Previous 1 3
Topic: Ron Paul: Shame on him if this true.....
Dragoness's photo
Sat 05/07/11 05:57 PM
Edited by Dragoness on Sat 05/07/11 06:00 PM
Why Ron Paul’s Racist Newsletters Matter
Written by Casey Gane-McCalla, Lead Blogger on May 6, 2011 8:12 am Click for More Next Post
View Photos

Ron Paul is back in the hunt for the Presidency. Many see him as an appealing candidate, one who opposes the wars, wants drugs legalized and supports fiscal responsibility. What they don’t know, is his long history of racism and connection to white supremacists. He has dodged questions on his connections to white supremacists and the newsletters, full of abhorrent racism that he put out in his name and he made millions from, spreading racism.

There has been controversy over Ron Paul’s ties to racism for some time now. Many people have pointed to Ron Paul’s Newsletters as proof of his racism. Paul has previously admitted to writing the newsletters and defended the statements in 1996, then blamed them on an unnamed ghostwriter in 2001 and then denied any knowledge of them in 2008. He has given no explanation, for how the racism entered his newsletter and has dodged questions about them without casting blame on anyone. If we are to take Paul at his word, he is guilty of at least promoting racism on a large scale. Paul earned almost a million dollars a year from the racist, conspiracy theorist newsletters. Here are some excerpts that I’ve found.

ron paul needlin

In this story Ron Paul writes about “needlin” and blames packs of young black girls for spreading AIDS to white women. I could find no evidence of this “epidemic” and the article seems to have no point other than to make white people scared of Black people.

Ron Paul MLK

In this piece he criticizes Martin Luther King as a pro-communist philanderer and says the MLK holiday is “Hate Whitey Day.” This is in great contrast to 2008 when he told Wolf Blitzer that Martin Luther King was one of his heroes. When activists suggested naming a city after Martin Luther King Paul suggested other names such as “Welfaria,” “Zooville,” “Rapetown,” “Dirtburg,” and “Lazyopolis” He would continue:

ron paul mlk 2

In another piece he blamed Black people for the riots that happened in Chicago in 1992 after the Bulls won the NBA Championship

basket ball riots

Paul here is using false information to attack African Americans. The Washington Post reported that 1000 people were arrested but did not indicate their race. The riot, like most sports riots was multi-racial, including Blacks, white and Latinos, yet Paul used the incident to demonize African Americans. The Washington Post also reported that two officers suffered minor gunshot wounds and that 95 were injured in total, but the way Paul phrased it, it would seem most of the 95 officers injured were shot.

ron paul blast em

In this article Paul uses the “carjacking” epidemic to put fear into white people. He advises them to carry guns and shoot “carjackers” illegally and then dispose of their weapons. He also refers Black people as “animals” and directly refers to his home town of Lake Jackson, Texas.

The newsletters also contained the quotes:

opinion polls consistently show only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions

if you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be,

This is only the first skirmish in the race war of the 1990s

http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/why-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters-matter/?omcamp=NEWSBAR

_______________________________________________________

Please note the articles from the newsletters did not carry over to here so you will have to copy and paste the link

To confirm what this blogger wrote I tried to find proof that he wrote this.

This is what is going on. These are excerpt from his newsletter that he claims he didn't write but there is no lawsuit by him on whoever did put this in his newsletter so it doesn't look good on him.

He lets whoever is publishing this and worse under his name.

Shame on him.

no photo
Sat 05/07/11 06:10 PM
well, he is a Texan, isn't he?

Peccy's photo
Sat 05/07/11 06:15 PM

well, he is a Texan, isn't he?
you never cease to amaze me...........noway

yellowrose10's photo
Sat 05/07/11 06:19 PM
so because he is from Texas, he is automatically a racist? noway


A series of newsletters in the name of GOP presidential hopeful Ron Paul contain several racist remarks -- including one that says order was restored to Los Angeles after the 1992 riots when blacks went "to pick up their welfare checks."

CNN recently obtained the newsletters -- written in the 1990s and one from the late 1980s -- after a report was published about their existence in The New Republic.

None of the newsletters CNN found says who wrote them, but each was published under Paul's name between his stints as a U.S. congressman from Texas.


http://articles.cnn.com/2008-01-10/politics/paul.newsletters_1_newsletters-blacks-whites?_s=PM:POLITICS

This was all I have found basically. I don't know why he hasn't sued. Could be because he doesn't know who the source is????

no photo
Sat 05/07/11 06:20 PM
un - be- lievable

MLK was hardly a philanderer he was a courageous minister with a prominent and adoring spouse Coretta

if he has ever TALKED to young black males he would find a respectful sort IME anyway

yanno I had more courtesy the years I rode public buses and worked in warehouses than I have from many white men

the black men I worked with were taught respect - not saying the whites weren't, but quite honestly I see a slight difference in the quality of respect and it may be a function of the relatively tight knit community they lived in in the city I lived in at the time

heavenlyboy34's photo
Sat 05/07/11 06:23 PM
Edited by heavenlyboy34 on Sat 05/07/11 06:24 PM
this was brought up in 2008 too. Ron didn't write the articles, but they are often mistakenly attributed to him. Try as they might, noone has ever proved that RP wrote them.

mightymoe's photo
Sat 05/07/11 06:30 PM


well, he is a Texan, isn't he?
you never cease to amaze me...........noway


huh... i just expect it... liberals are liberals,... i'm glad he thinks bad of Texans, we don't more ignorant liberals here...

no photo
Sat 05/07/11 06:33 PM
so because he is from Texas, he is automatically a racist?
I dunno. I've never lived in Texas. All I can go on is the impression we get from what I've seen and heard.

mightymoe's photo
Sat 05/07/11 06:35 PM

so because he is from Texas, he is automatically a racist?
I dunno. I've never lived in Texas. All I can go on is the impression we get from what I've seen and heard.


typical... those who know the least, talks the most...

Peccy's photo
Sat 05/07/11 06:57 PM

so because he is from Texas, he is automatically a racist?
I dunno. I've never lived in Texas. All I can go on is the impression we get from what I've seen and heard.
You've been to San Antonio (by self admittance) and that's it. One city out of 268,580 square miles. Not exactly the best random sample of the whole state. But I'm not going over this again. You're smart, you know what you're doing here.

EquusDancer's photo
Sat 05/07/11 07:01 PM

un - be- lievable

MLK was hardly a philanderer he was a courageous minister with a prominent and adoring spouse Coretta



Actually he was. It was even discussed in one of his autobiographies by one of his best friends. See info below. You can google plenty of other sites, and ignore the hateful ones, but it has been verified.

~~~~

FBI surveillance showed that King had dozens of extramarital affairs. Although many of the pertinent records are sealed, several agents who watched observed him engage in many questionable acts including buying prostitutes with SCLC money. Ralph Abernathy, who King called "the best friend I have in the world," substantiated many of these charges in his autobiography, And the Walls Came Tumbling Down.

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Was_Martin_Luther_King_a_philanderer#ixzz1Liq567C2

no photo
Sat 05/07/11 07:04 PM
Seems many of the truly great men in history just couldn't keep it in their pants. Thats my understanding about MLK, too.

mightymoe's photo
Sat 05/07/11 07:04 PM


so because he is from Texas, he is automatically a racist?
I dunno. I've never lived in Texas. All I can go on is the impression we get from what I've seen and heard.
You've been to San Antonio (by self admittance) and that's it. One city out of 268,580 square miles. Not exactly the best random sample of the whole state. But I'm not going over this again. You're smart, you know what you're doing here.


lol he keeps trying, i'll give him an E for effort...
laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

mightymoe's photo
Sat 05/07/11 07:06 PM

Seems many of the truly great men in history just couldn't keep it in their pants. Thats my understanding about MLK, too.

what other great men?

no photo
Sat 05/07/11 07:10 PM
Edison, Einstein, Ben Franklin, Jefferson.

mightymoe's photo
Sat 05/07/11 07:19 PM

Edison, Einstein, Ben Franklin, Jefferson.


clinton too, i think... was it ever proven? lol lots of congressmen seem to always get busted for it too... like the anti gay proponent that got busted in the bathroom, looking for a gay.... the wonder of it all.... the new york governor with the madame scandal... i think he works for cnn now

no photo
Sat 05/07/11 07:19 PM


so because he is from Texas, he is automatically a racist?
I dunno. I've never lived in Texas. All I can go on is the impression we get from what I've seen and heard.


typical... those who know the least, talks the most...


that defensive platitude proves what?

mightymoe's photo
Sat 05/07/11 07:20 PM

Edison, Einstein, Ben Franklin, Jefferson.


i never heard that about Edison or Einstein... is that true or more lib BS?

mightymoe's photo
Sat 05/07/11 07:21 PM
Edited by mightymoe on Sat 05/07/11 07:21 PM



so because he is from Texas, he is automatically a racist?
I dunno. I've never lived in Texas. All I can go on is the impression we get from what I've seen and heard.


typical... those who know the least, talks the most...


that defensive platitude proves what?


english, please.. i have no idea what that means...

no photo
Sat 05/07/11 07:22 PM

Seems many of the truly great men in history just couldn't keep it in their pants. Thats my understanding about MLK, too.


of this I am truly sorry yo hear, but nonetheless I also know the power if a vendetta in the media and the ease with which they can destroy someone

so my doubt remains - tho I now consider myself aware of the true power of the white media

Previous 1 3