Topic: United States of Europe | |
---|---|
It is the rallying cry of Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel as she points to what she thinks is the way out of the euro mire.
The proposals are: • More European power to determine the economic and tax policies of the member states. There should be a "transfer of sovereignty" to the European centre • A strengthening of the EU's "foreign office", with a common European foreign and security policy • A smaller European Commission able to make decisions faster • A bigger role for the European Parliament to make "stronger democratic legitimacy" • A directly elected President of Europe • A European army |
|
|
|
It is the rallying cry of Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel as she points to what she thinks is the way out of the euro mire. The proposals are: • More European power to determine the economic and tax policies of the member states. There should be a "transfer of sovereignty" to the European centre • A strengthening of the EU's "foreign office", with a common European foreign and security policy • A smaller European Commission able to make decisions faster • A bigger role for the European Parliament to make "stronger democratic legitimacy" • A directly elected President of Europe • A European army Well, most of it makes sense really. Nations aren't being compelled to relinquish their sovereignty and it will encourage co-operation which will eventually erase the prejudices that have marred most of European history. Point A makes sense, especially for the nations that are bailing out the other nations with lax tax collection and unenforced laws. Point B also makes sense as it would give the EU greater bargaining power in the international arena. Furthermore, it would not need NATO to ensure stability among the members. Point C is a step in the right direction for, as everyone knows, Brussels is bogged down with its own bureaucracy. Point D will be difficult to bring members on board. I think that one will fail. Point E is unnecessary, with the exception of being a figurehead, or speaker/chairman for the European Parliament. Point F is necessary if one considers point B. |
|
|
|
It is the rallying cry of Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel as she points to what she thinks is the way out of the euro mire. The proposals are: • More European power to determine the economic and tax policies of the member states. There should be a "transfer of sovereignty" to the European centre • A strengthening of the EU's "foreign office", with a common European foreign and security policy • A smaller European Commission able to make decisions faster • A bigger role for the European Parliament to make "stronger democratic legitimacy" • A directly elected President of Europe • A European army Well, most of it makes sense really. Nations aren't being compelled to relinquish their sovereignty and it will encourage co-operation which will eventually erase the prejudices that have marred most of European history. Point A makes sense, especially for the nations that are bailing out the other nations with lax tax collection and unenforced laws. Point B also makes sense as it would give the EU greater bargaining power in the international arena. Furthermore, it would not need NATO to ensure stability among the members. Point C is a step in the right direction for, as everyone knows, Brussels is bogged down with its own bureaucracy. Point D will be difficult to bring members on board. I think that one will fail. Point E is unnecessary, with the exception of being a figurehead, or speaker/chairman for the European Parliament. Point F is necessary if one considers point B. You are growing on me by the minute. ![]() ![]() As Long As Tony Blair doesn't fill Point E that's fine with me. If the UK joins The EU monetary Union Then Europe would be a serious entity. Just one Question? Where would this entity fit in The The Overall Globalist Plan |
|
|
|
Just one Question?
Where would this entity fit in The The Overall Globalist Plan I don't believe the 'Globalist Cabal' actually exists. |
|
|
|
Just one Question?
Where would this entity fit in The The Overall Globalist Plan I don't believe the 'Globalist Cabal' actually exists. Same here... ![]() |
|
|
|
I can't think of a better way to feed the German superiority complex than this..
I find it quite interesting that there are some in Europe so willing to bow down to the Germans once again.. It seems their post ww2 plan is about to come to fruition. |
|
|
|
I can't think of a better way to feed the German superiority complex than this.. I find it quite interesting that there are some in Europe so willing to bow down to the Germans once again.. It seems their post ww2 plan is about to come to fruition. German Superiority Complex? Bow Down to The Germans? You will have to educate me with regard to The German post WW2 plan |
|
|
|
I can't think of a better way to feed the German superiority complex than this.. I find it quite interesting that there are some in Europe so willing to bow down to the Germans once again.. It seems their post ww2 plan is about to come to fruition. German Superiority Complex? Bow Down to The Germans? You will have to educate me with regard to The German post WW2 plan The German plan after the war was to publicly disavow controlling Europe militarily (perception of reconciliation) and set up the mechanisms to control it economically. Have to say it has worked rather well.. |
|
|
|
It is the rallying cry of Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel as she points to what she thinks is the way out of the euro mire. The proposals are: • More European power to determine the economic and tax policies of the member states. There should be a "transfer of sovereignty" to the European centre • A strengthening of the EU's "foreign office", with a common European foreign and security policy • A smaller European Commission able to make decisions faster • A bigger role for the European Parliament to make "stronger democratic legitimacy" • A directly elected President of Europe • A European army Well, most of it makes sense really. Nations aren't being compelled to relinquish their sovereignty and it will encourage co-operation which will eventually erase the prejudices that have marred most of European history. Point A makes sense, especially for the nations that are bailing out the other nations with lax tax collection and unenforced laws. Point B also makes sense as it would give the EU greater bargaining power in the international arena. Furthermore, it would not need NATO to ensure stability among the members. Point C is a step in the right direction for, as everyone knows, Brussels is bogged down with its own bureaucracy. Point D will be difficult to bring members on board. I think that one will fail. Point E is unnecessary, with the exception of being a figurehead, or speaker/chairman for the European Parliament. Point F is necessary if one considers point B. You are growing on me by the minute. ![]() ![]() As Long As Tony Blair doesn't fill Point E that's fine with me. If the UK joins The EU monetary Union Then Europe would be a serious entity. Just one Question? Where would this entity fit in The The Overall Globalist Plan We would have to ask Jenyb on that. ![]() |
|
|
|
Just one Question?
Where would this entity fit in The The Overall Globalist Plan I don't believe the 'Globalist Cabal' actually exists. Well, we are heading down that road of Globalization very fast so they must be somewhere ![]() Who Are The Globalists? Simply put, the globalist movement is an alliance based on self-interest of the private international financiers and the royal, dynastic and hereditary land owning families of Britain, Europe and America which over the years have intermarried to create a self regenerating power structure that through lies and deception seeks to control everything and everyone on earth. Through their control of the ability to create money, they are able to exercise control over all the power centers of society including the corporations, the media, culture creation, the educational system, the historical societies, the political system, the military, religion, foundations and other NGOs, medicine, and law. Over time they have extended their network of control to include elites from countries all over the world working towards the same end. |
|
|