Topic: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Get Destroyed - part 2
no photo
Thu 09/01/11 02:18 PM


The saddest part to me is the real problems that are being ignored as a result of spending time on this garbage.

:thumbsup:


What is being ignored is the truth.

Chazster's photo
Thu 09/01/11 03:55 PM
< continued from this topic >
< part one of this topic is here >
Your right. Truthers are ignoring the truth.

no photo
Thu 09/01/11 04:02 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 09/01/11 04:03 PM

Your right. Truthers are ignoring the truth.


Why do you think that?

Seriously please point out to me this glaring and proven truth that "truthers" are ignoring.

And there are many different experts involved in the truther movement. Please be very specific and not so vague and general with your statements.


Chazster's photo
Thu 09/01/11 04:03 PM
Math.. Physics... Science...

no photo
Thu 09/01/11 04:05 PM

Math.. Physics... Science...


Math, Physic, science.

That is not specific. It is vague and general.

There are many different experts involved in the truther movement. Please be very specific and not so vague and general with your statements.

Why not do a little digging in a particular area and discuss something specific? Vague statements are generalizations. They have no meaning.

Chazster's photo
Thu 09/01/11 04:09 PM
People claiming the towers shouldn't have fallen like they did. When physics dictates that they should. Metalwig a structural engineer explains lots of stuff that people just ignore. Truhers give ideas on things and no real evidence of anything. Some ideas are more realistic than others. Some are crazy. (like the building should have fallen over)

no photo
Thu 09/01/11 04:14 PM
Truhers give ideas on things and no real evidence of anything


I have posted facts and real evidence that can be backed up if you cared to actually take the time to do so.

(Its' spelled "truthers") And they will find the truth. They have exposed a lot already.


no photo
Thu 09/01/11 04:16 PM
So please point out to me this glaring and proven truth that "truthers" are ignoring.

Be specific.

Chazster's photo
Thu 09/01/11 04:22 PM
Edited by Chazster on Thu 09/01/11 05:13 PM
Lol lots of truthers are just random people with no credentials. In fact most are. You even claim yourself. Who are you? I bet metalwig could give a link to his license. I gave a good example with the building collapse. It should not "fall over". Thinking that must because a demolition implodes that there are no other ways to implode.

They forget that sound travels. There are lots of videos of the collapse. Several minutes before up until it ends. You are close enough to hear the collapsing sounds. There are no sounds of explosions. You look at any demolition video and they explosions are louder than the collapse sound. They completely ignore this and still claim demolition. The laws of physics can't stop working to explain a story.

*update* I have verified a certain someones Engineering credentials.winking

no photo
Thu 09/01/11 05:20 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 09/01/11 05:21 PM

Lol lots of truthers are just random people with no credentials. In fact most are. You even claim yourself. Who are you? I bet metalwig could give a link to his license. I gave a good example with the building collapse. It should not "fall over". Thinking that must because a demolition implodes that there are no other ways to implode.

They forget that sound travels. There are lots of videos of the collapse. Several minutes before up until it ends. You are close enough to hear the collapsing sounds. There are no sounds of explosions. You look at any demolition video and they explosions are louder than the collapse sound. They completely ignore this and still claim demolition. The laws of physics can't stop working to explain a story.


I don't claim a formal or "traditional demolition" occured. I claim that explosives were used and were involved in the cause of the buildings to collapse. I don't believe they would have collapsed without explosives and I don't think anyone has proven that they did. All they have is a theory and an estimate of damage that they created with a computer simulation.

A building can be demolished more than one way. It can go from the top down or from the bottom up.

Who am I? I have often linked to my websites many times on this club. I don't hide who I am. My name is Gloria Jean. I am not anonymous. Google Gloria Jean and you will find one of my sites on the first page of google.

I am not a scientist, I am a (retired)investigator and an artist.
Google key words: "process service baca county" and you will find one of my pages listed.

I don't hide who I am. I'm all over the Internet.

Truthers are Not random people with no names. They do not hide who they are or their credentials. At least the ones I read are. I don't believe anything from anonymous people or pretenders.







yellowrose10's photo
Thu 09/01/11 05:37 PM
I am locking this topic. There was a general warning posted in Part 1 and the insults continued. This topic has run it's course.

Kim