100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: LUV2ROKNROLLS NUDIST CLUB!!! | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
welcome
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
gcol
on
Mon 08/29/11 05:54 PM
|
|
Txmomof2, since I am newbie, how might one 'chime-in' to welcome another newbie, or should I leave it to the 'the masters', youself & 'luv'?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well hun you can just say welcome or add your own flair to it.
Sometimes I do a simple welcome. Other times I add my own 2 cents to whatever the are talking about. And sometimes I welcome them to the insanity of Mingleland. And warn them of all the wards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
gcol
on
Mon 08/29/11 06:11 PM
|
|
well hun you can just say welcome or add your own flair to it. Sometimes I do a simple welcome. Other times I add my own 2 cents to whatever the are talking about. And sometimes I welcome them to the insanity of Mingleland. And warn them of all the wards. OK, so (here goes) "WELCOME!" Be sure to watch out for the "Hot Beer" ward, and the "Live Girls" ward, and (the ward I'm in) the "Terminally Sane" (and forced to deal with it) ward. Oh, yeah, I almost forgot--it seems everyone around here is a little bit Psycho, but I don't want to offend anyone with the "little bit" qualifier... (Saw-right? txmomof2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well hun you can just say welcome or add your own flair to it. Sometimes I do a simple welcome. Other times I add my own 2 cents to whatever the are talking about. And sometimes I welcome them to the insanity of Mingleland. And warn them of all the wards. OK, so (here goes) "WELCOME!" Be sure to watch out for the "Hot Beer" ward, and the "Live Cold Girls" ward, and (the ward I'm in) the "Terminally Sane" (and forced to deal with it) ward. Oh, yeah, I almost forgot--it seems everyone around here is a little bit Psycho, but I don't want to offend anyone with the "little bit" qualifier... (Saw-right? txmomof2)  Aren't we all just a little bit insane? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aye....there's the nugget, isn't there?
Is that fact that I'm a little insane, make me more sane than the next? Or is it the fact that Reality is for those who can't handle insanity? Or maybe even, the most sane of us must be the most insane, by definition? I prefer just to strip off, and not deal with it. That way, I have no chafing (or chafing thoughts), and a lot of breathing room (usually). And I'll never be one to share my deepest insane thoughts with anyone else. Unless, of course, they are a member... Or, perhaps a weblog buddy... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well I do share but no one seems to understand what I'm talking about
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well I do share but no one seems to understand what I'm talking about LOL!!! Yes, I know the feeling. Oh, do I. But, then, if they knew what you were talking about, would that not put you in a category with other people, and mess-with the definition of insanity (or at least your particular version thereof?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well truth be told someone is always putting people in categories with others. There is no such thing as individuality anymore. Everyone judges everyone by someone else's standards. Normal? Who is to say what normal is? Some dude with a phd sitting in a lab somewhere? I think not. Normal is what we want to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.S. Don't you dare tell anyone else I have a deep side. Or that I can actually think for myself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal is what we want to be.  Abby Normal? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal is what we want to be. WHY?????  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal is what we want to be. WHY????? Why not? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.S. Don't you dare tell anyone else I have a deep side. Or that I can actually think for myself. 1. You are now officially 'in my confidence' 2. Never, will I tell. 3. I complete agree about the categorization, thing. For, nay should any man judge another, as that is not in the purview of man -- Reason: At the time a man (or woman) makes a split second decision, they are faced with a multitude of simultaneous inputs, and more data than they can process in the time allowed. Thus, they are (by definition) forced to make a decision based on the (likely incomplete) information they have at that instant. (and, the information may change an instant later, may it not?) Thus, for some "Other" man/woman/judge(hah!)(what gave them the right?) to come back (later) and review the decisions made by another, (having not Lived through that critical time, with the coincident information available)(yet, having other (often BIASED) testimony available), the "Judge" is burden with....WHAT--- Making a "Decision" -- The SAME EXACT THING the person being 'judged' was faced with, back at the time they made their decision..... So -- if the "judge" decides that the 'decision-maker' was WRONG -- (for the split-second decision they made, under circumstances the "judge" may have never, and may never "be forced" to face....) well, to ME, that's just WRONG WRONG WRONG. How can any man/woman make a decision about another person's decision, without having been: (at least) A: Raised in similar (if not the same) environmental circumstance B: Faced with a similar (if not the same) predicament, forcing a split second-decision (after all, the "judge" gets to take his time....) So, to me "judgement" is a very slippery slope....and not in the purview of Man. And, yet, it is forced (and foisted) upon us in the name of "civilization", and remains as corrupt, and vulnerable to nepotism/etc as it always has been... Whew...I'm sorry... What just happened... It's almost like I took a big mental d*mp.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.S. Don't you dare tell anyone else I have a deep side. Or that I can actually think for myself. BTW: I love that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.S. Don't you dare tell anyone else I have a deep side. Or that I can actually think for myself. 1. You are now officially 'in my confidence' 2. Never, will I tell. 3. I complete agree about the categorization, thing. For, nay should any man judge another, as that is not in the purview of man -- Reason: At the time a man (or woman) makes a split second decision, they are faced with a multitude of simultaneous inputs, and more data than they can process in the time allowed. Thus, they are (by definition) forced to make a decision based on the (likely incomplete) information they have at that instant. (and, the information may change an instant later, may it not?) Thus, for some "Other" man/woman/judge(hah!)(what gave them the right?) to come back (later) and review the decisions made by another, (having not Lived through that critical time, with the coincident information available)(yet, having other (often BIASED) testimony available), the "Judge" is burden with....WHAT--- Making a "Decision" -- The SAME EXACT THING the person being 'judged' was faced with, back at the time they made their decision..... So -- if the "judge" decides that the 'decision-maker' was WRONG -- (for the split-second decision they made, under circumstances the "judge" may have never, and may never "be forced" to face....) well, to ME, that's just WRONG WRONG WRONG. How can any man/woman make a decision about another person's decision, without having been: (at least) A: Raised in similar (if not the same) environmental circumstance B: Faced with a similar (if not the same) predicament, forcing a split second-decision (after all, the "judge" gets to take his time....) So, to me "judgement" is a very slippery slope....and not in the purview of Man. And, yet, it is forced (and foisted) upon us in the name of "civilization", and remains as corrupt, and vulnerable to nepotism/etc as it always has been... Whew...I'm sorry... What just happened... It's almost like I took a big mental d*mp.... Glad you got that off your chest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.S. Don't you dare tell anyone else I have a deep side. Or that I can actually think for myself. BTW: I love that. What? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woe woe woe!!
So we got two guys new to the hood, eh welcome budds, wanna know the level of insanity here? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ash 
|
|
|
|
|
