The ones with the most weapons, not the most money, wins in the end.

The difference between Hugo Chavez and Pablo Escobar is that Hugo Chavez is an elected president. They have to make him look bad like they did Saddam. Or they have to incite dissension against him in his own country and try another coup.

The way they do this is to stir up trouble and blame the president, or lend support to anyone who does not like his politics. He does have enemies I'm sure.

He does allow Colombian drugs to pass through his country on their way to Europe and Africa. I'm sure he makes a lot of money on the drug trade.

It takes money to buy weapons.

So many people are seduced by them, bribed, etc. Others are blackmailed and threatened. The best thing a person can do for starters is learn about them.

Have you ever heard the phrase in movies or read in articles;

"You don't know what your're dealing with!!!"

ITS THE COMPANY.

Other things to do would be to become a little more self sufficient. I know that's not possible for most people.

Stop borrowing money. Stop using banks (almost impossible in today's society.. but use banks less.)

Grow your own food, trade and barter, etc.

If you are in a position of power, don't do anything that you could be blackmailed for. Be lily pure. Don't take bribes or compromise your integrity for wealth. Know what to look for.

You will know them by their deeds and by the rhetoric they spew.

There are plenty of weapons around that cost very little if anything at all.

Why do you think the UN and other progressive entities want to ensure their destruction.. so badly?

You think these campaigns against small arms or anti-personnel mines by the UN is because they actually care about people or is it more likely that they don't want them in certain groups hands?

He wrote the famous or infamous depending on your viewpoint book the Da Vinci Code.

The C.I.A creep me out. They could get away with anything, considering they go undercover. Granted, they are there to solve mysteries, but i often wonder how much they take advantage of their job.

They're more there to protect the interests of the elite if anything. The rest is just a cover to make them appear good.

It is difficult to judge who actually 'cares' about people. But I don't think they really care about people.

When The Company wants to overthrow or topple a government, they will make sure the opposition (the rebels) get plenty of weapons- (and even air support.)

There will always be weapons.

It was the KGB trying to make it look like the IRA.

CIA links to "terrorist" flight training

by Jerry Russell

According to some reports, the airliners that struck the WTC towers and the Pentagon were flown with exquisite skill, executing maneuvers that you might see at an aerobatic exhibition or flight show. These feats could well have been impossible for typical general aviation pilots with low flight hours. But there is reason to believe that the "terrorist" pilots could have received the very best of training, courtesy of the US government.

Various records and testimony show that two of the alleged hijackers, Mohamed Atta and Marwan Alshehri, took flight training at Rudi Dekkers' Huffman Aviation flight school in Venice, Florida. Investigator Daniel Hopsicker, following the funding trail, found that Huffman Aviation is closely linked to Brittania Aviation and Caribe Air. Brittania had no visible assets or qualifications other than its association with Caribe Air, but was awarded a massive regional service center contract by the US government. Caribe Air, in turn, has a long history of association with CIA drug-running operations out of Mena, Arkansas, and is also allegedly linked to fraudulent Enron-funded offshore investment partnerships.

Hopsicker also notes that according to reports from Newsweek, three alleged terrorist pilots trained at the Pensacola Naval Air Station in Florida, while Knight Ridder stated that suspects Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz Alomari, and Saeed Alghamdi had attended various other prestigious military exchange officer's training programs. These reports were never categorically denied by US government sources.

Certain unnamed flight instructors told Washington Post reporters that the alleged hijackers had very poor flying skills. This is self-serving testimony, considering other stories that the "suicide pilots" also had a peculiar lack of interest in landings.

Why weren't these suspicious characters reported to the proper authorities? According to their flight instructors, the "terrorists" were such terrible pilots, they probably couldn't hit the side of a mountain, much less a New York skyscraper. That's why they weren't more concerned.

But with the understanding that these flight instructors could well have been funded through CIA channels, in order to pay for the training of these pilots, it becomes clear that the "terrorists" may have had very solid flying skills indeed.

UPDATE 9/28/2002:

I have become aware of additional, well-sourced accounts detailing the poor flying skills of some of the "terrorists", especially Hani Hanjour who allegedly piloted the flight which struck the Pentagon. Also, even in the reports from Hopsicker, there is no information indicating specifically that the terrorists had aerobatic training in jet aircraft.

Rudi Dekkers

Huffman Aviation


Interview:
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/atta/interviews/dekkers.htm

Stephen Adams

Michael Farkas

Adnan Khashoggi

...the owners of the planes that became famous after being caught in Mexico running drugs, were partners, at the same time the planes were flying, in a huge $300 million financial fraud called STOCKWALK.

Richard Clarke launches new 9/11 charge at CIA

August 12, 2011 9:03 AM

(CBS News) A former White House adviser who has long criticized President George W. Bush on the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks will reportedly be featured in a documentary advancing an admittedly unsupported theory that the Central Intelligence Agency tried to turn two of the 9/11 hijackers into double agents while they resided in the United States in the years leading up to the attacks.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/08/12/national/main20091608.shtml

A CIA 9/11 Cover-Up?


The CIA’s “screw-up” explanation of its lamentable failure to act remains at best unconvincing, at worst indicative that it conceals a very different, secret scenario

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/08/12/richard-clarke-9-11-interview-was-there-a-cia-coverup.html

The Bush Family, Florida,
& The American CIA - Part 1

Rense.com:
http://www.rense.com/general5/bushfam.htm

heres their own pic wheres the impact from the wings?

look how the poles are undamaged

how did they fit the plane between them?

there is no way you could fit a plane through there


http://news.yahoo.com/photos/pentagon-memorial-1309389892-slideshow/;_ylt=AvqFTWhza5YJgN5gDvYl60ZfaP0E;_ylu=X3oDMTNoMG1hdDZzBHBrZwNlNDkxNzJmYy0wNjRmLTM5Y2EtYjFkYi1mNzQ4ZjQ5NjNmZGUEcG9zAzMEc2VjA01lZGlhRmVhdHVyZWRDYXJvdXNlbAR2ZXIDNjIxNzI0MDYtYzJkYS0xMWUwLWJiZWEtYWY4NzAxNzM5NmI2;_ylg=X3oDMTFtbjZqNHVyBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdAMEcHQDc3MtZ2FsbGVyeQR0ZXN0Aw--;_ylv=3#crsl=%252Fphotos%252Fpentagon-memorial-1309389892-slideshow%252Ffile-tenth-anniversary-september-11-20110803-082202-849.html

Volant you messed up this thread with your long link. I hate that.

The government itself had nothing to do with 9-11.
It is the greedy criminals who have infiltrated the government.
And the CIA is not a government agency. It is, as far as I
am concerned an international spy network controlled by criminals.

No! It was the DEA trying to make it look like the NRA!