In building a house, we all know that it must have a solid foundation.

You can have a beautiful house, but if it is built on a foundation of sand, it will eventually crumble no matter how well it is built or how good it looks.

Symbolically, our lives are the same If your life is built on a foundation of lies and broken promises, you can't build the rest of your life around that unless and until you come clean.

In being true, I think you should begin by being true to yourself, then vow to be true and honest to those close to you. That would be your friends and family.

I am referring to Herman Cain.

A liar and cheater at home is a lair and cheater in life.

If you spend your life building it on sand, know that eventually it will come falling down, just like Herman Cain's.

Karma is a beeitch.

Be as true as you can.

HA HA, never saw this post but see that we think alike on cheaters LOL

well, obama is a liar too, but i guess it is ok for him...or is it because he's not a cheater?

All politicians are probably liars, but a man who betrays the trust of his wife and cheats and lies, is certainly not to be trusted.

I am not aware of what Obama has lied about, although I don't listen to him that much.

I agree. I hear some say that they don't care about a candidate's sex life, but I do if it involves lying to the person he made a vow to.

thats easy... just look at his campaign promises, and what he's actually done...

so i take it matters what they lie about?... a liar is a liar is a liar... lying to one person is worse than lying to millions?

Don't be stupid.

I don't even like Obama. Of course, he lied and I am not voting for him. But, she was specifically talking about the lies Herman Cain told.

ok, i'll try not to be too stupid... but it is hard

I don't know any president who has kept his promises. If you get in there and congress vetoes everything you try to do like they do to Obama, well, the president does not have very much power to do much does he?

I am specifically talking about a betrayal of trust. The breaking of a vow or promise as in marriage.

If a president, (George Bush for example) takes a vow as president to protect and defend the constitution then passes the patriot act that totally trumps our rights, then that is the breaking of a trust.

Thanks.

There is as yet (to my knowledge), no proof that Herman Cain cheated on his wife. If he has, I feel sorry for his family and friends. But until something definitive comes out, I'm going to continue to consider him innocent.

HE ADMITTED IT ON TELEVISION - that his wife did not know about the "friendship."

He paid her expenses for years.

If he claims she was just "a friend" I'm afraid I'm not buying it.
Why would he keep her a secret from his wife if it was innocent?

That's certainly proof enough for me.

And she claims it was an affair. She actually has no reason to lie.

He does.

No, he didn't. He ended his campaign, but he still denies any wrong doing.

Of course he does. He's a LIAR. He has no conscience. No morals. No respect for his wife.

So first you lie and say he admitted to cheating and then when I say "No he didn't", you reply by saying that's because he has no conscience, morals or respect for his wife?

I watched him admit on television that his wife did not know about his "affair/friendship" or whatever you want to call it.

If he is so "innocent" why would he keep a woman on the side, pay her expenses, and not tell his wife about it?

Really. You actually believe that?

Even if he never screwed her, he lied about it to his wife.

But she claims it was a SEXUAL AFFAIR.

I have no reason no to believe her.

Ginger White went public with her allegation of the affair, which in her version of events only ended a couple of months ago.

Read more: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/wifes-verdict-awaits-herman-cain-as-he-admits-friend-was-a-secret-16086074.html#ixzz1fWRzejWO

I don't watch TV, so I didn't see the press conference. I certainly don't approve of him keeping any relationship a secret from his wife, especially one in which he was offering financial assistance to another woman. Still, he hasn't admitted to a sexual affair, so what you posted isn't true. It does give me more to think about, but without more proof, I won't change my position.