Topic: When is a Terrorist not a Terrorist | |
---|---|
Answer: When he or she is an Israeli Mossad agent or asset.
http://www.redress.cc/americas/ahart20120116 |
|
|
|
That is serious stuff!! We are in very dangerous times... on the brink of world war III.
People should read this article. |
|
|
|
Alan Hart.
Isn't he the same fellow who had an argument to impeach Barry? How will liberals grasp, the same man who wants to have their savior impeached, could be any kind of reliable in his facts? |
|
|
|
Alan Hart. Isn't he the same fellow who had an argument to impeach Barry? How will liberals grasp, the same man who wants to have their savior impeached, could be any kind of reliable in his facts? Read The Article..... ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sun 01/15/12 07:25 PM
|
|
I did.
I even saw the movie. CIA has a target. They want to draw out the target. They steal a mans identity. They make all kinds of threats of terrorism and CIA blows up an empty barracks with a few, already dead troops, to make it look like a real terrorist bombing. They didn't mean for the mark to get wasted but, he did. They called him collateral damage. CIA knows the "real" terror boss has a big ego and doesn't like being shown up. After the play, he shows his hand. They did arrest their alleged terrorist. |
|
|
|
I did. Just wondering ...you commented on the writer only... |
|
|
|
Alan Hart. Isn't he the same fellow who had an argument to impeach Barry? How will liberals grasp, the same man who wants to have their savior impeached, could be any kind of reliable in his facts? You don't know what is going on if you are still using terms like "the liberals." ![]() ![]() We are talking about world war III and the Zionist Lobby who effects all parties and politics and you are still in some little name calling squabble between two imagined groups called "liberals and conservatives." That is just a way to distract Americans away from the Zionist threat that has a strangle hold on our entire country. |
|
|
|
Alan Hart. Isn't he the same fellow who had an argument to impeach Barry? How will liberals grasp, the same man who wants to have their savior impeached, could be any kind of reliable in his facts? You don't know what is going on if you are still using terms like "the liberals." ![]() ![]() We are talking about world war III and the Zionist Lobby who effects all parties and politics and you are still in some little name calling squabble between two imagined groups called "liberals and conservatives." That is just a way to distract Americans away from the Zionist threat that has a strangle hold on our entire country. Progressive liberals love their savior, Hussein, and anyone who comes out against him, as did Hart, won't be viewed as credible. |
|
|
|
Alan Hart. Isn't he the same fellow who had an argument to impeach Barry? How will liberals grasp, the same man who wants to have their savior impeached, could be any kind of reliable in his facts? You don't know what is going on if you are still using terms like "the liberals." ![]() ![]() We are talking about world war III and the Zionist Lobby who effects all parties and politics and you are still in some little name calling squabble between two imagined groups called "liberals and conservatives." That is just a way to distract Americans away from the Zionist threat that has a strangle hold on our entire country. Progressive liberals love their savior, Hussein, and anyone who comes out against him, as did Hart, won't be viewed as credible. Only by certain people who don't support him. News is news and truth is truth. If you scoff at news just because you don't like the messenger you are turning a blind eye. |
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sun 01/15/12 07:45 PM
|
|
Alan Hart. Isn't he the same fellow who had an argument to impeach Barry? How will liberals grasp, the same man who wants to have their savior impeached, could be any kind of reliable in his facts? You don't know what is going on if you are still using terms like "the liberals." ![]() ![]() We are talking about world war III and the Zionist Lobby who effects all parties and politics and you are still in some little name calling squabble between two imagined groups called "liberals and conservatives." That is just a way to distract Americans away from the Zionist threat that has a strangle hold on our entire country. Progressive liberals love their savior, Hussein, and anyone who comes out against him, as did Hart, won't be viewed as credible. Only by certain people who don't support him. News is news and truth is truth. If you scoff at news just because you don't like the messenger you are turning a blind eye. In his article, he quotes Intelligence sources. Those sources are well known for feeding false info. Hurt could be being played and manipulated. Hurt claiming Hussein needs to be impeached is, as far as i see it, not in support of him. He's brought up valid arguments for impeachment. Did you vote Barry? If you did, will you vote for him again? __________________________________________________________________ Hart; Never before has an American President’s fear of offending the Zionist lobby and its stooges in Congress been so exposed as it was by Obama’s decision to veto the Security Council resolution condemning continued, illegal Israeli settlement activities on the occupied West Bank and demanding that Israel “immediately and completely cease” all such activities. In a different America – an informed America – some might think, I do, that Obama should be impeached. The charge? TREASON. |
|
|
|
The article is not about Alan Hart or for that matter Obama.
It is about the Zionist influence on The Government of America and what Israel can get away with. Israel is a danger to ME peace. |
|
|
|
The article is not about Alan Hart or for that matter Obama. It is about the Zionist influence on The Government of America and what Israel can get away with. Israel is a danger to ME peace. It strange how people can read the same article and get such a different take on it. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
When they're dead ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sun 01/15/12 08:25 PM
|
|
When they're dead ![]() No, wrong answer. You failed the test. Its when they work for Mossad or the CIA or any other COMPANY sponsored assassination network. |
|
|
|
When they're dead ![]() No, wrong answer. You failed the test. Its when they work for Mossad. I guess it depends on whether a silly liberal is answering or not ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Optomistic69
on
Sun 01/15/12 08:32 PM
|
|
When they're dead ![]() No, wrong answer. You failed the test. Its when they work for Mossad. I guess it depends on whether a silly liberal is answering or not ![]() In The Eyes of Zionists there is no difference between one political party or another. I would have thought that anybody interested in politics would have grasped this by now... ![]() |
|
|
|
When they're dead ![]() No, wrong answer. You failed the test. Its when they work for Mossad. I guess it depends on whether a silly liberal is answering or not ![]() In The Eyes of Zionists there is no difference between one political party or another. I would have thought that anybody interested in politics would have grasped this by now... ![]() Most people involved in politics are caught up in the game and that can't grasp anything. |
|
|