al Qaeda is a pure fiction invented by the CIA. And Bin Laden is dead. That judge is on drugs. The move is considered a symbolic gesture without expectation of collection of penalties for the relatives. Symbolic of what? Lies? Propaganda in support of the official account of 9-11 that has not been proven? There is no credible evidence of any of it. If you want to understand the symbolism, talk to family members of 911 victims....Although I strongly empathize with them, they can answer your question far better than I... If anyone understands symbolism it is me. It symbolizes support for a fact that has NOT been proven. Not all of the "family members" agree with the official account but most of them were paid handsomely to keep quiet about that. I empathize with them too, but I will not be manipulated with sentiment when it comes to the truth. It was a hollow meaningless gesture in support of a atrocious lie. Maybe symbolism has personal meaning to the family members, just as it does to you..Their pain and suffering is not your's to judge, that's for damn sure.... I'm not "judging" their (anyone's) pain and suffering. The point is that the judge has NO EVIDENCE to have even symbolically conducted that kind of ridiculous kangaroo court. Its a totally absurd gesture that supports the governments propaganda and lies and cover up about 9-11. It has absolutely nothing to do with my judging anyone's pain and suffering. It has nothing to do with "family members" of the victims of the false flag of 9-11 perpetrated by a Criminal Cabal, and covered up by a government corporate machine, who by the way, have no evidence that Al Qaeda or Bin Laden had anything to do with it. I said that I won't let anyone drag those kinds of sentimental and emotional manipulation tactics about the poor families - into this argument. It is not about the families "pain and suffering."  That tactic is used so often to distract people from the truth I'm really tired of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Leigh2154
on
Wed 08/01/12 01:27 PM
|
|
“I never was in this for the Symbolic money. I wanted accountability,” she said. “The money willnever bring back my husband, so I don’t care about it.” Ellen Saracini Why would you deliberately misquote Ellen Saracini and highlight it in bold print? Saracini said she doesn't care about the money. "I never was in this for the money. I wanted accountability," she said. "The money will never bring back my husband, so I don't care about it." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok so lets see if I have this right. It wasn't Afghanistan that we invaded. It Wasn't Iraq that we invaded. It was Iran that we still wish to invade that did 911. I got it now. The last of The Seven in Five |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best comment from the source of the article at.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/judge-nails-iran-al-qaeda-9-11-6-billion-penalty-lawsuit-article-1.1125347 "This is the single most stupid story I've read this year. Iran had NOTHING TO DO with 9/11, and neither did Iraq. Or Pakistan. Do you realize the 9/11 Commission had NO subpoena power? Or that the investigation into Clinton's girlfriend was better funded? It was a freaking cover-up from the word go. IRAN? You have got to be putting me on. That is deep-dish delusional thinking. " Kangaroo courts are a joke. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone shed light on where the 6Billion Dollars is coming from? Yeh, since Al Qaeda is a pure fiction invented by the CIA. And Bin Laden is dead. That judge is on drugs. The move is considered a symbolic gesture without expectation of collection of penalties for the relatives. Symbolic of what? Lies? Propaganda in support of the official account of 9-11 that has not been proven? There is no credible evidence of any of it. If you want to understand the symbolism, talk to family members of 911 victims....Although I strongly empathize with them, they can answer your question far better than I... If anyone understands symbolism it is me. It symbolizes support for a fact that has NOT been proven. Not all of the "family members" agree with the official account but most of them were paid handsomely to keep quiet about that. I empathize with them too, but I will not be manipulated with sentiment when it comes to the truth. It was a hollow meaningless gesture in support of a atrocious lie. Maybe symbolism has personal meaning to the family members, just as it does to you..Their pain and suffering is not your's to judge, that's for damn sure.... I'm not "judging" their (anyone's) pain and suffering. The point is that the judge has NO EVIDENCE to have even symbolically conducted that kind of ridiculous kangaroo court. Its a totally absurd gesture that supports the governments propaganda and lies and cover up about 9-11. It has absolutely nothing to do with my judging anyone's pain and suffering. It has nothing to do with "family members" of the victims of the false flag of 9-11 perpetrated by a Criminal Cabal, and covered up by a government corporate machine, who by the way, have no evidence that Al Qaeda or Bin Laden had anything to do with it. I said that I won't let anyone drag those kinds of sentimental and emotional manipulation tactics about the poor families - into this argument. It is not about the families "pain and suffering." That tactic is used so often to distract people from the truth I'm really tired of it. You have yet to prove any of the things you allege Jean...IMO nothing you claim is true and my opinion is just as valid as yours...What makes what you are doing any less propagandic than what you accuse Maas of doing?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I heard it was the A-rabs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I heard it was the A-rabs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would be far more impressed if it were a jury trial.
I am wondering if Iran was able to defend itself and present evidence for or against? I will assume "no" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone shed light on where the 6Billion Dollars is coming from? Yeh, since Al Qaeda is a pure fiction invented by the CIA. And Bin Laden is dead. That judge is on drugs. The move is considered a symbolic gesture without expectation of collection of penalties for the relatives. Symbolic of what? Lies? Propaganda in support of the official account of 9-11 that has not been proven? There is no credible evidence of any of it. If you want to understand the symbolism, talk to family members of 911 victims....Although I strongly empathize with them, they can answer your question far better than I... If anyone understands symbolism it is me. It symbolizes support for a fact that has NOT been proven. Not all of the "family members" agree with the official account but most of them were paid handsomely to keep quiet about that. I empathize with them too, but I will not be manipulated with sentiment when it comes to the truth. It was a hollow meaningless gesture in support of a atrocious lie. Maybe symbolism has personal meaning to the family members, just as it does to you..Their pain and suffering is not your's to judge, that's for damn sure.... I'm not "judging" their (anyone's) pain and suffering. The point is that the judge has NO EVIDENCE to have even symbolically conducted that kind of ridiculous kangaroo court. Its a totally absurd gesture that supports the governments propaganda and lies and cover up about 9-11. It has absolutely nothing to do with my judging anyone's pain and suffering. It has nothing to do with "family members" of the victims of the false flag of 9-11 perpetrated by a Criminal Cabal, and covered up by a government corporate machine, who by the way, have no evidence that Al Qaeda or Bin Laden had anything to do with it. I said that I won't let anyone drag those kinds of sentimental and emotional manipulation tactics about the poor families - into this argument. It is not about the families "pain and suffering." That tactic is used so often to distract people from the truth I'm really tired of it. You have yet to prove any of the things you allege Jean...IMO nothing you claim is true and my opinion is just as valid as yours...What makes what you are doing any less propagandic than what you accuse Maas of doing?? It is not my concern what others believe. I am well aware that people will only hear what they want to hear, see what they want to see, and will reject anything they don't want to believe no matter how much time I spend explaining to them why I have reached my conclusions. What makes what I am doing "less propagandic" is that I believe whole what I am saying and I have a right to say it. What makes what the judge did wrong is that he is a judge and he should know better. There is no evidence. He is a puppet. He works for the corporation. He may even believe what he said, but I doubt it. As a judge he KNOWS there is no evidence. Yet he did it anyway. Shame on him. I have lost my faith in the corporate courts long time ago but that is the cherry on top of the ridiculi. New words in this post: (rediculi: = Ridiculous stuff.) (propagandic) = the nature of the lie and its intention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For some odd reason I keep thinking of Saddams trial.
The one that wasn't on TV. I bet it would have been far more interesting than Judge Judy's show. All the poor public saw was the verdict. Funny how the most important issues of the day are never really discussed in our corporate media. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For some odd reason I keep thinking of Saddams trial. The one that wasn't on TV. I bet it would have been far more interesting than Judge Judy's show. All the poor public saw was the verdict. Funny how the most important issues of the day are never really discussed in our corporate media. Ask David Rockefeller  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For some odd reason I keep thinking of Saddams trial. The one that wasn't on TV. I bet it would have been far more interesting than Judge Judy's show. All the poor public saw was the verdict. Funny how the most important issues of the day are never really discussed in our corporate media. Ask David Rockefeller The trials we are allowed to watch involve meth heads, trailer trash,white trash etc etc. Lets see the trial of the man that caused this country go to war and bankrupt itself in the process. Didn't happen did it? If one needs more proof our media is as guilty as the government I do not know what it would be. |
|
|
|
|
