Don't read too much into it. I do work smart, but the volume of work in the fields I have worked in also requires one to push your limits.

There is often a number of obstacles to overcome, especially in the restaurant business. The situation is often much, much less than ideal. One of the biggest obstacles is trying to get people to perform a task in a better, more efficient way. Often the set up requires more work initially, maybe even an investment of money by the company, and then the idea is keep it that way by simple maintenance once set up. Many workers aren't willing to suck it up in the short term to give the new system a chance to prove its value. On top of that, ownership often doesn't want to put the money in even though it will pay for itself in labor and quicker service to the customer.

This is the experience I have had. For some reason, I seem to get penalized for both working smart and working hard while those who buck improvement reap the rewards. It makes me want to start my own business, but I don't have the money to do so.

that misses the entire point but I expected as much

In my world, there would be no super-bill­ionairs with the other 99.9% clawing for survival.

We would have regular billionair­es and thriving middle class.

No offense to any super-bill­ionaires posting here today.

lol. just begs the question. when does one leave the ranks of "regular billionair" and become a "super billionair" in "your world".

im sure(not)that everybody knows that bill gates didnt invent windows

ibm came to him and he borrowed $40,000.00 from his mom and bought it

from someone you never heard of.

it seems that poor people never amount too much because when you make

something good the rich come along and well you know buy it from you.

and if it something that can benifit the world they come by and buy it

and bury it so its that it never existed in the first place.

its as if they and only them have the midas touch.

That's incorrect. He bought dos not windows.

ah crap. beat me to it.

No offence but if one has to explain that to you there realy is no point in haveing this conversation.

So unless someone can tell you how you think there is no point in having the conversation? That is what people say when they can't answer something. He even said "in your world." He was asking what "you" consider a super billionaire. Sorry if people don't automatically know what "you" think.

Seriously what does logic tell you I think?

Use deductive reasoneing I wont spell it out as if he was a moron that would be insulting and a waste of time.

It says you don't know because to give a number say 10 billion dollars would take less time than making a post saying it is a waste of time.

no offence taken. i'll just assume you can't answer the question.

George Carlin used to be funny. I watched him on Netflex the other night and he was pathetic. He is completely out of touch with the world at age 70. He's not funny anymore. He was really insulting to people who have faith in God, and I just thought he was rude.

Perhaps I've just out evolved him or out grown his negative nasty attitude. Maybe I've changed and he hasn't.

The all American dream should be called the All American challenge.

Life and the world itself is a huge challenge.

i'm retired. nothing but time to waste.