http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/smartpolitics/2011/12/snubbed_again_ron_paul_surges.php


Snubbed Again: Ron Paul Surges in Iowa and the Media Yawns
By Eric Ostermeier on December 5, 2011


Despite rising to 2nd place in the new Des Moines Register survey, Paul gets just 5 percent of coverage in reporting on the poll - the same level as Santorum, Perry, and Bachmann

While Newt Gingrich deservedly received the lion's share of attention borne out of a recent Des Moines Register Iowa Poll that found him emerge as the top preference of likely caucus-goers one month out, the Ron Paul camp must be wondering what it has to do in the Hawkeye State to get noticed.

Paul's support in the new poll increased 50 percent from the organization's last poll conducted a month ago - from 12 percent to 18 percent - and leapfrogged Mitt Romney (at 16 percent) along the way.

Gingrich's numbers more than tripled from seven to 25 percent.

Representative Paul, however, did not simply take a back seat in coverage on the new survey to the former House Speaker, but he also trailed Romney and ex-candidate Herman Cain by a wide margin.

Paul languished with the bottom-tier candidates in the race - all equally starved for media attention.

A Smart Politics content analysis of nearly two-dozen reports written on the Des Moines Register poll by prominent national news outlets finds that coverage of the poll's second place finisher Ron Paul accounted for just 5 percent of these articles - about one-quarter the attention received by Mitt Romney (20.1 percent) and the same as bottom-tier candidates Rick Santorum, Michele Bachmann, and Rick Perry.

Media reports on the new Iowa Poll analyzed for this study were written by ABC News, Associated Press, Bloomberg, Business Insider, CBS News, Christian Science Monitor, CNN, Daily Beast, The Hill, Huffington Post, Los Angeles Times, MSNBC, National Review, National Journal, New York Post, New York Times, POLITICO, Reuters, Slate, USA Today, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and the Washington Times.

These 23 news outlets wrote 8,816 words on the Des Moines Register poll in their initial reporting, with attention on Gingrich receiving the plurality of the coverage at 2,807 words (31.8 percent).

Although Representative Paul was second in the survey, coverage of his campaign and his standing in the Iowa poll tallied just 464 words, or 5.3 percent of these reports.

That was approximately one-quarter of the amount of attention received by Mitt Romney in these two-dozen reports, with the former Massachusetts governor notching 1,773 words or 20.1 percent of the coverage.

Even Herman Cain, soon to be a footnote in the Iowa race, was discussed at more than twice that of Paul at 1,130 words, or 12.8 percent.

Paul received approximately the same amount of media coverage as Rick Santorum (463 words, 5.3 percent), Michele Bachmann (434 words, 4.9 percent), and Rick Perry 433 words, (4.9 percent).

In the Des Moines Register survey, Paul polled with nearly as much support as Bachmann (8 percent), Perry (6 percent), and Santorum (6 percent) combined.

GOP Candidate Coverage in Prominent Media Outlet Reporting on the Des Moines Register Poll Results

Candidate Words Percent
Newt Gingrich 2,807 31.8
Mitt Romney 1,773 20.1
Herman Cain 1,130 12.8
Ron Paul 464 5.3
Rick Santorum 463 5.3
Michele Bachmann 434 4.9
Rick Perry 433 4.9
Jon Huntsman 158 1.8
Other 1,154 13.1
Total 8,816 100.0

Reports analyzed at ABC News, the Associated Press, Bloomberg, Business Insider, CBS News, Christian Science Monitor, CNN, Daily Beast, The Hill, Huffington Post, Los Angeles Times, MSNBC, National Review, National Journal, New York Post, New York Times, POLITICO, Reuters, Slate, USA Today, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and the Washington Times. Table compiled by Smart Politics.
Most of the information in these reports that did discuss Representative Paul were short, straight-forward recitations of his poll results with little analysis of his campaign going forward:

"Texas Rep. Ron Paul has risen into second place...Paul is at 18%." - USA Today

"Texas Rep. Ron Paul placed second with 18 percent." - Washington Times


"...followed by Ron Paul... while Texas congressman Paul had 18 percent." - Associated Press (via Yahoo!)


"With Ron Paul at 18 percent." - POLITICO

Only five of the 23 media outlets devoted at least 10 percent of their coverage of the Iowa poll results to Paul, led by National Review (30.8 percent), Business Insider (20.1 percent), Christian Science Monitor (12.6 percent), Washington Post (11.1 percent), and the New York Times (10.5 percent).

Another 14 outlets spent less than 5 percent of their reporting on the poll on the Texas congressman.

Despite Paul's surge in Iowa, some of these outlets that wrote more than one sentence about the Texas Congressman were quick to diminish his candidacy, with the Christian Science Monitor calling Paul a "libertarian outlier."

Of course, it is understandable the Gingrich vs. Romney storyline would dominate the overall arc of the coverage, given their 1-2 position on the national scene.

However, in a story about Iowans and the caucuses where Paul is positioned to contend, and not about the national race or matchups against the president (Barack Obama was mentioned just nine times in these 20+ reports), it is curious that Paul was not discussed more.

The headlines of these two-dozen reports also tell a similar tale.

With Gingrich mentioned in each of the headlines of these 23 reports, Romney was mentioned in seven and Paul just four.

Bachmann, Perry, and Cain were all mentioned in one headline.

Romney also crushes Paul in terms of the number of times each is mentioned by name or occupation in the body of the articles - more than doubling up on him.

Gingrich was mentioned by name or occupation 134 times in these reports (29.4 percent) followed by Romney at 103 mentions (22.6 percent), Cain at 76 (16.7 percent), and Paul at just 45 (9.9 percent).

Paul's coverage was much closer to that of the bottom tier of Iowa hopefuls - Perry at 28 mentions (6.1 percent), Bachmann and Santorum at 27 each (5.9 percent), and Huntsman at 16 (3.5 percent) than the top tier in which his poll numbers reside.

It should be noted that while the vast majority of media outlets only made passing reference to Paul's numbers, a few outlets wrote at least one substantive sentence about the Texas Congressman and his strong organization in the Hawkeye State. For example:

"That is one area where Mr. Paul is considered strong, and it could help in drawing his supporters out to vote the night of the caucuses." - New York Times

"Probably the most interesting numbers here are Paul's, which suggest that he could well win the Iowa caucuses (he is also considered to have a great on the ground organization in the state)." - National Review


"Ron Paul is the most organized candidate in the state, as reflected by his strong poll showing. Unlike Romney, he has momentum in the polls -- suggesting that if Gingrich's lead collapses, he stands a strong chance of winning the caucuses." - Business Insider


"The poll is also notable for the rise of Paul, who has emerged as a major player in Iowa." - Washington Post

Yep.
MSM wants to sell the folks more junk.

Yeah, a blatant disregard, perhaps they'll sing a different tune soon.

Screw the Company owned media.

Promote Ron Paul via the Internet.

Ron Paul needs to run as an Independent Third Party Candidate!

could split the Vote sufficiently to give the Incumbent a Second Term!

That has always been the propaganda to get people to NOT vote for a third party candidate.

If people would ignore that and just vote for who they really want then I think that would really shake things up.